27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A comparison between some standardized scales of evaluation of anxiety and depression in nursing staff

      abstract
      1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 3 , ,   1
      Critical Care
      BioMed Central
      20th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
      21-24 March 2000

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Full text Anxiety and depression can be evaluated through different methods. We studied the current associations between the commonest evaluation methods that are present in scientific literature. Materials and methods We analyzed a population of 1392 nurses working in intensive care units (ICUs) and in general medicine units (GMUs), distributed in 101 Italian hospitals (with a mean age of 32± 6.9 years, 73.8 % female). We considered the following evaluation scales: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, divided in anxiety (HAD A) and depression (HAD D) status; the STAI scale, divided in acute anxiety (Y-1) and chronic anxiety (Y-2) status; the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI.), divided in Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP) and Personal Accomplishment (PA). Assuming the HAD as a reference scale, we evaluated the influence of the others scales to determine HAD. The population was divided, distinctly for anxiety and depression, into three groups, according to standardized parameters of HAD - `non-cases' (HAD 0-7), `doubtful cases' (HAD 8-10), and `cases' (HAD 11-21). We used multiple linear regression models; statistical significance was accepted as P<0.05. Results The regression coefficients of the multiple linear regression models are expressed in the table, with the variables that result in statistical significance. For depression, we considered doubtful cases and cases together (last being only 39). Conclusions 1) Besides HAD A, STAI Y-2 also seems to be useful for evaluating anxiety, whatever the degree of it. 2) Besides HAD D, STAI Y-1 and MBI EE also seem to be useful for evaluating depression, whatever the degree of it. Table HAD A r = 0.75 HAD D P < 0.001 P < 0.001 S.T.A.I. Y-1 P < 0.001 S.T.A.I. Y-2 P < 0.001 EE P < 0.001 HAD A 0-7 r = 0.46 S.T.A.I. Y-1 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 S.T.A.I. Y-2 P < 0.001 EE P < 0.001 HAD A 8-10 r = 0.27 HAD D P < 0.05 P < 0.001 S.T.A.I. Y-2 P < 0.05 HAD A 11-21 r = 0.55 HAD D P < 0.001 P < 0.001 S.T.A.I. Y-1 P < 0.05 S.T.A.I. Y-2 P < 0.05 HAD D r = 0.69 HAD A P < 0.001 P < 0.001 S.T.A.I. Y-1 P < 0.001 S.T.A.I. Y-2 P < 0.001 EE P < 0.001 PA P < 0.001 HAD D 0-7 r = 0.52 HAD A P < 0.001 P < 0.001 S.T.A.I. Y-1 P < 0.001 S.T.A.I. Y-2 P < 0.001 EE P < 0.001 HAD D 8-21 r = 0.49 S.T.A.I. Y-1 P < 0.05 P < 0.001 EE P < 0.05

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Conference
          Crit Care
          Crit Care
          Critical Care
          BioMed Central
          1364-8535
          1466-609X
          2000
          21 March 2000
          : 4
          : Suppl 1
          : P231
          Affiliations
          [1 ]1st. di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi, Osp. Maggiore di Milano-IRCCS, Italy
          [2 ]Dip. di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
          [3 ]Ospedale Civico diLugano, Switzerland
          Article
          cc950
          10.1186/cc950
          3333153
          55e49111-4945-4831-b3b2-a6ff39bd390c
          Copyright ©2000 Current Science Ltd
          20th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
          Brussels, Belgium
          21-24 March 2000
          History
          Categories
          Meeting Abstract

          Emergency medicine & Trauma
          Emergency medicine & Trauma

          Comments

          Comment on this article