9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Airway pressure release ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multicenter observational study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Evidence prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic suggested that, compared with conventional ventilation strategies, airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) can improve oxygenation and reduce mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. We aimed to assess the association between APRV use and clinical outcomes among adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 and hypothesized that APRV use would be associated with improved survival compared with conventional ventilation.

          Methods

          A total of 25 patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis was admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for invasive ventilation in Perth, Western Australia, between February and May 2020. Eleven of these patients received APRV. The primary outcome was survival to day 90. Secondary outcomes were ventilation-free survival days to day 90, mechanical complications from ventilation, and number of days ventilated.

          Results

          Patients who received APRV had a lower probability of survival than did those on other forms of ventilation (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.89; P=0.036). This finding was independent of indices of severity of illness to predict the use of APRV. Patients who received APRV also had fewer ventilator-free survival days up to 90 days after initiation of ventilation compared to patients who did not receive APRV, and survivors who received APRV had fewer ventilator-free days than survivors who received other forms of ventilation. There were no differences in mechanical complications according to mode of ventilation.

          Conclusions

          Based on the findings of this study, we urge caution with the use of APRV in COVID-19.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners

              The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data management platform was developed in 2004 to address an institutional need at Vanderbilt University, then shared with a limited number of adopting sites beginning in 2006. Given bi-directional benefit in early sharing experiments, we created a broader consortium sharing and support model for any academic, non-profit, or government partner wishing to adopt the software. Our sharing framework and consortium-based support model have evolved over time along with the size of the consortium (currently more than 3200 REDCap partners across 128 countries). While the "REDCap Consortium" model represents only one example of how to build and disseminate a software platform, lessons learned from our approach may assist other research institutions seeking to build and disseminate innovative technologies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acute Crit Care
                Acute Crit Care
                ACC
                Acute and Critical Care
                Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine
                2586-6052
                2586-6060
                May 2021
                4 May 2021
                : 36
                : 2
                : 143-150
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Intensive Care Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
                [2 ]Intensive Care Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
                [3 ]University of Western Australia School of Medicine, Perth, Australia
                [4 ]School of Veterinary & Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
                [5 ]Intensive Care Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
                [6 ]Intensive Care Department, St John of God Midland Hospital, Perth, Australia
                Author notes
                Corresponding author Matthew H. Anstey Intensive Care Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Ave, Perth 6009, Australia Tel: +61-864571010 E-mail: Matthew.Anstey@ 123456health.wa.gov.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6705-6004
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5125-6829
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1126-3773
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7927-524X
                Article
                acc-2021-00017
                10.4266/acc.2021.00017
                8182154
                33940775
                5101060c-9fe9-4c32-bd25-386e2fbc3d96
                Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 4 January 2021
                : 1 March 2021
                : 17 March 2021
                Categories
                Original Article
                Pulmonary

                covid-19,intensive care,respiration, artificial,ventilation mode, aprv

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content167

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors1,345