14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      SLC19A1 transports immunoreactive cyclic dinucleotides

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The accumulation of DNA in the cytosol serves as a key immunostimulatory signal associated with infections, cancer and genomic damage 1, 2 . Cytosolic DNA triggers immune responses by activating the cGAS/STING pathway 3 . The binding of DNA to the cytosolic enzyme cGAMP synthase (cGAS), activates its enzymatic activity, leading to the synthesis of a second messenger, cyclic[G(2’,5’)pA(3’,5’)] (2’3’-cGAMP) 4- 7 . 2’3’-cGAMP, a cyclic dinucleotide (CDN), activates the protein ‘stimulator of interferon genes’ (STING) 8 , which in turn activates the transcription factors IRF3 and NF-κB promoting the transcription of genes encoding type I interferons and other cytokines and mediators that stimulate a broader immune response. Exogenous 2’3’-cGAMP produced by malignant cells 9 and other CDNs, including CDNs produced by bacteria 10- 12 and synthetic CDNs used in cancer immunotherapy 13, 14 , must traverse the cell membrane to activate STING in target cells. How these charged CDNs pass through the lipid bilayer is unknown. Here we used a genome-wide CRISPR interference screen to identify the reduced folate carrier SLC19A1, a folate-organic phosphate antiporter, as the major transporter for CDNs. CDN uptake and functional responses are inhibited by depleting SLC19A1 from human cells and enhanced by overexpressing SLC19A1. In both human cell lines and primary cells ex vivo, CDN uptake is inhibited by folates, as well as two medications approved for treatment of inflammatory diseases, sulfasalazine and the antifolate methotrexate. The identification of SLC19A1 as the major transporter of CDNs into cells has implications for the immunotherapeutic treatment of cancer 13 , host responsiveness to CDN-producing pathogenic microorganisms 11 , and potentially in certain inflammatory diseases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          c-di-AMP secreted by intracellular Listeria monocytogenes activates a host type I interferon response.

          Intracellular bacterial pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, are detected in the cytosol of host immune cells. Induction of this host response is often dependent on microbial secretion systems and, in L. monocytogenes, is dependent on multidrug efflux pumps (MDRs). Using L. monocytogenes mutants that overexpressed MDRs, we identified cyclic diadenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP) as a secreted molecule able to trigger the cytosolic host response. Overexpression of the di-adenylate cyclase, dacA (lmo2120), resulted in elevated levels of the host response during infection. c-di-AMP thus represents a putative bacterial secondary signaling molecule that triggers a cytosolic pathway of innate immunity and is predicted to be present in a wide variety of bacteria and archea.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Recognition of cytosolic DNA activates an IRF3-dependent innate immune response.

            Nucleic acid recognition upon viral infection triggers type I interferon production. Viral RNA is detected by both endosomal, TLR-dependent and cytosolic, RIG-I/MDA5-dependent pathways. TLR9 is the only known sensor of foreign DNA; it is unknown whether innate immune recognition of DNA exists in the cytosol. Here we present evidence that cytosolic DNA activates a potent type I interferon response to the invasive bacterium Listeria monocytogenes. The noninvasive Legionella pneumophila triggers an identical response through its type IV secretion system. Activation of type I interferons by cytosolic DNA is TLR independent and requires IRF3 but occurs without detectable activation of NF-kappaB and MAP kinases. Microarray analyses reveal a unique but overlapping gene-expression program activated by cytosolic DNA compared to TLR9- and RIG-I/MDA5-dependent responses. These findings define an innate immune response to DNA linked to type I interferon production.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tumor-Derived cGAMP Triggers a STING-Mediated Interferon Response in Non-tumor Cells to Activate the NK Cell Response

              Detection of cytosolic DNA by the enzyme cGAS triggers the production of cGAMP, a second messenger that binds and activates the adaptor protein STING, which leads to interferon (IFN) production. Here we found that in vivo , natural killer (NK) cell killing of tumor cells, but not normal cells, depended on STING expression in non-tumor cells. Experiments using transplantable tumor models in STING and cGAS-deficient mice revealed that cGAS expression by tumor cells was critical for tumor rejection by NK cells. In contrast, cGAS expression by host cells was dispensable, suggesting that tumor-derived cGAMP is transferred to non-tumor cells where it activates STING. cGAMP administration triggered STING activation and interferon-β production in myeloid cells and B cells but not NK cells. Our results revealed that the anti-tumor response of NK cells critically depended on the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway similarly to its role in defense against pathogens, and identified tumor-derived cGAMP as a major determinant of tumor immunogenicity with implications for cancer immunotherapy. Marcus et al. find that cGAMP produced by tumor cells triggers the activation of the STING pathway in immune cells within the tumor microenvironment, leading to interferon production by these cells, which in turn activates NK cell anti-tumor immunity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                22 August 2019
                11 September 2019
                September 2019
                11 March 2020
                : 573
                : 7774
                : 434-438
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, and Cancer Research Laboratory, Division of Immunology and Pathogenesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
                [2 ]Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
                [3 ]Innovative Genomics Initiative, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
                [4 ]Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
                [5 ]Aduro Biotech, Inc. Berkeley, CA, 94710, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]correspondence: raulet@ 123456berkeley.edu , tel: 510-642-9521

                Author contributions

                R.D.L., S.A.Z., and N.G. performed and analyzed the experiments, L.O., S.M.M., and G.E.K. assisted with the experiments, S.W. and B.G.G. analyzed the deep-sequencing data and advised on the screen design, R.D.L., S.A.Z., B.G.G., J.E.C., J.J.W., and D.H.R. designed the experiments, R.D.L., S.A.Z., J.J.W., and D.H.R. prepared the manuscript. All authors critically read the manuscript.

                [†]

                current address: HPL, Otto-Stern-Weg 7, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland

                [#]

                equal contribution

                Article
                NIHMS1537254
                10.1038/s41586-019-1553-0
                6785039
                31511694
                52aed3b2-71b1-4788-8878-5dabd4621023

                Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article