6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predictors of Adverse Outcomes of Patients with Chest Pain and Primary Diagnosis of Non-Cardiac Pain at the Time of Discharge from Emergency Department: A 30-Days Prospective Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Chest pain is a common symptom for referring patients to emergency departments (ED). Among those referred, some are admitted to hospitals with a definite or tentative diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome and some are discharged with primary diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain. This study aimed at investigating 30 days' adverse outcomes of patients discharged from ED of a major heart center in Iran.

          Methods

          Out of 1638 chest pain admissions to the centre during 2010–2011, 962 patients (mean age= 50.9±15.9 years) who were admitted to Afshar Heart Center's ED with chest pain as their chief complaint, and discharged with primary diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain, were followed for any adverse cardiac events 30 days post discharge. The adverse events were: unstable angina, non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ST elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), coronary revascularization (percutaneous angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting) and death.

          Results

          Adverse cardiac events, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularization and death were observed in 30 patients (3.1%) including: acute MI n=5 (0.5%, sudden cardiac death inn=1 (0.1%, coronary revascularization in n=8 (0.8%) and hospitalization due to unstable angina/NSTEMI in n=16 (1–7%). Adverse events were seen more frequently in patients with history of hypertension, dyslipidemia and previous coronary artery disease. In univariate analysis, the chance of postdischarge adverse cardiac events was higher in patients with hypertension (OR=9.36, CI=3.24–27.03), previous coronary artery disease (OR= 3.8, CI=1.78–8.0), dyslipidemia (OR=3.5, CI=1.7–7.38) and discharge against medical advice (OR=2.85, CI= 1.37–5.91).

          Conclusion

          The extent of adverse cardiac events in patients with a primary diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain within 30 days of discharge was significant, mandating nation-wide registries to provide better care for these patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Who leaves against medical advice?

            Patients who leave hospitals against medical advice (AMA) frustrate physicians and may put themselves at medical risk. A case-control study was conducted to characterize the factors associated with AMA discharges from an impatient medical service. Logistic regression analysis indicated that not having a primary care physician and previous AMA discharge were significantly associated with leaving AMA. The patients most often stated that they were leaving because they "felt better" or had personal or financial obligations. However, the patients leaving AMA were more likely to return for care within the next week than were the control patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort.

              Most Canadian emergency departments use an unstructured, individualized approach to patients with chest pain, without data to support the safety and efficiency of this practice. We sought to determine the proportions of patients with chest discomfort in emergency departments who either had acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and were inappropriately discharged from the emergency department or did not have ACS and were held for investigation. Consecutive consenting patients aged 25 years or older presenting with chest discomfort to 2 urban tertiary care emergency departments between June 2000 and April 2001 were prospectively enrolled unless they had a terminal illness, an obvious traumatic cause, a radiographically identifiable cause, severe communication problems or no fixed address in British Columbia or they would not be available for follow-up by telephone. At 30 days we assigned predefined explicit outcome diagnoses: definite ACS (acute myocardial infarction [AMI] or definite unstable angina) or no ACS. Of 1819 patients, 241 (13.2%) were assigned a 30-day diagnosis of AMI and 157 (8.6%), definite unstable angina. Of these 398 patients, 21 (5.3%) were discharged from the emergency department without a diagnosis of ACS and without plans for further investigation. The clinical sensitivity for detecting ACS was 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.5%- 96.9%) and the specificity 73.8% (95% CI 71.5%- 76.0%). Of the patients without ACS or an adverse event, 71.1% were admitted to hospital or held in the emergency department for more than 3 hours. The current individualized approach to evaluation and disposition of patients with chest discomfort in 2 Canadian tertiary care emergency departments misses 5.3% of cases of ACS while consuming considerable health care resources for patients without coronary disease. Opportunities exist to improve both safety and efficiency.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ethiop J Health Sci
                Ethiop J Health Sci
                Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences
                Research and Publications Office of Jimma University (Jimma, Ethiopia )
                1029-1857
                July 2016
                : 26
                : 4
                : 305-310
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Yazd Cardiovascular Research Centre, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
                [2 ]Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center, Tehran. Iran
                [3 ]Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
                [4 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Masoud Mirzaei, mmirzaei@ 123456ssu.ac.ir
                Article
                jEJHS.v26.i4.pg305
                10.4314/ejhs.v26i4.2
                4992770
                27587928
                557f396f-c533-4285-9ced-5a86c89f50c2
                Copyright © Jimma University, Research & Publications Office 2016
                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Medicine
                chest pain,non-cardiac,cardiac,emergency,discharge,outcome
                Medicine
                chest pain, non-cardiac, cardiac, emergency, discharge, outcome

                Comments

                Comment on this article