Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tuberculosis — United States, 2019

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since 1989, the United States has pursued a goal of eliminating tuberculosis (TB) through a strategy of rapidly identifying and treating cases and evaluating exposed contacts to limit secondary cases resulting from recent TB transmission ( 1 ). This strategy has been highly effective in reducing U.S. TB incidence ( 2 ), but the pace of decline has significantly slowed in recent years (2.2% average annual decline during 2012–2017 compared with 6.7% during 2007–2012) ( 3 ). For this report, provisional 2019 data reported to CDC’s National Tuberculosis Surveillance System were analyzed to determine TB incidence overall and for selected subpopulations and these results were compared with those from previous years. During 2019, a total of 8,920 new cases were provisionally reported in the United States, representing a 1.1% decrease from 2018.* TB incidence decreased to 2.7 cases per 100,000 persons, a 1.6% decrease from 2018. Non–U.S.-born persons had a TB rate 15.5 times greater than the rate among U.S.-born persons. The U.S. TB case count and rate are the lowest ever reported, but the pace of decline remains slow. In recent years, approximately 80% of U.S. TB cases have been attributed to reactivation of latent TB infection (LTBI) acquired years in the past, often outside the United States ( 2 ). An expanded TB elimination strategy for this new decade should leverage existing health care resources, including primary care providers, to identify and treat persons with LTBI, without diverting public health resources from the continued need to limit TB transmission within the United States. Partnerships with health care providers, including private providers, are essential for this strategy’s success. Health departments in the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia (DC) report all TB cases that meet the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists’ surveillance case definition † to CDC. Reports include patient demographics, clinical features, and medical and social risk factors. Self-reported race/ethnicity data are collected and reported following federal standards; Hispanics/Latinos can be of any race, and all other reported race categories are non-Hispanic/Latino. The U.S. Census Bureau defines a U.S.-born person as one born in the United States or a U.S. territory or born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent. Rates (cases per 100,000 persons) were calculated for the United States and administrative divisions (i.e., the 50 states, DC, and census divisions) using midyear U.S. Census Bureau population estimates. § Rates by national origin and race/ethnicity were calculated using midyear Current Population Survey estimates. ¶ Average annual percentage changes (APC) in incidence were calculated for 2007–2012 and 2012–2019; these years were selected based on previous research demonstrating a statistically significant change in incidence trends during 2007 and 2012 ( 3 ). Data regarding drug-resistant TB cases are reported for 2018, the most recent year for which complete drug-resistance data are available. U.S. TB incidence decreased an average of 2.1% per year during 2012–2019, a slower rate of decline than the average 6.4% per year during 2007–2012. The overall U.S. TB rate for 2019 was 2.7 cases per 100,000 persons, while state-specific 2019 TB rates ranged from 0.2 (Wyoming) to 8.1 (Alaska) (Table 1). Nine states (Alaska, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Texas, and Washington) and DC reported TB rates higher than the national rate. Four states (California, Florida, New York, and Texas) continued to account for approximately half of all reported TB cases. TABLE 1 Tuberculosis (TB) case counts and rates with annual percentage changes, by U.S. Census division and state or district — United States, 2018 and 2019 Census division/State No. of reported TB cases* TB rate† 2018 2019 % change 2018 2019 % change§ Division 1: New England Connecticut 51 67 31.4 1.4 1.9 31.6 Maine 14 19 35.7 1.0 1.4 35.2 Massachusetts 200 179 –10.5 2.9 2.6 –10.6 New Hampshire 12 6 –50.0 0.9 0.4 –50.2 Rhode Island 20 14 –30.0 1.9 1.3 –30.1 Vermont 5 3 –40.0 0.8 0.5 –40.0 Subtotal 302 288 –4.6 2.0 1.9 –4.7 Division 2: Middle Atlantic New Jersey 291 311 6.9 3.3 3.5 6.9 New York 744 754 1.3 3.8 3.9 1.7 Pennsylvania 213 198 –7.0 1.7 1.5 –7.1 Subtotal 1,248 1,263 1.2 3.0 3.1 1.4 Division 3: East North Central Illinois 319 327 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.9 Indiana 116 108 –6.9 1.7 1.6 –7.4 Michigan 108 132 22.2 1.1 1.3 22.2 Ohio 178 150 –15.7 1.5 1.3 –15.8 Wisconsin 49 51 4.1 0.8 0.9 3.8 Subtotal 770 768 –0.3 1.6 1.6 –0.3 Division 4: West North Central Iowa 49 52 6.1 1.6 1.6 5.9 Kansas 28 38 35.7 1.0 1.3 35.6 Minnesota 172 147 –14.5 3.1 2.6 –15.0 Missouri 80 70 –12.5 1.3 1.1 –12.7 Nebraska 27 17 –37.0 1.4 0.9 –37.3 North Dakota 13 18 38.5 1.7 2.4 37.7 South Dakota 12 16 33.3 1.4 1.8 32.4 Subtotal 381 358 –6.0 1.8 1.7 –6.4 Division 5: South Atlantic Delaware 22 19 –13.6 2.3 2.0 –14.4 District of Columbia 36 24 –33.3 5.1 3.4 –33.7 Florida 591 558 –5.6 2.8 2.6 –6.6 Georgia 271 301 11.1 2.6 2.8 10.0 Maryland 210 212 1.0 3.5 3.5 0.8 North Carolina 196 185 –5.6 1.9 1.8 –6.6 South Carolina 86 80 –7.0 1.7 1.6 –8.1 Virginia 205 190 –7.3 2.4 2.2 –7.7 West Virginia 6 10 66.7 0.3 0.6 67.8 Subtotal 1,623 1,579 –2.7 2.5 2.4 –3.5 Division 6: East South Central Alabama 91 87 –4.4 1.9 1.8 –4.7 Kentucky 65 66 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 Mississippi 81 58 –28.4 2.7 1.9 –28.3 Tennessee 139 128 –7.9 2.1 1.9 –8.7 Subtotal 376 339 –9.8 2.0 1.8 –10.2 Division 7: West South Central Arkansas 76 63 –17.1 2.5 2.1 –17.3 Louisiana 105 89 –15.2 2.3 1.9 –15.0 Oklahoma 74 72 –2.7 1.9 1.8 –3.1 Texas 1,124 1,153 2.6 3.9 4.0 1.3 Subtotal 1,379 1,377 –0.1 3.4 3.4 –1.1 Division 8: Mountain Arizona 178 184 3.4 2.5 2.5 1.7 Colorado 64 66 3.1 1.1 1.1 1.9 Idaho 15 7 –53.3 0.9 0.4 –54.3 Montana 5 2 –60.0 0.5 0.2 –60.3 Nevada 69 52 –24.6 2.3 1.7 –25.9 New Mexico 41 40 –2.4 2.0 1.9 –2.6 Utah 18 27 50.0 0.6 0.8 47.5 Wyoming 1 1 0.0 0.2 0.2 –0.2 Subtotal 391 379 –3.1 1.6 1.5 –4.4 Division 9: Pacific Alaska 63 59 –6.3 8.6 8.1 –5.9 California 2,097 2,118 1.0 5.3 5.4 0.9 Hawaii 120 99 –17.5 8.4 7.0 –17.2 Oregon 81 70 –13.6 1.9 1.7 –14.3 Washington 190 223 17.4 2.5 2.9 16.0 Subtotal 2,551 2,569 0.7 4.8 4.8 0.4 Total 9,021 8,920 –1.1 2.8 2.7 –1.6 * Based on data from the National Tuberculosis Surveillance System as of March 3, 2020. † Cases per 100,000 persons. Calculated using midyear population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau. § Calculated using unrounded figures. Among 8,920 TB cases reported during 2019, a total of 6,322 (70.9%) occurred among non–U.S.-born persons (Table 2). From 2018 to 2019, the rate among U.S.-born persons declined 4.2% (to 0.9 cases per 100,000 persons), while the rate among non–U.S.-born persons declined 1.5% (to 14.1) (Table 2) (Figure). TABLE 2 Tuberculosis (TB) case counts and rates, by national origin and race/ethnicity — United States, 2016–2019 U.S. population group No. of cases* (rate†) 2016 2017 2018 2019 U.S.-born§ persons Hispanic/Latino 593 (1.6) 582 (1.5) 589 (1.5) 628 (1.6) White 904 (0.5) 790 (0.4) 807 (0.4) 756 (0.4) Black/African American 1,057 (3.0) 999 (2.8) 950 (2.7) 905 (2.5) Asian 144 (2.1) 134 (1.9) 137 (1.9) 120 (1.6) American Indian/Alaska Native 110 (5.1) 91 (3.8) 102 (4.0) 79 (3.4) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 30 (4.1) 45 (6.5) 42 (5.6) 23 (3.5) Multiple or unknown race/ethnicity 22 (—¶) 28 (—¶) 31 (—¶) 42 (—¶) Subtotal 2,860 (1.0) 2,669 (1.0) 2,658 (1.0) 2,553 (0.9) Non–U.S.-born persons Hispanic/Latino 1,976 (10.0) 1,959 (9.9) 2,039 (10.3) 2,065 (10.2) White 281 (3.7) 266 (3.4) 261 (3.2) 250 (3.1) Black/African American 911 (22.7) 899 (22.2) 846 (20.3) 825 (19.5) Asian 3,055 (27.2) 3,128 (27.3) 3,069 (26.0) 3,000 (25.7) American Indian/Alaska Native 1 (2.9) 2 (2.9) 2 (3.5) 3 (5.3) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 46 (12.7) 67 (22.7) 72 (24.4) 81 (25.1) Multiple or unknown race/ethnicity 64 (—¶) 52 (—¶) 70 (—¶) 98 (—¶) Subtotal 6,334 (14.7) 6,373 (14.7) 6,359 (14.3) 6,322 (14.1) Unknown national origin 5 (—¶) 7 (—¶) 4 (—¶) 45 (—¶) Total 9,199 (2.8) 9,049 (2.8) 9,021 (2.8) 8,920 (2.7) * Based on data from the National Tuberculosis Surveillance System as of March 3, 2020. † Cases per 100,000 persons. Rates according to national origin and race/ethnicity were calculated using midyear population estimates from the Current Population Survey. Total rate was calculated using midyear population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau. § U.S.-born persons were those born in the United States or U.S. territories (American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, or U.S. Virgin Islands) or born elsewhere to a U.S. citizen. Non–U.S.-born persons were born outside the United States and U.S. territories, and include those born in the sovereign freely associated states (Federated States of Micronesia, Marshall Islands, or Palau) unless one or both parents were U.S. citizens. ¶ Rates could not be calculated for these categories because population estimates are not available. FIGURE Tuberculosis (TB) case counts and rates, by national origin* ,† — United States, 2007–2019 * Number of cases with unknown national origin not shown (range = 2–60 per year; median = 7). Total rate includes cases with unknown national origin. † Rates for non–U.S.-born and U.S.-born persons were calculated using Current Population Survey estimates. Total rate was calculated using U.S. Census Bureau population estimates. The figure is a histogram showing the number of TB cases and TB rates, by national origin, among persons in the United States during 2007–2019. Among non–U.S.-born persons residing in the United States, TB rates during 2019 were highest among Asians (25.7 per 100,000), followed by Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (25.1), blacks/African Americans (19.5), Hispanics/Latinos (10.2), and American Indians/Alaska Natives (5.3) and were lowest among whites (3.1) (Table 2). Rates decreased from 2018 to 2019 for all non–U.S.-born groups except American Indians/Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders. The top five countries of birth among non–U.S.-born persons with incident TB in 2019 were Mexico (1,165 cases; 18.4% of non–U.S.-born cases), the Philippines (790; 12.5%), India (573; 9.1%), Vietnam (503; 8.0%), and China (387; 6.1%). Among U.S.-born persons, 2019 rates were highest for Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (3.5), followed by American Indians/Alaska Natives (3.4), blacks/African Americans (2.5), Hispanics/Latinos (1.6), and Asians (1.6) and were lowest among whites (0.4). TB incidence decreased from 2018 to 2019 for all U.S.-born groups except Hispanics. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status was known for 87.3% of reported 2019 TB cases; 4.9% of those patients were coinfected with HIV, including 7.8% of persons aged 25–44 years. Initial drug-susceptibility testing results for at least isoniazid and rifampin were reported for 94.9% of culture-confirmed cases during 2018, the most recent year for which complete data are available.** Among the 6,746 cases during 2018 with available drug-susceptibility test data, 102 (1.5%) were multidrug-resistant †† ; 88 (86.3%) of these cases were among non–U.S.-born persons; 83 (81.4%) reported no previous TB episode. One case of extensively drug-resistant TB §§ was reported during 2018; this case occurred in a non–U.S.-born person with a reported previous episode of TB disease. Discussion Since adoption of the U.S. TB elimination strategy in 1989 ( 1 ), TB incidence has decreased by approximately two thirds ( 2 ), demonstrating the effectiveness of efforts during the last three decades to prevent TB transmission in the United States. However, the pace of progress has slowed since 2012 ( 3 ). This slowing is primarily related to the declining proportion of TB cases caused by recent transmission within the United States, against which the U.S. TB elimination strategy has been most effective ( 4 ). Currently, approximately 80% of TB cases result from reactivation of LTBI acquired years in the past, often outside the United States ( 2 ). This shift in U.S. TB epidemiology from being driven primarily by recent transmission within the United States to reactivation of LTBI acquired in the past (often outside the United States) requires an expanded strategy that increases emphasis on detecting and treating LTBI. However, this expanded focus on LTBI cannot compromise existing efforts to prevent TB transmission if the United States is to avoid another TB resurgence, as occurred in the late 1980s and early 1990s ( 5 ). The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and CDC recommend routine LTBI screening for populations at increased risk, including persons who have lived in countries with increased TB prevalence and persons who have resided in high-risk congregate settings (e.g., homeless shelters or correctional facilities) ( 6 ). The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of LTBI screening and treatment, when implemented in populations at risk, compare favorably with other widely accepted preventive care interventions, including mammography to screen for breast cancer ( 7 ) and use of statins to prevent cardiovascular disease ( 8 ). LTBI screening (and treatment as indicated) should therefore be considered a routine and integral part of primary care for patients at elevated risk for LTBI. The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, this analysis is based on provisional case counts for 2019; however, in previous years, final case counts and rates have not differed greatly from the provisional figures. Second, rates were calculated using estimated population denominators; as a result, rates might change slightly as population estimates are refined in the future. Third, incidence trends for some demographic groups with few patients, e.g., non–U.S.-born American Indian/Alaska Natives, should be interpreted cautiously because of the increased volatility in these rates. Finally, complete drug susceptibility test data are not available for 2019 because susceptibility testing might take several weeks to complete because of the slow-growing nature of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Concerns regarding the potential adverse effects of LTBI treatment have been an important barrier to LTBI screening and treatment in the past ( 9 ). To address these concerns, CDC and the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association have released new guidelines that recommend short-course, rifamycin-based regimens, which have less toxicity and better completion rates than does isoniazid monotherapy ( 10 ). CDC will continue to support and encourage public health partners and primary care providers to increase adoption of LTBI testing and treatment guidelines to accelerate progress toward TB elimination. Summary What is already known about this topic? Tuberculosis (TB) incidence in the United States has steadily declined since 1993, but the pace of decline has slowed in recent years. What is added by this report? The U.S. TB rate during 2019 declined to 2.7 cases per 100,000 persons, the lowest level on record. However, the annual pace of decline (−1.6% from 2018) remains slow, particularly among TB cases that are attributed to reactivation of latent TB infection (LTBI). What are the implications for public health practice? To eliminate TB, the United States needs to expand testing and treatment for LTBI while continuing to prevent TB transmission. Partnerships with health care providers, including private providers, are essential for this strategy’s success.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The cascade of care in diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

          WHO estimates that a third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis infection and that less than 5% of those infected are diagnosed and treated to prevent tuberculosis. We aimed to systematically review studies that report the steps from initial tuberculosis screening through to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection, which we call the latent tuberculosis cascade of care. We specifically aimed to assess the number of people lost at each stage of the cascade.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020

            Summary Comprehensive guidelines for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among persons living in the United States were last published in 2000 (American Thoracic Society. CDC targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S221–47). Since then, several new regimens have been evaluated in clinical trials. To update previous guidelines, the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NTCA) and CDC convened a committee to conduct a systematic literature review and make new recommendations for the most effective and least toxic regimens for treatment of LTBI among persons who live in the United States. The systematic literature review included clinical trials of regimens to treat LTBI. Quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) from clinical trial comparisons was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. In addition, a network meta-analysis evaluated regimens that had not been compared directly in clinical trials. The effectiveness outcome was tuberculosis disease; the toxicity outcome was hepatotoxicity. Strong GRADE recommendations required at least moderate evidence of effectiveness and that the desirable consequences outweighed the undesirable consequences in the majority of patients. Conditional GRADE recommendations were made when determination of whether desirable consequences outweighed undesirable consequences was uncertain (e.g., with low-quality evidence). These updated 2020 LTBI treatment guidelines include the NTCA- and CDC-recommended treatment regimens that comprise three preferred rifamycin-based regimens and two alternative monotherapy regimens with daily isoniazid. All recommended treatment regimens are intended for persons infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is presumed to be susceptible to isoniazid or rifampin. These updated guidelines do not apply when evidence is available that the infecting M. tuberculosis strain is resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin; recommendations for treating contacts exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis were published in 2019 (Nahid P, Mase SR Migliori GB, et al. Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. An official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:e93–e142). The three rifamycin-based preferred regimens are 3 months of once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine, 4 months of daily rifampin, or 3 months of daily isoniazid plus rifampin. Prescribing providers or pharmacists who are unfamiliar with rifampin and rifapentine might confuse the two drugs. They are not interchangeable, and caution should be taken to ensure that patients receive the correct medication for the intended regimen. Preference for these rifamycin-based regimens was made on the basis of effectiveness, safety, and high treatment completion rates. The two alternative treatment regimens are daily isoniazid for 6 or 9 months; isoniazid monotherapy is efficacious but has higher toxicity risk and lower treatment completion rates than shorter rifamycin-based regimens. In summary, short-course (3- to 4-month) rifamycin-based treatment regimens are preferred over longer-course (6–9 month) isoniazid monotherapy for treatment of LTBI. These updated guidelines can be used by clinicians, public health officials, policymakers, health care organizations, and other state and local stakeholders who might need to adapt them to fit individual clinical circumstances.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Statins for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

              Cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States, may be potentially preventable with statin therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                20 March 2020
                20 March 2020
                : 69
                : 11
                : 286-289
                Affiliations
                Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC; Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Noah G. Schwartz, nschwartz@ 123456cdc.gov , 404-718-3584.
                Article
                mm6911a3
                10.15585/mmwr.mm6911a3
                7739979
                32191684
                56a92871-4e26-4945-8214-e0604548b708

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article