8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of Community-based Exercise Prehabilitation for Patients Scheduled for Colorectal Surgery With High Risk for Postoperative Complications: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Objective:

          To assess the effects of a 3-week community-based exercise program on 30-day postoperative complications in high-risk patients scheduled for elective colorectal resection for (pre)malignancy.

          Summary Background Data:

          Patients with a low preoperative aerobic fitness undergoing colorectal surgery have an increased risk of postoperative complications. It remains, however, to be demonstrated whether prehabilitation in these patients reduces postoperative complications.

          Methods:

          This 2-center, prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial was carried out in 2 large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients (≥60 years) with colorectal (pre)malignancy scheduled for elective colorectal resection and with a score ≤7 metabolic equivalents on the veterans-specific activity questionnaire were randomly assigned to the prehabilitation group or the usual care group by using block-stratified randomization. An oxygen uptake at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold <11 mL/kg/min at the baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test was the final inclusion criterion. Inclusion was based on a power analysis. Patients in the prehabilitation group participated in a personalized 3-week (3 sessions per week, nine sessions in total) supervised exercise program given in community physical therapy practices before colorectal resection. Patients in the reference group received usual care. The primary outcome was the number of patients with one or more complications within 30 days of surgery, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

          Results:

          Between February 2014 and December 2018, 57 patients [30 males and 27 females; mean age 73.6 years (standard deviation 6.1), range 61–88 years] were randomized to either prehabilitation ( n = 28) or usual care ( n = 29). The rate of postoperative complications was lower in the prehabilitation group ( n = 12, 42.9%) than in the usual care group ( n = 21, 72.4%, relative risk 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.37–0.96, P = 0.024).

          Conclusions:

          Exercise prehabilitation reduced postoperative complications in high-risk patients scheduled to undergo elective colon resection for (pre)malignancy. Prehabilitation should be considered as usual care in high-risk patients scheduled for elective colon, and probably also rectal, surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries

          This article provides a status report on the global burden of cancer worldwide using the GLOBOCAN 2018 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with a focus on geographic variability across 20 world regions. There will be an estimated 18.1 million new cancer cases (17.0 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and 9.6 million cancer deaths (9.5 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) in 2018. In both sexes combined, lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer (11.6% of the total cases) and the leading cause of cancer death (18.4% of the total cancer deaths), closely followed by female breast cancer (11.6%), prostate cancer (7.1%), and colorectal cancer (6.1%) for incidence and colorectal cancer (9.2%), stomach cancer (8.2%), and liver cancer (8.2%) for mortality. Lung cancer is the most frequent cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among males, followed by prostate and colorectal cancer (for incidence) and liver and stomach cancer (for mortality). Among females, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, followed by colorectal and lung cancer (for incidence), and vice versa (for mortality); cervical cancer ranks fourth for both incidence and mortality. The most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, however, substantially vary across countries and within each country depending on the degree of economic development and associated social and life style factors. It is noteworthy that high-quality cancer registry data, the basis for planning and implementing evidence-based cancer control programs, are not available in most low- and middle-income countries. The Global Initiative for Cancer Registry Development is an international partnership that supports better estimation, as well as the collection and use of local data, to prioritize and evaluate national cancer control efforts. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2018;0:1-31. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

              Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. This shortcoming hampers comparison of outcome data among different centers and therapies and over time. A classification of complications published by one of the authors in 1992 was critically re-evaluated and modified to increase its accuracy and its acceptability in the surgical community. Modifications mainly focused on the manner of reporting life-threatening and permanently disabling complications. The new grading system still mostly relies on the therapy used to treat the complication. The classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients who underwent elective general surgery at our institution. The reproducibility and personal judgment of the classification were evaluated through an international survey with 2 questionnaires sent to 10 surgical centers worldwide. The new ranking system significantly correlated with complexity of surgery (P < 0.0001) as well as with the length of the hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A total of 144 surgeons from 10 different centers around the world and at different levels of training returned the survey. Ninety percent of the case presentations were correctly graded. The classification was considered to be simple (92% of the respondents), reproducible (91%), logical (92%), useful (90%), and comprehensive (89%). The answers of both questionnaires were not dependent on the origin of the reply and the level of training of the surgeons. The new complication classification appears reliable and may represent a compelling tool for quality assessment in surgery in all parts of the world.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Surg
                Ann Surg
                ANSU
                Annals of Surgery
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0003-4932
                1528-1140
                February 2022
                11 January 2021
                : 275
                : 2
                : e299-e306
                Affiliations
                []Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50000, Enschede, The Netherlands
                []Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                []Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [§ ]Fysio Twente, J.J. van Deinselaan 34a, Enschede, The Netherlands
                [|| ]FITclinic, Roomweg 180, Enschede, The Netherlands
                []Department of Pulmonology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50000, Enschede, The Netherlands
                [# ]Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50000, Enschede, The Netherlands
                [∗∗ ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50000, Enschede, The Netherlands
                [†† ]Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50000, Enschede, The Netherlands
                [‡‡ ]Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, PO Box 7600, Almelo, The Netherlands
                [§§ ]Top Sector Life Sciences & Health (Health∼Holland), PO Box 93035, The Hague, The Netherlands
                [|||| ]Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [¶¶ ]Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, Groningen, The Netherlands.
                Author notes
                Article
                ANNSURG-D-20-03157 00033
                10.1097/SLA.0000000000004702
                8746915
                33443905
                5028ec17-0bef-4d32-96d0-2d25122c4ab1
                Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                Categories
                Randomized Controlled Trials
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                ONLINE-ONLY

                aerobic fitness,colorectal surgery,exercise training,morbidity,physical fitness,physical therapy,postoperative complications,prehabilitation,ventilatory anaerobic threshold

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content289

                Cited by56

                Most referenced authors1,110