1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How to judge whether QSAR/read-across predictions can be trusted: a novel approach for establishing a model's applicability domain

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5
      Environmental Science: Nano
      Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Probability-oriented distance-based approach (AD ProbDist) for determining the nano-QSAR/read-across model's applicability domain where true and reliable predictions can be expected.

          Abstract

          The EU REACH legislation, the OECD and US EPA official guidance documents, as well as the 3Rs principle (replacement, reduction, refinement of animal testing), all advocate the necessity of developing comprehensive computational methods ( e.g.quantitative structure–activity relationship, read-across) that would enable the predictive modeling of both chemical ( e.g.nanoparticle) specific functionalities and their hazards. However, since computational (nano)toxicology continues to ‘ learn on the fly’ and relies on the use of a vast array of innovative machine-learning algorithms, serious concerns about the reliability of in silicopredictions are raised. This study aimed to give an answer to the following question: how to judge whether QSAR/read-across predictions are reliable. Here, an effective approach for graphical assessment of the limits of a model's reliable predictions (so-called applicability domain, AD) was introduced. The probability-oriented distance-based approach (AD ProbDist) was proposed as a robust and automatic method for defining the interpolation space where true and reliable predictions can be expected. Its usefulness was confirmed by using four nano-QSAR/read-across models recently reported in the literature. The results of the study showed that the AD ProbDistapproach is more restrictive in terms of the chemical space that falls in the AD of a model than the range, geometrical, distance and leverage approaches. The advantages of the proposed AD ProbDistapproach include (but are not limited to) the fact that it works with relatively small datasets and enables the identification of (un)reliable predictions for newly screened chemicals without experimental data. Further, to facilitate the use of the AD ProbDistapproach, this study provides the developed in-house R-codes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation.

            We demonstrate for 24 metal oxide (MOx) nanoparticles that it is possible to use conduction band energy levels to delineate their toxicological potential at cellular and whole animal levels. Among the materials, the overlap of conduction band energy (E(c)) levels with the cellular redox potential (-4.12 to -4.84 eV) was strongly correlated to the ability of Co(3)O(4), Cr(2)O(3), Ni(2)O(3), Mn(2)O(3), and CoO nanoparticles to induce oxygen radicals, oxidative stress, and inflammation. This outcome is premised on permissible electron transfers from the biological redox couples that maintain the cellular redox equilibrium to the conduction band of the semiconductor particles. Both single-parameter cytotoxic as well as multi-parameter oxidative stress assays in cells showed excellent correlation to the generation of acute neutrophilic inflammation and cytokine responses in the lungs of C57 BL/6 mice. Co(3)O(4), Ni(2)O(3), Mn(2)O(3), and CoO nanoparticles could also oxidize cytochrome c as a representative redox couple involved in redox homeostasis. While CuO and ZnO generated oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation that is not predicted by E(c) levels, the adverse biological effects of these materials could be explained by their solubility, as demonstrated by ICP-MS analysis. These results demonstrate that it is possible to predict the toxicity of a large series of MOx nanoparticles in the lung premised on semiconductor properties and an integrated in vitro/in vivo hazard ranking model premised on oxidative stress. This establishes a robust platform for modeling of MOx structure-activity relationships based on band gap energy levels and particle dissolution. This predictive toxicological paradigm is also of considerable importance for regulatory decision-making about this important class of engineered nanomaterials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                ESNNA4
                Environmental Science: Nano
                Environ. Sci.: Nano
                Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
                2051-8153
                2051-8161
                2018
                2018
                : 5
                : 2
                : 408-421
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Gdansk
                [2 ]Faculty of Chemistry
                [3 ]Laboratory of Environmental Chemometrics
                [4 ]Gdansk
                [5 ]Poland
                Article
                10.1039/C7EN00774D
                4d31303d-7427-4e11-99b4-a8fb32415fba
                © 2018

                http://rsc.li/journals-terms-of-use

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article