7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on all aspects of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Sign up for email alerts here.

      63,741 Monthly downloads/views I 2.989 Impact Factor I 4.5 CiteScore I 1.09 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.744 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Brexpiprazole for Acute Schizophrenia: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of low-dose brexpiprazole (<2 mg/d) compared to placebo and standard-dose brexpiprazole (2–4 mg/d).

          Patients and Methods

          We identified relevant studies pertaining to the specific purpose of our meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, and PsycINFO using the search terms “schizophrenia” or “schizophrenic” AND “brexpiprazole” or “REXULTI”. We systematically reviewed all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing low-dose brexpiprazole with placebo. Primary efficacy outcomes were the PANSS total score change and response rate. Primary safety outcomes were total treatment discontinuation rate, and total serious adverse events (SAEs). Risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled implementing a random effect model.

          Results

          Four RCTs (2178 patients) were included for effect assessment of low-dose brexpiprazole treatment on the patients with acute schizophrenia. Low-dose brexpiprazole was not superior to placebo (SMD = −0.11, 95% CI = −0.23, 0.02, P = 0.10, I 2 = 0%), and significantly inferior to standard-dose brexpiprazole (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.26, P = 0.01, I 2 = 0%) for PANSS total score change. Low-dose brexpiprazole did not result in significant difference for response rate when compared to placebo and standard-dose brexpiprazole (RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.95, 1.41, P = 0.14, I 2 = 25%; RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.76, 1.12, P = 0.40, I 2 = 38%, respectively). For ratio of total discontinuation, low-dose brexpiprazole did not exhibit significant difference when compared to placebo (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.81, 1.11, P = 0.53, I 2 = 0%) and standard-dose brexpiprazole group (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.95, 1.29, P = 0.19, I 2 = 0%). Total SAEs in low-dose brexpiprazole group did not differ significantly from placebo and standard-dose brexpiprazole group (RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.52, 1.80, P = 0.90, I 2 = 0%; RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.65, 2.57, P = 0.47, I 2 = 26%, respectively).

          Conclusion

          The results indicated that low-dose brexpiprazole may be not superior for improving the efficacy and safety for acute schizophrenia compared to placebo and standard-dose brexpiprazole, and may cause additional risk of increasing body weight. Therefore, using low-dose brexpiprazole in acute schizophrenia patients may be not recommended.

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

          The extent of heterogeneity in a meta-analysis partly determines the difficulty in drawing overall conclusions. This extent may be measured by estimating a between-study variance, but interpretation is then specific to a particular treatment effect metric. A test for the existence of heterogeneity exists, but depends on the number of studies in the meta-analysis. We develop measures of the impact of heterogeneity on a meta-analysis, from mathematical criteria, that are independent of the number of studies and the treatment effect metric. We derive and propose three suitable statistics: H is the square root of the chi2 heterogeneity statistic divided by its degrees of freedom; R is the ratio of the standard error of the underlying mean from a random effects meta-analysis to the standard error of a fixed effect meta-analytic estimate, and I2 is a transformation of (H) that describes the proportion of total variation in study estimates that is due to heterogeneity. We discuss interpretation, interval estimates and other properties of these measures and examine them in five example data sets showing different amounts of heterogeneity. We conclude that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity. One or both should be presented in published meta-analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

            David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis in clinical trials

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
                Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
                ndt
                Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
                Dove
                1176-6328
                1178-2021
                11 August 2022
                2022
                : 18
                : 1705-1713
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University (Henan Mental Hospital) , Xinxiang, Henan, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Department of Neurology, Liuzhou General Hospital , Liuzhou, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China
                [3 ]Department of Pharmacy, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Xinxiang City , Xinxiang, Henan, People’s Republic of China
                [4 ]Department of Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University (Henan Mental Hospital) , Xinxiang, Henan, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Chuansheng Wang, Department of Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University (Henan Mental Hospital) , 207# QianJin Road, Xinxiang, Henan, 453000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-373-3388772, Fax +86-373-3374082, Email chuansonwang@126.com
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                374577
                10.2147/NDT.S374577
                9377399
                4ccadc66-25bd-4953-b5fa-ceb6a19d7ad4
                © 2022 Zhao et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 13 May 2022
                : 07 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, References: 41, Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: is no funding;
                There is no funding to report.
                Categories
                Original Research

                Neurology
                brexpiprazole,placebo,acute schizophrenia,rcts,meta-analysis
                Neurology
                brexpiprazole, placebo, acute schizophrenia, rcts, meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article