23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on postgraduate medical education in a Singaporean academic medical institution

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has progressed relentlessly since the first case was reported in Wuhan, China on 31st December 2019. In Singapore, the first case was reported on 23rd January 2020. As the number of cases increased, the government has since escalated the national alert system to the 2nd highest level. Residents have been deployed based on service needs, non-urgent appointments and surgeries have been postponed and inter-hospital rotations have been suspended. As such, postgraduate medical education would have to be reorganized on top of these changes. Specialist training in Singapore follows the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-International recommendations. In this opinion paper, we share the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on postgraduate education in the National University Hospital, Singapore (Fig. 1). Increasing service requirements due to the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the balance between clinical service and medical education. Dedicated pandemic teams have been started in the hospital coupled with an augmentation of manpower in emergency department and intensive care units by residents. Residents are being deployed beyond their traditional duties not planned as part of their training rotations. To ease the manpower shortage, some fresh local graduates are being fast-tracked into internship 1 week earlier. Turner et al. [1] previously discussed the logical fallacy of a service-education balance given the increasing administrative demands, duty hour limitations and service demands (including service quality and safety) in healthcare in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period. With an increase in clinical load, there is a challenge for educators to consider alternative methods of providing education on top of service. National infection control policy has mandated that doctors are not allowed to rotate across hospitals to minimize healthcare transmission, barring exceptional circumstances. Our residency program trains residents at three restructured hospitals and several partner sites including community hospitals and polyclinics. There are also exchanges with other programs from other sponsoring institutions. With the shift in alert level, rotations that could only be fulfilled at certain sites could not continue, and residents at external institutions could not be rotated back. This has disrupted training. Furthermore, to avoid any intra-departmental spread of infection, teachings that used to be held in meeting rooms have been transitioned to an online format. As such, there has been a sharp increase in the use of videoconferencing technology. Whilst using such technology is fairly novel for our institution as the de-facto method of teaching, videoconferencing has been previously shown to be effective even if learners are physically isolated [2]. Educators will need to adopt strategies to maximize the educational potential of videoconferencing [3]. On the upside, teachings in our institution that were previously hospital-based could now be extended to our partner departments from the other hospitals within our cluster, and even to our residents who have rotated to other sponsoring institutions. Recorded versions of these sessions can also be provided to residents for their review later. For surgical residents, due to the reduction in surgical caseload, mitigation measures such as the use of simulators will be needed to upkeep manual dexterity skills. There has also been an impact on trainees in terms of examinations. Several mandatory summative postgraduate examinations and exit specialist examinations have been postponed or cancelled. This has provoked anxiety in residents as they wonder whether they would be allowed to complete their training. Some medical schools in the United Kingdom have done away with their final examinations, citing student competency assessments during training as being sufficient reflection of ability [4]. This does bring to the forefront the continued debate of the role of a high-stakes summative assessment versus continual assessments. There is a push to reduce the weightage of high-stakes summative assessments to a programmatic one in line with a shift towards competency-based education [5]. This requires a change in perspective by membership colleges and residency faculty. The use of a portfolio might gain renewed interest as well [6]. The alternative is to take adequate precaution. For example, the emergency medicine specialty in Singapore continued with their written examinations, but with strict segregation of candidates from different institutions in different rooms. Exams could also use simulators or standardized patients instead of real patients. The respective specialty residency advisory committees would need to review and recommend modifications to training requirements taking into consideration core competencies for the new training environment and constraints present. This pandemic is likely to spark intense discussions into what constitutes good assessment, and how it can best be done [7]. Finally, it is important for medical educators to consider the mental and emotional well-being of residents. COVID-19 can cause significant psychological impact on residents [8]. Prior to the pandemic, resident burnout levels have already been reported to be high [9]. There is a need to implement preventive measures to prevent burnout as the pandemic is projected to last at least until the end of the year. Our institution has made available counsellors that residents can reach out to for advice. Faculty have been looking out for junior staff to ensure that the workload is well balanced and that they receive adequate rest. There are opportunities for the residencies to look into how to build teamwork among residents of different specialties posted to the COVID-19 care areas. Teamwork is crucial in high-risk, high-intensity work environments like the frontlines minimize mistakes [10]. Lastly, there needs to be enough personal protective equipment for residents to carry out their duties so that they can focus on clinical care. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought on new challenges to the postgraduate medical education landscape. Nevertheless, we think it is an invaluable opportunity for educators to innovate to ensure that residents continue to be trained to be brave and competent doctors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Teaching teamwork in medical education.

          Teamwork has become a major focus in healthcare. In part, this is the result of the Institute of Medicine report entitled To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System, which details the high rate of preventable medical errors, many of which are the result of dysfunctional or nonexistent teamwork. It has been proposed that a healthcare system that supports effective teamwork can improve the quality of patient care and reduce workload issues that cause burnout among healthcare professionals. Few clear guidelines exist to help guide the implementation of all these recommendations in healthcare settings. In general, training programs designed to improve team skills are a new concept for medicine, particularly for physicians who are trained largely to be self-sufficient and individually responsible for their actions. Outside of healthcare, research has shown that teams working together in high-risk and high-intensity work environments make fewer mistakes than individuals. This evidence originates from commercial aviation, the military, firefighting, and rapid-response police activities. Commercial aviation, an industry in which mistakes can result in unacceptable loss, has been at the forefront of risk reduction through teamwork training. The importance of teamwork has been recognized by some in the healthcare industry who have begun to develop their own specialty-driven programs. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current literature on teaching about teamwork in undergraduate medical education. We describe the science of teams, analyze the work in team training that has been done in other fields, and assess what work has been done in other fields about the importance of team training (ie, aviation, nonmedical education, and business). Additionally, it is vital to assess what work has already been done in medicine to advance the skills required for effective teamwork. Much of this work has been done in fields in which medical professionals deal with crisis situations (ie, anesthesia, trauma, and labor and delivery). We describe the current programs for teaching medical students these essential skills and what recommendations have been made about the best ways to introduce teaching this skill set into the curriculum. Finally, we include a review on assessing teamwork because one cannot teach team training without implementing an assessment to ensure that the skills are being learned.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Competency‐based education calls for programmatic assessment: But what does this look like in practice?

            Programmatic assessment has been identified as a system-oriented approach to achieving the multiple purposes for assessment within Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME, i.e., formative, summative, and program improvement). While there are well-established principles for designing and evaluating programs of assessment, few studies illustrate and critically interpret, what a system of programmatic assessment looks like in practice. This study aims to use systems thinking and the 'two communities' metaphor to interpret a model of programmatic assessment and to identify challenges and opportunities with operationalization.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The use of a portfolio in postgraduate medical education – reflect, assess and account, one for each or all in one?

              Competency-based education has become central to the training and assessment of post-graduate medical trainees or residents [1]. In competency-based education, there is a strong focus on outcomes and professional performance. Typically, holistic tasks are used to train, practice and assess the defined outcomes or competencies. In residency training, these tasks are part of the day-to-day clinical practice. The performance of residents in the workplace needs to be captured and stored. A portfolio has been used as an instrument for storage and collection of workplace-based assessment and feedback in various countries, like the Netherlands and the United States. The collection of information in a portfolio can serve or be used for a variety of purposes. These are: The collection of work samples, assessment, feedback and evaluations in a portfolio enables the learner to look back, analyze and reflect. The content is used for assessment or making decisions about progress. And the portfolio is used as an instrument for quality assurance processes. In post-graduate medical education, these purposes can be combined but this is not always reported transparently. In this paper, we will discuss the different perspectives, how a portfolio can serve these three purposes and what are opportunities and challenges of combining multiple purposes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Med Educ
                Korean J Med Educ
                KJME
                Korean Journal of Medical Education
                Korean Society of Medical Education
                2005-727X
                2005-7288
                June 2020
                28 May 2020
                : 32
                : 2
                : 97-100
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
                [2 ]Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
                [3 ]Division of Neurology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore
                [4 ]Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
                [5 ]Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Ching-Hui Sia ( https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-2869) Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 9, Singapore 119228 Tel: +65.6779.5555 Fax: +65.6779.5678 email: ching_hui_sia@ 123456nuhs.edu.sg
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-2869
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1824-9077
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-7225
                Article
                kjme-2020-157
                10.3946/kjme.2020.157
                7272375
                32486618
                52594d4c-ed00-4232-954e-5148c172d9b7
                © The Korean Society of Medical Education. All rights reserved.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 April 2020
                : 8 May 2020
                : 8 May 2020
                Categories
                Medical Education in the Age of Uncertainty

                Comments

                Comment on this article