0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The aim of this study was to analyze the course of visual acuity (VA) in visual outcomes of patients treated with iodine-125 ( 125I) brachytherapy in our center, based on original VA before treatment.

          Material and methods

          Visual acuity was prospectively assessed using a case series of 305 patients treated with 125I between 1996 and 2022. To examine how VA behaves over time, we divided patient sample into 4 groups: (1) Patients with visual acuity of less than V ≤ 0.1 at baseline; (2) Patients with low to moderate VA, ranging 0.1 < V < 0.4; (3) Patients with moderate-high VA, ranging 0.4 < V < 0.8; (4) Patients with very high VA of V > 0.8. Each of the four groups was studied separately over a 60-month period to determine the percentage of patients with VA improvement, worsening, or with the same VA status. Finally, visual outcomes over time were estimated with 95% confidence interval (CI) using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and VA maintenance rates were reported at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up.

          Results

          The median follow-up time was 78.2 months (range, 6-254 months). The cumulative probabilities of survival analysis at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 16%, 3%, 2%, and none for the first sub-group; 46%, 20%, 17%, and 14% for the second; 65%, 53%, 29%, and 15% for the third; and 86%, 56%, 48%, and 41% for the fourth sub-group. The median survival in years was 0.30, 0.80, 3.10, and 4.40 for each sub-cohort, respectively.

          Conclusions

          The decrease and maintenance of VA depends on the initial VA of patients. Most patients experience a marked worsening of their VA, regardless of their VA status before treatment with episcleral brachytherapy. Patients with a higher baseline VA retain VA best over time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Uveal melanoma: trends in incidence, treatment, and survival.

          To determine trends in incidence, treatment, and survival with primary uveal melanoma in the United States over a 36-year period from 1973 to 2008. Systematic review of existing databases. A total of 4070 patients with primary uveal melanoma (International Classification of Disease for Oncology [ICD-O-2] codes C69.3 [choroid], C69.4 [ciliary body and iris], and C69.2 [retina]) derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database in the United States from 1973 to 2008. The significance of trends in age-adjusted incidence, treatment, and 5-year relative survival rates were determined using chi-square testing and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Age-adjusted incidence, form of treatment (surgery, radiation, or both), and 5-year relative survival rates. There were 4070 cases of uveal melanoma representing 3.1% of all recorded cases of melanoma. The majority of cases (98.3%) were reported by hospital inpatient/outpatient clinics. Histopathologic confirmation was available in 2804 cases (72.1% for all years). The mean age-adjusted incidence of uveal melanoma in the United States was 5.1 per million (95% CI, 4.8-5.3). The majority of cases (97.8%) occurred in the white population. There was a statistically significant variation of age-adjusted incidence between sexes (male = 5.8, 95% CI, 5.5-6.2; and female = 4.4, 95% CI, 4.2-4.7). A decreasing trend was observed in patients treated with surgery alone (93.8% for 1973-1975 vs. 28.3% for 2006-2008), whereas a corresponding increase was seen in those treated with radiation (1.8% for 1973-1975 vs. 62.5% for 2006-2008). No change in the 5-year relative survival rate (81.6%) was observed from 1973 to 2008. The age-adjusted incidence of uveal melanoma (5.1 per million) has remained unchanged from 1973 to 2008. Despite a shift toward more conservative treatments, survival has not improved during this time period. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for plaque brachytherapy of uveal melanoma and retinoblastoma.

            (2014)
            To present the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines for plaque brachytherapy of choroidal melanoma and retinoblastoma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Collaborative ocular melanoma study (COMS) randomized trial of I-125 brachytherapy for medium choroidal melanoma. I. Visual acuity after 3 years COMS report no. 16.

              (2001)
              To report visual acuity during the first three years after iodine 125 (I(125)) brachytherapy for medium-sized choroidal melanoma and to identify important baseline and treatment factors associated with posttreatment visual acuity in a group of patients who were treated and observed prospectively as part of a large, randomized clinical trial. Observational case series within a randomized, multicenter study. Patients enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study randomized trial of I(125) brachytherapy versus enucleation had choroidal melanoma of at least 2.5 mm but no more than 10.0 mm in apical height, and no more than 16.0 mm in largest basal dimension. One thousand three hundred seventeen patients enrolled from February 1987 through July 1998; 657 patients were assigned to I(125) brachytherapy. Visual acuity data for 623 patients who received I(125) brachytherapy as randomly assigned and who have been observed for at least 1 year were analyzed for this report. Under study protocol, an ophthalmic evaluation, including best-corrected visual acuity measurement of each eye, was performed at baseline, every 6 months thereafter for 5 years, and once yearly thereafter. Two poor vision outcomes, visual acuity of 20/200 or worse that was confirmed at the next follow-up examination and loss of six lines or more of visual acuity from baseline that was confirmed at the next follow-up examination, were analyzed to identify baseline and treatment characteristics that were associated with posttreatment visual acuity. At baseline, median visual acuity in the eye with choroidal melanoma was 20/32, with 70% of eyes having 20/40 or better and 10% of eyes having 20/200 or worse visual acuity. Three years after I(125) brachytherapy, median visual acuity was 20/125, with 34% having 20/40 or better and 45% having 20/200 or worse visual acuity, including eyes that were enucleated within 3 years of treatment. Life-table estimates of percentages of patients who lost six or more lines of visual acuity from baseline, a quadrupling of the minimum angle of resolution, with this finding confirmed at the next 6-month follow-up examination, were 18% by 1 year, 34% by 2 years, and 49% by 3 years after treatment. Life-table estimates of percentages of patients with baseline visual acuity better than 20/200 whose visual acuity decreased to 20/200 or worse, confirmed at the next follow-up examination, were 17% by 1 year, 33% by 2 years, and 43% by 3 years after treatment. As soon as a poor vision outcome was observed, improvement of visual acuity to a level that no longer met the definition for a poor vision outcome was rare. Greater baseline tumor apical height and shorter distance between the tumor and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were the factors most strongly associated with loss of six or more lines of visual acuity after treatment. These two factors and baseline visual acuity also were strongly associated with visual acuity 20/200 or worse after treatment. Patient history of diabetes, presence of tumor-associated retinal detachment, and tumors that were not dome shaped also were associated with greater risk for both of the poor vision outcomes. Forty-three percent to 49% of treated eyes had substantial impairment in visual acuity by 3 years after I(125) brachytherapy, defined as a loss of six or more lines of visual acuity from the pretreatment level (49% of eyes) or visual acuity of 20/200 or worse (43% of eyes) that was confirmed at the next 6-month examination. Patients with a history of diabetes and patients whose eyes had thicker tumors, tumors close to or beneath the FAZ, tumor-associated retinal detachment, or tumors that were not dome shaped were those most likely to have a poor visual acuity outcome within 3 years after I(125) brachytherapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Contemp Brachytherapy
                J Contemp Brachytherapy
                JCB
                Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
                Termedia Publishing House
                1689-832X
                2081-2841
                31 October 2023
                October 2023
                : 15
                : 5
                : 350-356
                Affiliations
                [1]Intraocular Tumors Unit, Valladolid University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain
                [2]Institution address: Av. Ramón y Cajal, 3, 47003 Valladolid, Spain
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: David Miguel Pérez, Intraocular Tumors Unit, Valladolid University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain, C/Manuel Azaña n 45 7J 47014, phone: +34-609965860, ⌧ e-mail: david.miguel@ 123456outlook.com
                Article
                51747
                10.5114/jcb.2023.132658
                10669921
                4dac862c-4484-4bfc-8799-f3c66f841a0b
                Copyright © 2023 Termedia

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

                History
                : 21 July 2023
                : 24 October 2023
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                uveal melanoma,outcomes,visual acuity
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                uveal melanoma, outcomes, visual acuity

                Comments

                Comment on this article