50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Leopard ( Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The leopard’s ( Panthera pardus) broad geographic range, remarkable adaptability, and secretive nature have contributed to a misconception that this species might not be severely threatened across its range. We find that not only are several subspecies and regional populations critically endangered but also the overall range loss is greater than the average for terrestrial large carnivores. To assess the leopard’s status, we compile 6,000 records at 2,500 locations from over 1,300 sources on its historic (post 1750) and current distribution. We map the species across Africa and Asia, delineating areas where the species is confirmed present, is possibly present, is possibly extinct or is almost certainly extinct. The leopard now occupies 25–37% of its historic range, but this obscures important differences between subspecies. Of the nine recognized subspecies, three ( P. p. pardus, fusca, and saxicolor) account for 97% of the leopard’s extant range while another three ( P. p. orientalis, nimr, and japonensis) have each lost as much as 98% of their historic range. Isolation, small patch sizes, and few remaining patches further threaten the six subspecies that each have less than 100,000 km 2 of extant range. Approximately 17% of extant leopard range is protected, although some endangered subspecies have far less. We found that while leopard research was increasing, research effort was primarily on the subspecies with the most remaining range whereas subspecies that are most in need of urgent attention were neglected.

          Related collections

          Most cited references114

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern human-dominated landscapes.

            The conservation of large carnivores is a formidable challenge for biodiversity conservation. Using a data set on the past and current status of brown bears (Ursus arctos), Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), gray wolves (Canis lupus), and wolverines (Gulo gulo) in European countries, we show that roughly one-third of mainland Europe hosts at least one large carnivore species, with stable or increasing abundance in most cases in 21st-century records. The reasons for this overall conservation success include protective legislation, supportive public opinion, and a variety of practices making coexistence between large carnivores and people possible. The European situation reveals that large carnivores and people can share the same landscape. Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.

              Large carnivores face serious threats and are experiencing massive declines in their populations and geographic ranges around the world. We highlight how these threats have affected the conservation status and ecological functioning of the 31 largest mammalian carnivores on Earth. Consistent with theory, empirical studies increasingly show that large carnivores have substantial effects on the structure and function of diverse ecosystems. Significant cascading trophic interactions, mediated by their prey or sympatric mesopredators, arise when some of these carnivores are extirpated from or repatriated to ecosystems. Unexpected effects of trophic cascades on various taxa and processes include changes to bird, mammal, invertebrate, and herpetofauna abundance or richness; subsidies to scavengers; altered disease dynamics; carbon sequestration; modified stream morphology; and crop damage. Promoting tolerance and coexistence with large carnivores is a crucial societal challenge that will ultimately determine the fate of Earth's largest carnivores and all that depends upon them, including humans.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Francisco, USA )
                2167-8359
                4 May 2016
                2016
                : 4
                : e1974
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London , London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Department of Geography, University College London , London, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Big Cats Initiative, National Geographic Society , Washington, D.C., United States
                [4 ]BIOGEOMAPS , Vienna, Austria
                [5 ]Department of Biological Sciences, Fordham University , Bronx, NY, United States
                [6 ]IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group, c/o KORA , Bern, Switzerland
                [7 ]Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx Zoo , Bronx, NY, United States
                [8 ]Iranian Cheetah Society (ICS) , Tehran, Iran
                [9 ]Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford , Tubney, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
                [10 ]Panthera , New York, NY, United States
                [11 ]The Wildlife Institute, Beijing Forestry University , Beijing, China
                [12 ]Landmark College , Putney, VT, United States
                [13 ]Department of Biology, Pfeiffer University , Misenheimer, NC, United States
                [14 ]Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
                Article
                1974
                10.7717/peerj.1974
                4861552
                27168983
                54f4b922-2a85-4866-a594-28cf83217e4d
                © 2016 Jacobson et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 31 December 2015
                : 5 April 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: National Geographic Society’s Big Cats Initiative
                Award ID: SP08-11
                Funded by: Mohamed bin Zayed Conservation Fund
                Award ID: #10251555
                Funded by: Robertson Foundation
                Andrew Jacobson was supported by a fellowship from National Geographic Society’s Big Cats Initiative (grant SP08-11) and the Mohamed bin Zayed Conservation Fund (#10251555). Mohammad Farhadinia was funded by a grant from the Robertson Foundation through WildCRU. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Conservation Biology
                Ecology
                Zoology

                leopard,panthera pardus,decline,distribution,carnivore conservation

                Comments

                Comment on this article