3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for nonischemic diabetic ulcers: A systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Diabetic foot ulcers are a common complication of diabetes, which affects 25% of patients and may ultimately lead to amputation of affected limbs. Research suggests hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves healing of these ulcers. However, this has not been reflected in previous reviews, possibly because they did not differentiate between patients with and without peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of published literature in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases on nonischemic diabetic foot ulcers with outcome measures including complete ulcer healing, amputation rate (major and minor), and mortality. Seven studies were included, of which two were randomized clinical trials. Two studies found no difference in major amputation rate, whereas one large retrospective study found 2% more major amputations in the hyperbaric oxygen group. However, this study did not correct for baseline differences. Two studies showed no significant difference in minor amputation rate. Five studies reporting on complete wound healing showed no significant differences. In conclusion, the current evidence suggests that hyperbaric oxygen therapy does not accelerate wound healing and does not prevent major or minor amputations in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer without peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Based on the available evidence, routine clinical use of this therapy cannot be recommended. However, the available research for this specific subgroup of patients is scarce, and physicians should counsel patients on expected risks and benefits. Additional research, focusing especially on patient selection criteria, is needed to better identify patients that might profit from this therapy modality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Oxygen in acute and chronic wound healing.

          Oxygen is a prerequisite for successful wound healing due to the increased demand for reparative processes such as cell proliferation, bacterial defence, angiogenesis and collagen synthesis. Even though the role of oxygen in wound healing is not yet completely understood, many experimental and clinical observations have shown wound healing to be impaired under hypoxia. This article provides an overview on the role of oxygen in wound healing and chronic wound pathogenesis, a brief insight into systemic and topical oxygen treatment, and a discussion of the role of wound tissue oximetry. Thus, the aim is to improve the understanding of the role of oxygen in wound healing and to advance our management of wound patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.

            Some authors argue that systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention studies should include only randomized controlled trials because the randomized controlled trial is a more valid study design for causal inference compared with the observational study design. However, a review of the principal elements underlying this claim (randomization removes the chance of confounding, and the double-blind process minimizes biases caused by the placebo effect) suggests that both classes of study designs have strengths and weaknesses, and including information from observational studies may improve the inference based on only randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, a review of empirical studies suggests that meta-analyses based on observational studies generally produce estimates of effect similar to those from meta-analyses based on randomized controlled trials. The authors found that the advantages of including both observational studies and randomized studies in a meta-analysis could outweigh the disadvantages in many situations and that observational studies should not be excluded a priori.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Facilitates Healing of Chronic Foot Ulcers in Patients With Diabetes

              OBJECTIVE Chronic diabetic foot ulcers are a source of major concern for both patients and health care systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Diabetics with Chronic Foot Ulcers (HODFU) study was a randomized, single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The outcomes for the group receiving HBOT were compared with those of the group receiving treatment with hyperbaric air. Treatments were given in a multi-place hyperbaric chamber for 85-min daily (session duration 95 min), five days a week for eight weeks (40 treatment sessions). The study was performed in an ambulatory setting. RESULTS Ninety-four patients with Wagner grade 2, 3, or 4 ulcers, which had been present for >3 months, were studied. In the intention-to-treat analysis, complete healing of the index ulcer was achieved in 37 patients at 1-year of follow-up: 25/48 (52%) in the HBOT group and 12/42 (29%) in the placebo group (P = 0.03). In a sub-analysis of those patients completing >35 HBOT sessions, healing of the index ulcer occurred in 23/38 (61%) in the HBOT group and 10/37 (27%) in the placebo group (P = 0.009). The frequency of adverse events was low. CONCLUSIONS The HODFU study showed that adjunctive treatment with HBOT facilitates healing of chronic foot ulcers in selected patients with diabetes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                r.lalieu@hgcrijswijk.nl
                Journal
                Wound Repair Regen
                Wound Repair Regen
                10.1111/(ISSN)1524-475X
                WRR
                Wound Repair and Regeneration
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1067-1927
                1524-475X
                26 November 2019
                Mar-Apr 2020
                : 28
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1111/wrr.v28.2 )
                : 266-275
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Hyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum Rijswijk The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Department of Surgery Alrijne Hospital Leiderdorp The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Academic Medical Center, Department of Surgery Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 4 ] Ministry of Defense Defense Healthcare Organization Utrecht The Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Department of Surgery Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
                [ 6 ] Academic Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Reprint requests:

                Rutger Lalieu, Hyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum, Treubstraat 5A, 2288EG Rijswijk, The Netherlands. Tel: +3170 406 3195; Fax: +3170 406 3196

                Email: r.lalieu@ 123456hgcrijswijk.nl

                [†]

                Both authors equally contributed to this paper

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4181-1451
                Article
                WRR12776
                10.1111/wrr.12776
                7079107
                31667898
                56a75cf5-56a6-4c3c-9390-3a1449e6f21f
                © 2019 The Authors. Wound Repair and Regeneration published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of by the Wound Healing Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 June 2019
                : 28 August 2019
                : 24 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Pages: 10, Words: 7015
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Systematic Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March/April 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.8 mode:remove_FC converted:18.03.2020

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article