15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Intravenous Oxycodone Versus Other Intravenous Strong Opioids for Acute Postoperative Pain Control: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Optimal pain management is crucial to the postoperative recovery process. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous oxycodone with intravenous fentanyl, morphine, sufentanil, pethidine, and hydromorphone for acute postoperative pain.

          Methods

          A systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases was performed for randomized controlled trials published from 2008 through 2017 (inclusive) that evaluated the acute postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous oxycodone against fentanyl, morphine, sufentanil, pethidine, and hydromorphone in adult patients (age ≥ 18 years). Outcomes examined included analgesic consumption, pain intensity levels, side effects, and patient satisfaction.

          Results

          Eleven studies were included in the review; six compared oxycodone with fentanyl, two compared oxycodone with morphine, and three compared oxycodone with sufentanil. There were no eligible studies comparing oxycodone with pethidine or hydromorphone. Overall, analgesic consumption was lower with oxycodone than with fentanyl or sufentanil. Oxycodone exhibited better analgesic efficacy than fentanyl and sufentanil, and comparable analgesic efficacy to morphine. In terms of safety, there was a tendency towards more side effects with oxycodone than with fentanyl, but the incidence of side effects with oxycodone was comparable to morphine and sufentanil. Where patient satisfaction was evaluated, higher satisfaction levels were observed with oxycodone than with sufentanil and comparable satisfaction was noted when comparing oxycodone with fentanyl. Patient satisfaction was not evaluated in the studies comparing oxycodone with morphine.

          Conclusions

          Our findings suggest that intravenous oxycodone provides better analgesic efficacy than fentanyl and sufentanil, and comparable efficacy to morphine with less adverse events such as sedation. No studies comparing intravenous oxycodone with pethidine or hydromorphone were identified in this review. Better alignment of study methodologies for future research in this area is recommended to provide the best evidence base for a meta-analysis.

          Funding

          Mundipharma Singapore Holding Pte Ltd, Singapore.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s40122-019-0122-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Postoperative pain control.

          The effective relief of pain is of the utmost importance to anyone treating patients undergoing surgery. Pain relief has significant physiological benefits; hence, monitoring of pain relief is increasingly becoming an important postoperative quality measure. The goal for postoperative pain management is to reduce or eliminate pain and discomfort with a minimum of side effects. Various agents (opioid vs. nonopioid), routes (oral, intravenous, neuraxial, regional) and modes (patient controlled vs. "as needed") for the treatment of postoperative pain exist. Although traditionally the mainstay of postoperative analgesia is opioid based, increasingly more evidence exists to support a multimodal approach with the intent to reduce opioid side effects (such as nausea and ileus) and improve pain scores. Enhanced recovery protocols to reduce length of stay in colorectal surgery are becoming more prevalent and include multimodal opioid sparing regimens as a critical component. Familiarity with the efficacy of available agents and routes of administration is important to tailor the postoperative regimen to the needs of the individual patient.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Equianalgesic dose ratios for opioids. a critical review and proposals for long-term dosing.

            Clinicians involved in the opioid pharmacotherapy of cancer-related pain should be acquainted with a variety of opioids and be skilled in the selection of doses when the type of opioid or route of administration needs changing. The optimal dose should avoid under-dosing or overdosing, both associated with negative outcomes for the patient. Although equianalgesic dose tables are generally used to determine the new doses in these circumstances, the evidence to support the ratios indicated in these tables largely refers to the context of single dose administration. The applicability of these ratios to the setting of chronic opioid administration has been questioned. A systematic search of published literature from 1966 to September 1999 was conducted to critically appraise the emerging evidence on equianalgesic dose ratios derived from studies of chronic opioid administration. There were six major findings: 1) there exists a general paucity of data related to long-term dosing and studies are heterogeneous in nature; 2) the ratios exhibit extremely wide ranges; 3) methadone is more potent than previously appreciated; 4) the ratios related to methadone are highly correlated with the dose of the previous opioid; 5) the ratio may change according to the direction the opioid switch; and 6) discrepancies exist with respect to both oxycodone and fentanyl. Overall, these findings have important clinical implications for clinicians and warrant consideration in the potential revision of current tables. The complexity of the clinical context in which many switches occur must be recognized and also appreciated in the design of future studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acute pain management: scientific evidence, fourth edition, 2015.

              This guideline summary describes the fourth edition of Acute pain management: scientific evidence, which was published by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) and its Faculty of Pain Medicine (FPMANZCA) in December 2015. The fourth edition summarises the best available evidence on acute pain management, following methods established over the preceding three editions. It provides additional information by scoring the quality of and reporting further details on randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses. The information is condensed into key messages that provide: concise statements on each topic, showing the highest level of evidence; and clinical practice points based on clinical experience or expert opinion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                raffs@iafrica.com
                Journal
                Pain Ther
                Pain Ther
                Pain and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8237
                2193-651X
                19 April 2019
                19 April 2019
                June 2019
                : 8
                : 1
                : 19-39
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Pain Clinic, Christiaan Barnard Memorial Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
                [2 ]Faculté de médecine, Université Paris-Descartes, Pôle d’anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1773 5396, GRID grid.56302.32, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, , King Saud University, ; Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [4 ]The Pain Clinic, Mount Alvernia Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
                [5 ]GRID grid.449706.8, Department of Anesthesia, , University of the East Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Medical Center, ; Quezon City, Philippines
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1773 3278, GRID grid.415670.1, Anesthesiology Institute, , Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, ; Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0470 5905, GRID grid.31501.36, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, , Seoul National University College of Medicine, ; Seoul, Korea
                [8 ]ISNI 0000000120191471, GRID grid.9581.5, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, , Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Ciptomangunkusumo National General Hospital, ; Jakarta, Indonesia
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4666 9789, GRID grid.417168.d, Department of Anesthesiology, , Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, ; Hangzhou, Zhejiang China
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0632 3337, GRID grid.413259.8, Department of Anesthesiology, , Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, ; Beijing, China
                [11 ]Mundipharma Singapore Holding Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Singapore
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-2656
                Article
                122
                10.1007/s40122-019-0122-4
                6514019
                31004317
                526079e0-dbad-4404-ad5f-25ab72671751
                © The Author(s) 2019
                History
                : 3 January 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Mundipharma Singapore Holding Pte Ltd
                Award ID: -
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                acute postoperative pain,fentanyl,hydromorphone,morphine,oxycodone,pethidine,sufentanil

                Comments

                Comment on this article