37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 10 , 2 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 13 , 14 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 4 , 14 , 14 , 3 , 23 , 24 , 23 , 23 , 14 , 23 , 12 , 6 , 3
      European Heart Journal
      Oxford University Press
      PCI, Drug-eluting stents, Multivessel disease, Coronary artery bypass graft

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To investigate if recent technical and procedural developments in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) significantly influence outcomes in appropriately selected patients with three-vessel (3VD) coronary artery disease.

          Methods and results

          The SYNTAX II study is a multicenter, all-comers, open-label, single arm study that investigated the impact of a contemporary PCI strategy on clinical outcomes in patients with 3VD in 22 centres from four European countries. The SYNTAX-II strategy includes: heart team decision-making utilizing the SYNTAX Score II (a clinical tool combining anatomical and clinical factors), coronary physiology guided revascularisation, implantation of thin strut bioresorbable-polymer drug-eluting stents, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided stent implantation, contemporary chronic total occlusion revascularisation techniques and guideline-directed medical therapy. The rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE [composite of all-cause death, cerebrovascular event, any myocardial infarction and any revascularisation]) at one year was compared to a predefined PCI cohort from the original SYNTAX-I trial selected on the basis of equipoise 4-year mortality between CABG and PCI. As an exploratory endpoint, comparisons were made with the historical CABG cohort of the original SYNTAX-I trial. Overall 708 patients were screened and discussed within the heart team; 454 patients were deemed appropriate to undergo PCI. At one year, the SYNTAX-II strategy was superior to the equipoise-derived SYNTAX-I PCI cohort (MACCE SYNTAX-II 10.6% vs. SYNTAX-I 17.4%; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.85, P = 0.006). This difference was driven by a significant reduction in the incidence of MI (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11–0.70, P = 0.007) and revascularisation (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.9, P = 0.015). Rates of all-cause death (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.27–1.73, P = 0.43) and stroke (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.10–4.89, P = 0.71) were similar. The rate of definite stent thrombosis was significantly lower in SYNTAX-II (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07–0.97, P = 0.045).

          Conclusion

          At one year, clinical outcomes with the SYNTAX-II strategy were associated with improved clinical results compared to the PCI performed in comparable patients from the original SYNTAX-I trial. Longer term follow-up is awaited and a randomized clinical trial with contemporary CABG is warranted.

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

          NCT02015832

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI

          Coronary revascularization guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with better patient outcomes after the procedure than revascularization guided by angiography alone. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II.

            The anatomical SYNTAX score is advocated in European and US guidelines as an instrument to help clinicians decide the optimum revascularisation method in patients with complex coronary artery disease. The absence of an individualised approach and of clinical variables to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limitations of the SYNTAX score. SYNTAX score II aimed to overcome these limitations. SYNTAX score II was developed by applying a Cox proportional hazards model to results of the randomised all comers SYNTAX trial (n=1800). Baseline features with strong associations to 4-year mortality in either the CABG or the PCI settings (interactions), or in both (predictive accuracy), were added to the anatomical SYNTAX score. Comparisons of 4-year mortality predictions between CABG and PCI were made for each patient. Discriminatory performance was quantified by concordance statistics and internally validated with bootstrap resampling. External validation was done in the multinational all comers DELTA registry (n=2891), a heterogeneous population that included patients with three-vessel disease (26%) or complex coronary artery disease (anatomical SYNTAX score ≥33, 30%) who underwent CABG or PCI. The SYNTAX trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00114972. SYNTAX score II contained eight predictors: anatomical SYNTAX score, age, creatinine clearance, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), presence of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease, peripheral vascular disease, female sex, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). SYNTAX score II significantly predicted a difference in 4-year mortality between patients undergoing CABG and those undergoing PCI (p(interaction) 0·0037). To achieve similar 4-year mortality after CABG or PCI, younger patients, women, and patients with reduced LVEF required lower anatomical SYNTAX scores, whereas older patients, patients with ULMCA disease, and those with COPD, required higher anatomical SYNTAX scores. Presence of diabetes was not important for decision making between CABG and PCI (p(interaction) 0·67). SYNTAX score II discriminated well in all patients who underwent CABG or PCI, with concordance indices for internal (SYNTAX trial) validation of 0·725 and for external (DELTA registry) validation of 0·716, which were substantially higher than for the anatomical SYNTAX score alone (concordance indices of 0·567 and 0·612, respectively). A nomogram was constructed that allowed for an accurate individualised prediction of 4-year mortality in patients proposing to undergo CABG or PCI. Long-term (4-year) mortality in patients with complex coronary artery disease can be well predicted by a combination of anatomical and clinical factors in SYNTAX score II. SYNTAX score II can better guide decision making between CABG and PCI than the original anatomical SYNTAX score. Boston Scientific Corporation. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Heart J
                Eur. Heart J
                eurheartj
                European Heart Journal
                Oxford University Press
                0195-668X
                1522-9645
                07 November 2017
                26 August 2017
                26 August 2017
                : 38
                : 42 , Focus Issue on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
                : 3124-3134
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Hospital Cliinico San Carlos IDISSC and Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Calle Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
                [2 ]Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center of Amsterdam, Cardiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam-Zuidoost, the Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Cardiology, Oxford, UK; Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
                [4 ]Department of Cardiology Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK; Knockbracken Healthcare Park, Saintfield Rd, Belfast BT8 8BH, UK
                [5 ]Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Carrer de Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
                [6 ]Department of Cardiology, Imperial College London, London, UK; Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
                [7 ]1st Department of Cardiology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland; Collegium Maius, Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznań, Poland
                [8 ]Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario la Paz, Madrid, Spain; Paseo de la Castellana, 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
                [9 ]Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain; Paseo de San Vicente, 58, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
                [10 ]Department of Cardiology, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23 3RE, UK
                [11 ]Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital and Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK; High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
                [12 ]Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, UK; Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
                [13 ]Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Thomas Dr, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK
                [14 ]Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, the Netherlands; ’s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [15 ]The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; 51 Little France Dr, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
                [16 ]Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain; Av. Valdecilla, 25, 39008 Santander, Cantabria, Spain
                [17 ]American Heart of Poland (PAK), Ustrón, Poland; Sanatoryjna 1, 43-450 Ustrón, Poland
                [18 ]Department of Cardiology, Hospital Meixoeiro, Pontevedra, Spain; Camiño Meixoeiro, s/n, 36214 Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
                [19 ]Department of Cardiology, Hospital Meixoeiro, Pontevedra, Spain; Camiño Meixoeiro, s/n, 36214 Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
                [20 ]Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK; Barry Building, Eastern Rd, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK
                [21 ]Gornoslaskie Centrum Medycnze, Poland; 45/47, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
                [22 ]Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland; Gołȩbia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland
                [23 ]Cardialysis BV, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Westblaak 98, 3012 KM, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [24 ]European Cardiovascular Research Institute, Westblaak 98, 3012 KM, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author. Tel. +31 10 206 2828, Email: patrick.w.j.c.serruys@ 123456pwserruys.com

                See page 3135 for the editorial comment on this article (doi: [Related article:]10.1093/eurheartj/ehx528)

                Article
                ehx512
                10.1093/eurheartj/ehx512
                5837643
                29020367
                54d940a1-be03-4e02-bc5d-f06f4b2b550e
                © The Author 2017. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 30 June 2017
                : 31 July 2017
                : 23 August 2017
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Categories
                Fast Track Clinical Research
                Interventional Cardiology
                Editor's Choice
                Fast Track

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                pci,drug-eluting stents,multivessel disease,coronary artery bypass graft

                Comments

                Comment on this article