Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors that may improve outcomes of early traumatic brain injury care: prospective multicenter study in Austria

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Existing evidence concerning the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients underlines the importance of appropriate treatment strategies in both prehospital and early in-hospital care. The objectives of this study were to analyze the current state of early TBI care in Austria with its physician-based emergency medical service. Subsequently, identified areas for improvement were transformed into treatment recommendations. The proposed changes were implemented in participating emergency medical services and hospitals and evaluated for their effect.

          Methods

          14 Austrian centers treating TBI patients participated in the study. Between 2009 and 2012 all patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13 and/or AIS head > 2 within 48 h after the accident, were enrolled. Data were collected in 2 phases: in the first phase data of 408 patients were analyzed. Based on this, a set of recommendations expected to improve outcomes was developed by the study group and implemented in participating centers. Recommendations included time factors (transport to appropriate trauma center, avoiding secondary transfer), adequate treatment strategies (prehospital fluid and airway management, anesthesia, ventilation), monitoring (pulse oximetry and blood pressure monitoring in all patients, capnography in ventilated patients) for prehospital treatment. In the emergency department focus was on first CT scan as soon as possible, short interval between CT scan and surgery and early use of thrombelastometry to optimize coagulation. Following implementation of these recommendations, data on 325 patients were collected and analyzed in phase 2. Final analysis investigated the impact of the recommendations on patient outcomes.

          Results

          Patients in both data collection phases showed comparable demographic and injury severity characteristics. Treatment changes, especially in terms of fluid management, monitoring and normoventilation as well as thrombelastometry measurements were implemented successfully in phase 2, and led to significant improvement of patient outcomes. Hospital mortality was reduced from 31 % to 23 %. We found a lower rate of unfavorable outcomes, a significant increase in unexpected survivors and more patients with unexpected favorable outcomes as well.

          Conclusions

          The results of this study clearly demonstrate that the outcomes of TBI patients can be improved with appropriate early care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.

          To develop and validate practical prognostic models for death at 14 days and for death or severe disability six months after traumatic brain injury. Multivariable logistic regression to select variables that were independently associated with two patient outcomes. Two models designed: "basic" model (demographic and clinical variables only) and "CT" model (basic model plus results of computed tomography). The models were subsequently developed for high and low-middle income countries separately. Medical Research Council (MRC) CRASH Trial. 10,008 patients with traumatic brain injury. Models externally validated in a cohort of 8509. The basic model included four predictors: age, Glasgow coma scale, pupil reactivity, and the presence of major extracranial injury. The CT model also included the presence of petechial haemorrhages, obliteration of the third ventricle or basal cisterns, subarachnoid bleeding, midline shift, and non-evacuated haematoma. In the derivation sample the models showed excellent discrimination (C statistic above 0.80). The models showed good calibration graphically. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test also indicated good calibration, except for the CT model in low-middle income countries. External validation for unfavourable outcome at six months in high income countries showed that basic and CT models had good discrimination (C statistic 0.77 for both models) but poorer calibration. Simple prognostic models can be used to obtain valid predictions of relevant outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury-outcomes at 6 months.

            MRC CRASH is a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN74459797) of the effect of corticosteroids on death and disability after head injury. We randomly allocated 10,008 adults with head injury and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 or less, within 8 h of injury, to a 48-h infusion of corticosteroid (methylprednisolone) or placebo. Data at 6 months were obtained for 9673 (96.7%) patients. The risk of death was higher in the corticosteroid group than in the placebo group (1248 [25.7%] vs 1075 [22.3%] deaths; relative risk 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.24; p=0.0001), as was the risk of death or severe disability (1828 [38.1%] vs 1728 [36.3%] dead or severely disabled; 1.05, 0.99-1.10; p=0.079). There was no evidence that the effect of corticosteroids differed by injury severity or time since injury. These results lend support to our earlier conclusion that corticosteroids should not be used routinely in the treatment of head injury.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              World report on road traffic injury prevention

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                43699 1072 0609 , abrazinova@igeh.org
                mmajdan@igeh.org
                johannes.leitgeb@meduniwien.ac.at
                Helmut.Trimmel@wienerneustadt.lknoe.at
                walter.mauritz@auva.at
                Journal
                Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
                Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
                Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1757-7241
                16 July 2015
                16 July 2015
                2015
                : 23
                : 53
                Affiliations
                [ ]International Neurotrauma Research Organization (INRO), Mölker Gasse 4/3, 1080 Vienna, Austria
                [ ]Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Trnava University, Univerzitne nam.1, 91843 Trnava, Slovak Republic
                [ ]Department of Traumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
                [ ]Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Wiener Neustadt Regional Hospital, Corvinusring 3-5, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
                [ ]Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Hospital ‘Lorenz Boehler”, Donaueschingenstraße 13, 1200 Vienna, Austria
                Article
                133
                10.1186/s13049-015-0133-z
                4504095
                26179747
                504d26f7-a49f-4f23-8f0d-581b3918c57c
                © Brazinova et al. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 12 February 2015
                : 6 July 2015
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                traumatic brain injury,prehospital care,early care,emergency care,comparative effectiveness research

                Comments

                Comment on this article