2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      MO180: Reactogenicity of MRNA-1273 Vaccine in Patients on Haemodialysis

      abstract

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND AND AIMS

          mRNA-1273 vaccine (previously known as vaccine Moderna) has shown 94.1% efficacy at preventing COVID-19 illness in the general population. Vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) were usually mild or moderate in intensity and resolved within a few days. Nevertheless, the fear of developing AEs led some patients on haemodialysis to deny vaccination or additional booster doses. No studies have been conducted to evaluate the reactogenicity of the mRNA-1273 vaccine in dialysis patients. To inform public health and clinical practice, we investigated the safety of the mRNA-1273 vaccine in a cohort of patients on haemodialysis.

          METHOD

          We conducted a retrospective analysis of in-centre haemodialysis patients without a prior COVID-19 diagnosis who underwent mRNA-1273 vaccine from 1 March to 30 April 2021. mRNA-1273 vaccine was performed in all patients without signs of ongoing infection or COVID-19 who provided written consent from 24 March to 30 April 2021.

          AEs occurring after the first and the second doses were collected and classified as local or systemic.

          RESULTS

          Overall, 126 patients on chronic maintenance dialysis were vaccinated with two doses of mRNA-1273 vaccine. Mean age was 68 (IQR, 54.7–76) years and 53.6% of patients were aged ≥65 years (Table  1). AEs occurred in 57.9% and 61.9% of patients after the first dose and second dose, respectively. The most common AEs were injection-site pain (61.9%), erythema (4.8%), itching (4.8%), swelling (16.7%), axillary swelling/tenderness (2.4%), fever (17.5%) headache (7.9%), fatigue (23.8%), myalgia (17.5%), arthralgia (12.7%), dyspnoea (2.4%), nausea/vomiting (7.1%), diarrhoea (5.6%), shivers (4%) and vertigo (1.6%).

          Table 1.

          Demographic and clinical characteristics of haemodialysis patients who underwent RNA-1273 vaccine administration

          Basal characteristics All patients
          (n = 126)
          Age (year) 68 (54.7–6)
           (range) 19–92
           ≥ 65 years 71 (56.3)
          Males, n (%) 71 (56.31)
          Ethnic origin, n. (%)  
           Caucasian 110 (87.3)
           African 15 (11.9)
           Hispanic 1 (0.8)
          Etiology of ESRD, n. (%)  
           Nephrosclerosis 54 (42.9)
           Glomerulonephritis 26 (20.6)
           Diabetes 14 (11.1)
           ADPKD 4 (3.2)
           Nephrotoxic 4 (3.2)
           Pyelonephritis 4 (3.2)
           Interstitial 3 (2.4)
           HIVAN 2 (1.6)
           Others 10 (7.9)
           NA 5 (4)
          HD treatment schedule, n (%)  
           3 times per week 115 (91.2)
           2 times per week 7 (5.5)
           4 times per week 4 (3.1)
          Infectious disease, n. (%)  
           HBV 3 (2.3)
           HCV 3 (2.3)
           HIV 2 (1.5)
          Time elapsed from the first to the second dose of vaccine, day 28 (28–28)
          Follow-up, day 68 (66–70)

          ESRD, end-stage renal disease; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.

          The rates of local AEs were similar after the first and second doses ( P = .8), whereas systemic AEs occurred more frequently after the second dose ( P = .001). Fever ( P = .03), fatigue ( P = .02) and nausea/vomiting ( P = .03) were significantly more frequent after the second dose of the vaccine (Figure  1). Analysis of the data detected statistically significant differences in duration of axillary swelling/tenderness ( P = .07) and diarrhoea ( P = .02) between the first and second. In both cases, these symptoms lasted longer after the second dose of the vaccine. There were no age-related differences in the rate of AEs between older (≥65 years) and younger participants (18–64 years). Lastly, we noted a lower rate of AEs in hemodialysis patients after the first dose (57.9% versus 84.2%) and second doses (61.9% versus 88.6%) compared to the general population.

          FIGURE 1:

          Number of patients who experienced AEs after the two doses.

          CONCLUSION

          RNA-1273 vaccine was associated with the development of transient AEs after the first (57.9%) and second doses (61.9%) in patients on haemodialysis. Systemic AEs were more common after the second dose than the first dose of vaccine. The duration of AEs lasted for a few days, without any apparent consequences. These data confirm the safety of the RNA-1273 vaccine in haemodialysis patients and support the promotion of COVID-19 vaccination in hesitant patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Nephrol Dial Transplant
          Nephrol Dial Transplant
          ndt
          Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
          Oxford University Press
          0931-0509
          1460-2385
          May 2022
          03 May 2022
          03 May 2022
          : 37
          : Suppl 3
          : gfac066.082
          Affiliations
          University Hospital of Modena, Nephrology , Modena, Italy
          University Hospital of Modena, Nephrology , Modena, Italy
          University Hospital of Modena, Nephrology , Modena, Italy
          University Hospital of Modena, Nephrology , Modena, Italy
          University Hospital of Modena, Nephrology , Modena, Italy
          University Hospital of Modena, Nephrology , Modena, Italy
          University Hospital of Modena, Nephrology , Modena, Italy
          University Hospital of Modena, Nephrology , Modena, Italy
          Article
          gfac066.082
          10.1093/ndt/gfac066.082
          9383892
          55a124cb-6271-4d45-89ff-b0ee7a3d5502
          © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

          This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

          History
          Categories
          Clinical Nephrology
          AcademicSubjects/MED00340

          Nephrology
          Nephrology

          Comments

          Comment on this article