0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Lesions of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis do not impair prepulse inhibition and latent inhibition of fear-potentiated startle in the rat

      ,
      Brain Research
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The present study tested if lesions of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM) affect prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response and latent inhibition (LI) of fear-potentiated startle. The NBM is known to play an important role in learning and memory. Recently, the interest of research focused on its role in attentional and response selection processes. We here tested the effect of excitotoxic NBM-lesions on PPI, a phenomenon of sensorimotor gating that occurs at early stages of information processing. We also assessed the lesion effects on LI, a phenomenon of reduced conditioning after stimulus preexposure that can be used to measure selective attention. Bilateral infusions into the NBM of 80 nmol of quinolinic acid markedly reduced the number of choline acetyltransferase immunopositive neurons in the NBM and lead to a pronounced reduction of acetylcholine esterase in the cortex and the amygdala. However, no effects on PPI, fear-conditioning, or LI of fear-potentiated startle were found. Therefore, we conclude that there is no NBM-driven attentional or response selection process involved in PPI. Furthermore, the simple association learning in the classical conditioning paradigm used for fear-potentiated startle or LI is unaffected by NBM-lesions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Brain Research
          Brain Research
          Elsevier BV
          00068993
          January 1999
          January 1999
          : 815
          : 1
          : 98-105
          Article
          10.1016/S0006-8993(98)01134-2
          9974127
          4df32d00-222c-4c8b-9736-fe984a12a004
          © 1999

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article