0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intra-Patient Heterogeneity of Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA in Blood of Melanoma Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite remarkable progress in melanoma therapy, the exceptional heterogeneity of the disease has prevented the development of reliable companion biomarkers for the prediction or monitoring of therapy responses. Here, we show that difficulties in detecting blood-based markers, like circulating tumor cells (CTC), might arise from the translation of the mutational heterogeneity of melanoma cells towards their surface marker expression. We provide a unique method, which enables the molecular characterization of clinically relevant CTC subsets, as well as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), from a single blood sample. The study demonstrates the benefit of a combined analysis of ctDNA and CTC counts in melanoma patients, revealing that CTC subsets and ctDNA provide synergistic real-time information on the mutational status, RNA and protein expression of melanoma cells in individual patients, in relation to clinical outcome.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.

          To revise the staging system for cutaneous melanoma on the basis of data from an expanded American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Melanoma Staging Database. The melanoma staging recommendations were made on the basis of a multivariate analysis of 30,946 patients with stages I, II, and III melanoma and 7,972 patients with stage IV melanoma to revise and clarify TNM classifications and stage grouping criteria. Findings and new definitions include the following: (1) in patients with localized melanoma, tumor thickness, mitotic rate (histologically defined as mitoses/mm(2)), and ulceration were the most dominant prognostic factors. (2) Mitotic rate replaces level of invasion as a primary criterion for defining T1b melanomas. (3) Among the 3,307 patients with regional metastases, components that defined the N category were the number of metastatic nodes, tumor burden, and ulceration of the primary melanoma. (4) For staging purposes, all patients with microscopic nodal metastases, regardless of extent of tumor burden, are classified as stage III. Micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry are specifically included. (5) On the basis of a multivariate analysis of patients with distant metastases, the two dominant components in defining the M category continue to be the site of distant metastases (nonvisceral v lung v all other visceral metastatic sites) and an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level. Using an evidence-based approach, revisions to the AJCC melanoma staging system have been made that reflect our improved understanding of this disease. These revisions will be formally incorporated into the seventh edition (2009) of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and implemented by early 2010.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Liquid biopsy and minimal residual disease — latest advances and implications for cure

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              S100 proteins in cancer.

              In humans, the S100 protein family is composed of 21 members that exhibit a high degree of structural similarity, but are not functionally interchangeable. This family of proteins modulates cellular responses by functioning both as intracellular Ca(2+) sensors and as extracellular factors. Dysregulated expression of multiple members of the S100 family is a common feature of human cancers, with each type of cancer showing a unique S100 protein profile or signature. Emerging in vivo evidence indicates that the biology of most S100 proteins is complex and multifactorial, and that these proteins actively contribute to tumorigenic processes such as cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis and immune evasion. Drug discovery efforts have identified leads for inhibiting several S100 family members, and two of the identified inhibitors have progressed to clinical trials in patients with cancer. This Review highlights new findings regarding the role of S100 family members in cancer diagnosis and treatment, the contribution of S100 signalling to tumour biology, and the discovery and development of S100 inhibitors for treating cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                29 October 2019
                November 2019
                : 11
                : 11
                : 1685
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute for Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of the Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; roeck@ 123456hhu.de (K.G.); soeren.twarock@ 123456hhu.de (S.T.); jens.fischer@ 123456uni-duesseldorf.de (J.W.F.)
                [2 ]Department of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; l.wiltfang@ 123456uke.de (L.W.); t.gorges@ 123456uke.de (T.M.G.); l.keller@ 123456uke.de (L.K.); a.babayan@ 123456uke.de (A.B.)
                [3 ]Agena Bioscience GmbH, 22761 Hamburg, Germany; alexander.sartori@ 123456agenabio.com
                [4 ]Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; l.hildebrandt@ 123456uke.de (L.H.); st.schneider@ 123456uke.de (S.W.S.)
                [5 ]Department of Dermatology, Elbe Kliniken, 21614 Buxtehude, Germany; beate.volkmer@ 123456elbekliniken.de (B.V.); peter.mohr@ 123456elbekliniken.de (P.M.)
                [6 ]Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; s.peine@ 123456uke.de
                [7 ]DermatoMed, 22303 Hamburg, Germany; dermatomed@ 123456arztzentrum.de
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: pantel@ 123456uke.de ; Tel.: +49-40-741053503
                [†]

                Joint authorship.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-9760
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4679-7137
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5736-2772
                Article
                cancers-11-01685
                10.3390/cancers11111685
                6896052
                31671846
                5681988f-4a8c-4479-af78-21be71bba243
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 September 2019
                : 25 October 2019
                Categories
                Article

                melanoma,ctdna,ctc,liquid biopsy
                melanoma, ctdna, ctc, liquid biopsy

                Comments

                Comment on this article