10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Output variability across animals and levels in a motor system

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rhythmic behaviors vary across individuals. We investigated the sources of this output variability across a motor system, from the central pattern generator (CPG) to the motor plant. In the bilaterally symmetric leech heartbeat system, the CPG orchestrates two coordinations in the bilateral hearts with different intersegmental phase relations (Δ ϕ) and periodic side-to-side switches. Population variability is large. We show that the system is precise within a coordination, that differences in repetitions of a coordination contribute little to population output variability, but that differences between bilaterally homologous cells may contribute to some of this variability. Nevertheless, much output variability is likely associated with genetic and life history differences among individuals. Variability of Δ ϕ were coordination-specific: similar at all levels in one, but significantly lower for the motor pattern than the CPG pattern in the other. Mechanisms that transform CPG output to motor neurons may limit output variability in the motor pattern.

          eLife digest

          Many of our everyday behaviors are rhythmic actions, such as walking, breathing and chewing. Networks of neurons called Central Pattern Generators, or CPGs, are in charge of rhythmic behaviors. CPGs send instructions to cells called motor neurons, which in turn tell muscles to contract in a particular sequence to produce rhythmic behaviors.

          Rhythmic behaviors follow stereotyped patterns: we recognize walking when we see it. But they also vary between individuals: we can recognize the specific gait or ‘walk’ of a friend. Wenning et al. set out to discover where this variability in rhythmic behaviors comes from, using the leech heartbeat system as a model. Leeches have two hearts, or more precisely two heart tubes that run along the entire length of the body, one on either side. The two heart tubes beat with different patterns, but under the direction of the CPGs and motor neurons, they swap patterns with each other every few minutes. The CPG neurons that generate these rhythms, the motor neurons that respond, and the heart muscles themselves, i.e. each level of the system, can all be tracked in leeches.

          Wenning et al. showed that within each leech, the activity of the CPG neurons, motor neurons and muscles associated with a heart tube varies little. Even when the activity of one of these levels varies less than another, for example between CPG and motor neurons, it is not necessarily reflected in the next level of the system. In some cases, however, variability is seen between opposite sides. Moreover, the rhythmic activity of CPG neurons, motor neurons, and muscle cells in one leech differs greatly from that of another. This likely reflects differences in the genes and life history of the animals.

          Wenning et al. provide a roadmap for others to use in identifying sources of variability in rhythmic movements. Applying this approach to existing data sets could help tease apart variability in diverse rhythmic behaviors in a variety of animals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function.

          Neurons in most animals live a very long time relative to the half-lives of all of the proteins that govern excitability and synaptic transmission. Consequently, homeostatic mechanisms are necessary to ensure stable neuronal and network function over an animal's lifetime. To understand how these homeostatic mechanisms might function, it is crucial to understand how tightly regulated synaptic and intrinsic properties must be for adequate network performance, and the extent to which compensatory mechanisms allow for multiple solutions to the production of similar behaviour. Here, we use examples from theoretical and experimental studies of invertebrates and vertebrates to explore several issues relevant to understanding the precision of tuning of synaptic and intrinsic currents for the operation of functional neuronal circuits.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters.

            It is often assumed that cellular and synaptic properties need to be regulated to specific values to allow a neuronal network to function properly. To determine how tightly neuronal properties and synaptic strengths need to be tuned to produce a given network output, we simulated more than 20 million versions of a three-cell model of the pyloric network of the crustacean stomatogastric ganglion using different combinations of synapse strengths and neuron properties. We found that virtually indistinguishable network activity can arise from widely disparate sets of underlying mechanisms, suggesting that there could be considerable animal-to-animal variability in many of the parameters that control network activity, and that many different combinations of synaptic strengths and intrinsic membrane properties can be consistent with appropriate network performance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Variable channel expression in identified single and electrically coupled neurons in different animals.

              It is often assumed that all neurons of the same cell type have identical intrinsic properties, both within an animal and between animals. We exploited the large size and small number of unambiguously identifiable neurons in the crab stomatogastric ganglion to test this assumption at the level of channel mRNA expression and membrane currents (measured in voltage-clamp experiments). In lateral pyloric (LP) neurons, we saw strong correlations between measured current and the abundance of Shal and BK-KCa mRNAs (encoding the Shal-family voltage-gated potassium channel and large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel, respectively). We also saw two- to fourfold interanimal variability for three potassium currents and their mRNA expression. Measurements of channel expression in the two electrically coupled pyloric dilator (PD) neurons showed significant interanimal variability, but copy numbers for IH (encoding the hyperpolarization-activated, inward-current channel) and Shal mRNA in the two PD neurons from the same crab were similar, suggesting that the regulation of some currents may be shared in electrically coupled neurons.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Reviewing Editor
                Journal
                eLife
                Elife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
                2050-084X
                18 January 2018
                2018
                : 7
                : e31123
                Affiliations
                [1 ]deptBiology Department Emory University AtlantaUnited States
                [2 ]deptBiological Sciences California State University San MarcosUnited States
                [3 ]deptSchool of Science and Technology Georgia Gwinnett College LawrencevilleUnited States
                Seattle Children's Research Institute and University of Washington United States
                Seattle Children's Research Institute and University of Washington United States
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9400-6280
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-571X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2462-5203
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7135-3469
                Article
                31123
                10.7554/eLife.31123
                5773184
                29345614
                4f66a1c4-4ef6-4335-bb20-5657cf3aba9b
                © 2017, Wenning et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 10 August 2017
                : 22 November 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000065, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke;
                Award ID: 1 R01 NS085006
                Award Recipient :
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Neuroscience
                Custom metadata
                Population output variability in a motor control system varies across levels (CPG, motor neurons, muscles) and can be ascribed to life history differences among animals and in some cases to differences between bilaterally homologous elements.

                Life sciences
                rhythmic motor pattern,cpg,phase variability,motor variability,population variability,leech,other

                Comments

                Comment on this article