15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of Two Approaches for Aligning Data Obtained from a Motion Capture System and an In-Shoe Pressure Measurement System

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An in-shoe pressure measurement (IPM) system can be used to measure center of pressure (COP) locations, and has fewer restrictions compared to the more conventional approach using a force platform. The insole of an IPM system, however, has its own coordinate system. To use an IPM system along with a motion capture system, there is thus a need to align the coordinate systems of the two measurement systems. To address this need, the current study examined two different approaches—rigid body transformation and nonlinear mapping ( i.e., multilayer feed-forward neural network (MFNN))—to express COP measurements from an IPM system in the coordinate system of a motion capture system. Ten participants (five male and five female) completed several simulated manual material handling (MMH) activities, and during these activities the performance of the two approaches was assessed. Results indicated that: (1) performance varied between MMH activity types; and (2) a MFNN performed better than or comparable to the rigid body transformation, depending on the specific input variable sets used. Further, based on the results obtained, it was argued that a nonlinear mapping vs. rigid body transformation approach may be more effective to account for shoe deformation during MMH or potentially other types of physical activity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Principal Component Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The test-retest reliability of centre of pressure measures in bipedal static task conditions--a systematic review of the literature.

            The analysis of centre of pressure (COP) excursions is used as an index of postural stability in standing. Conflicting data have been reported over the past 20 years regarding the reliability of COP measures and no standard procedure for COP measure use in study design has been established. Six online databases (January 1980 to February 2009) were systematically searched followed by a manual search of retrieved papers. Thirty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the papers (26/32, 81.3%) demonstrated acceptable reliability. While COP mean velocity (mVel) demonstrated variable but generally good reliability throughout the different studies (r=0.32-0.94), no single measurement of COP appeared significantly more reliable than the others. Regarding data acquisition duration, a minimum of 90 s is required to reach acceptable reliability for most COP parameters. This review further suggests that while eyes closed readings may show slightly higher reliability coefficients, both eyes open and closed setups allow acceptable readings under the described conditions (r ≥ 0.75). Also averaging the results of three to five repetitions on firm surface is necessary to obtain acceptable reliability. A sampling frequency of 100 Hz with a cut-off frequency of 10 Hz is also recommended. No final conclusion regarding the feet position could be reached. The studies reviewed show that bipedal static COP measures may be used as a reliable tool for investigating general postural stability and balance performance under specific conditions. Recommendations for maximizing the reliability of COP data are provided. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Neural Neworks: A Comprehensive Foundation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                September 2014
                12 September 2014
                : 14
                : 9
                : 16994-17007
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA; E-Mail: sunwook@ 123456vt.edu
                [2 ] Virginia Tech–Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
                Author notes
                [* ] Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: nussbaum@ 123456vt.edu ; Tel.: +1-540-231-6053; Fax: +1-540-231-3322.
                Article
                sensors-14-16994
                10.3390/s140916994
                4208210
                25222032
                4e0fcacd-871c-470a-8877-a1fe7e6f34fc
                © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 10 July 2014
                : 13 August 2014
                : 11 September 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                in-shoe pressure measurement,center of pressure,manual material handling

                Comments

                Comment on this article