3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A snake in the grass: retroperitoneal abscess due to perforated appendicitis—management, approach and recommendations

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A perforated retrocecal appendix resulting in a retroperitoneal abscess is a rare complication of a common disease. The first description of this condition was published in 1948. We present a case involving a 50-year-old woman who presented with abdominal pain inconsistent with the typical presentation of acute appendicitis and was eventually found to have a perforated retrocecal appendix accompanied by a retroperitoneal abscess. The patient was diagnosed using CT and operated upon but unfortunately had a resistant inflammatory process that led to persistent pus drainage from the abdomen despite multiple evacuation attempts and a prolonged hospital stay. In such cases, if the source of this type of inflammatory process has not yet been controlled or even identified, we recommend a second surgical examination, with additional surgical examinations as needed, and offer other suggestions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Acute appendicitis: review and update.

          Appendicitis is common, with a lifetime occurrence of 7 percent. Abdominal pain and anorexia are the predominant symptoms. The most important physical examination finding is right lower quadrant tenderness to palpation. A complete blood count and urinalysis are sometimes helpful in determining the diagnosis and supporting the presence or absence of appendicitis, while appendiceal computed tomographic scans and ultrasonography can be helpful in equivocal cases. Delay in diagnosing appendicitis increases the risk of perforation and complications. Complication and mortality rates are much higher in children and the elderly.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Extensive retroperitoneal and right thigh abscess in a patient with ruptured retrocecal appendicitis: an extremely fulminant form of a common disease.

            As a disease commonly encountered in daily practice, acute appendicitis is usually diagnosed and managed easily with a low mortality and morbidity rate. However, acute appendicitis may occasionally become extraordinarily complicated and life threatening. A 56-year-old man, healthy prior to this admission, was brought to the hospital due to spiking high fever, poor appetite, dysuria, progressive right flank and painful swelling of the thigh for 3 d. Significant inflammatory change of soft tissue was noted, involving the entire right trunk from the subcostal margin to the knee joint. Painful disability of the right lower extremity and apparent signs of peritonitis at the right lower abdomen were disclosed. Laboratory results revealed leukocytosis and an elevated C-reactive protein level. Abdominal CT revealed several communicated gas-containing abscesses at the right retroperitoneal region with mass effect, pushing the duodenum and the pancreatic head upward, compressing and encasing inferior vena cava, destroying psoas muscle and dissecting downward into the right thigh. Laparotomy and right thigh exploration were performed immediately and about 500 mL of frank pus was drained. A ruptured retrocecal appendix was the cause of the abscess. The patient fully recovered at the end of the third post-operation week. This case reminds us that acute appendicitis should be treated carefully on an emergency basis to avoid serious complications. CT scan is the diagnostic tool of choice, with rapid evaluation followed by adequate drainage as the key to the survival of the patient.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Retroperitoneal abscess resulting from perforated acute appendicitis: analysis of its management and outcome.

              Acute appendicitis may become life threatening if it is complicated by retroperitoneal abscess. To the best of our knowledge, only case reports have been documented; thus, we analyzed the published experiences and reviewed this issue. In addition to two patients treated at our institution, a PubMed search identified 22 cases of acute appendicitis, complicated by retroperitoneal abscess, reported by 18 authors between 1955 and 2005. The patients' characteristics, onset of symptoms, timing and methods of diagnosis and management, and outcome are reviewed and analyzed. Most of the patients were adults (21/24, 87.5%), of whom seven were older than 65 years. None of the patients presented with the classical symptoms of acute appendicitis at the onset of the disease, and less than half (9/24) reported abdominal pain. The average interval between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis was 16 days, and the most effective diagnostic tool was computed tomography. Pathogens were usually polymicrobial, and appendectomy followed by adequate drainage of the abscess was the best treatment. The mortality rate was 16.7% (4/24), and all deaths were caused by profound sepsis. According to the available data, the average hospital stay was 27.3 days for the survivors. The formation of complicated retroperitoneal abscesses involving thigh, psoas muscle, perinephric space, or even the lateral abdominal wall is a serious complication of perforated acute appendicitis. An intra-abdominal pathological abnormality cannot be excluded in a patient presenting without abdominal symptoms. The mortality rate can only be reduced by a high index of suspicion, accurate diagnosis, and appropriate treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Surg Case Rep
                J Surg Case Rep
                jscr
                Journal of Surgical Case Reports
                Oxford University Press
                2042-8812
                May 2019
                28 May 2019
                28 May 2019
                : 2019
                : 5
                : rjz163
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Critical Care Medicine Doctor, Adult Critical Care Medicine Department at King Fahad Hospital - Madinah, Saudi Arabia
                [2 ]Critical Care Medicine Doctor, Critical Care Medicine Department at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre - Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [3 ]Interventional & Diagnostic Radiology Consultant, Zagazig University, Egypt
                [4 ]Critical Care Medicine Consultant, Adult Critical Care Medicine Department at King Fahad Hospital - Madinah, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes
                Correspondence address. Critical Care Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, P.O. Box 3354, Riyadh 11211. E-mail: neno_farneno@ 123456hotmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0916-5165
                Article
                rjz163
                10.1093/jscr/rjz163
                6537909
                31186833
                55d214d7-ca1a-4b8e-9a6b-692ccadab8d6
                Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com

                History
                : 20 April 2019
                : 06 May 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 3
                Categories
                Case Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article