6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The German Impact of Future Events Scale (IFES-S): Adaption and Validation for Clinical Samples

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prospective intrusive mental images occur frequently among several psychological disorders. Their assessment is an important tool since the imagination of events can drive future behavior, such as suicidal acts. One valid measure evaluating those prospective images is the impact of future events scale (IFES). However, to date, there is no German equivalent to the English IFES. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to adapt and validate the IFES at hand of a clinical sample and a healthy control sample.After translation, item analyzes were conducted, and as a result, four items were excluded from further analysis resulting in the German short version of the IFES, the IFES-S. Construct validity of the German IFES-S was tested through correlational analysis with convergent and divergent measures. Specificity and sensitivity were assessed through ROC analysis. The German IFES-S showed good internal consistency for the overall measurement with a Cronbach’s α of .93. Additionally, it displayed good convergent and divergent validity. An optimal cutoff score of 23 was established to discriminate between clinical populations and healthy controls. In summary, the German IFES-S promises to be a valid self-report instrument for the assessment of prospective intrusive imagery within the context of clinical samples.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.

          Research on dispositional optimism as assessed by the Life Orientation Test (Scheier & Carver, 1985) has been challenged on the grounds that effects attributed to optimism are indistinguishable from those of unmeasured third variables, most notably, neuroticism. Data from 4,309 subjects show that associations between optimism and both depression and aspects of coping remain significant even when the effects of neuroticism, as well as the effects of trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem, are statistically controlled. Thus, the Life Orientation Test does appear to possess adequate predictive and discriminant validity. Examination of the scale on somewhat different grounds, however, does suggest that future applications can benefit from its revision. Thus, we also describe a minor modification to the Life Orientation Test, along with data bearing on the revised scale's psychometric properties.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain.

            A rapidly growing number of recent studies show that imagining the future depends on much of the same neural machinery that is needed for remembering the past. These findings have led to the concept of the prospective brain; an idea that a crucial function of the brain is to use stored information to imagine, simulate and predict possible future events. We suggest that processes such as memory can be productively re-conceptualized in light of this idea.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Comparing correlated correlation coefficients.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                18 November 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 813
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University Clinic of Ulm , Ulm, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Santosh K Chaturvedi, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), United States

                Reviewed by: Artemis Igoumenou, University College London, United Kingdom; Stefano Barlati, University of Brescia, Italy

                *Correspondence: Julia Kroener, julia.kroener@ 123456uni-ulm.de

                This article was submitted to Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00813
                6875826
                52f84d9f-86d1-43d4-8667-3d3f990616a0
                Copyright © 2019 Kroener, Schaitz, Maier, Connemann and Sosic-Vasic

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 August 2019
                : 15 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 58, Pages: 8, Words: 4902
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                imagery,assessment,questionnaire,prospective imagery,flash-forwards

                Comments

                Comment on this article