0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “What is the actual goal of the pathway?”: examining emergency department physician and nurse perspectives on the implementation of a pediatric concussion pathway using the theoretical domains framework

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Multiple evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) exist to guide the management of concussion in children, but few have been translated into clinical pathways (CP), which operationalize guidelines into accessible and actionable algorithms that can be more readily implemented by health care providers. This study aimed to identify the clinical behaviours, attitudinal factors, and environmental contexts that potentially influence the implementation of a clinical pathway for pediatric concussion.

          Methods

          Semi-structured interviews were conducted from October 2017 to January 2018 with 42 emergency department clinicians (17 physicians, 25 nurses) at five urban emergency departments in Alberta, Canada. A Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)-informed interview guide contained open-ended questions intended to gather feedback on the proposed pathway developed for the study, as well as factors that could potentially influence its implementation.

          Results

          The original 14 domains of the TDF were collapsed into 6 clusters based on significant overlap between domains in the issues discussed by clinicians: 1) knowledge, skills, and practice; 2) professional roles and identity; 3) attitudes, beliefs, and motivations; 4) goals and priorities; 5) local context and resources; and 6) engagement and collaboration. The 6 clusters identified in the interviews each reflect 2–4 predominant topics that can be condensed into six overarching themes regarding clinicians’ views on the implementation of a concussion CP: 1) standardization in the midst of evolving research; 2) clarifying and communicating goals; 3) knowledge dissemination and alignment of information; 4) a team-oriented approach; 5) site engagement; and 6) streamlining clinical processes.

          Conclusion

          Application of a comprehensive, evidence-based, and theory-driven framework in conjunction with an inductive thematic analysis approach enabled six themes to emerge as to how to successfullly implement a concussion CP.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

          Background An integrative theoretical framework, developed for cross-disciplinary implementation and other behaviour change research, has been applied across a wide range of clinical situations. This study tests the validity of this framework. Methods Validity was investigated by behavioural experts sorting 112 unique theoretical constructs using closed and open sort tasks. The extent of replication was tested by Discriminant Content Validation and Fuzzy Cluster Analysis. Results There was good support for a refinement of the framework comprising 14 domains of theoretical constructs (average silhouette value 0.29): ‘Knowledge’, ‘Skills’, ‘Social/Professional Role and Identity’, ‘Beliefs about Capabilities’, ‘Optimism’, ‘Beliefs about Consequences’, ‘Reinforcement’, ‘Intentions’, ‘Goals’, ‘Memory, Attention and Decision Processes’, ‘Environmental Context and Resources’, ‘Social Influences’, ‘Emotions’, and ‘Behavioural Regulation’. Conclusions The refined Theoretical Domains Framework has a strengthened empirical base and provides a method for theoretically assessing implementation problems, as well as professional and other health-related behaviours as a basis for intervention development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach.

              Evidence-based guidelines are often not implemented effectively with the result that best health outcomes are not achieved. This may be due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the processes involved in changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals. This paper reports the development of a consensus on a theoretical framework that could be used in implementation research. The objectives were to identify an agreed set of key theoretical constructs for use in (1) studying the implementation of evidence based practice and (2) developing strategies for effective implementation, and to communicate these constructs to an interdisciplinary audience. Six phases of work were conducted to develop a consensus: (1) identifying theoretical constructs; (2) simplifying into construct domains; (3) evaluating the importance of the construct domains; (4) interdisciplinary evaluation; (5) validating the domain list; and (6) piloting interview questions. The contributors were a "psychological theory" group (n = 18), a "health services research" group (n = 13), and a "health psychology" group (n = 30). Twelve domains were identified to explain behaviour change: (1) knowledge, (2) skills, (3) social/professional role and identity, (4) beliefs about capabilities, (5) beliefs about consequences, (6) motivation and goals, (7) memory, attention and decision processes, (8) environmental context and resources, (9) social influences, (10) emotion regulation, (11) behavioural regulation, and (12) nature of the behaviour. A set of behaviour change domains agreed by a consensus of experts is available for use in implementation research. Applications of this domain list will enhance understanding of the behaviour change processes inherent in implementation of evidence-based practice and will also test the validity of these proposed domains.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lya@ucalgary.ca
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                5 February 2021
                5 February 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 119
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.22072.35, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7697, Department of Psychology, , University of Calgary, ; 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4 Canada
                [2 ]GRID grid.28046.38, ISNI 0000 0001 2182 2255, Department of Pediatrics, , University of Ottawa, ; 75 Laurier Avenue East, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5 Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Department of Pediatrics, , University of Alberta, ; 3-513 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R7 Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.22072.35, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7697, University of Calgary, School of Public Policy, ; 906 8th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 1H9 Canada
                [5 ]GRID grid.22072.35, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7697, University of Calgary, Faculty of Kinesiology, ; 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4 Canada
                [6 ]GRID grid.25073.33, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8227, Department of Pediatrics, , McMaster University, ; 1280 Main Street, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1 Canada
                [7 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Department of Pediatrics, , University of Alberta, ; 4-539 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R7 Canada
                [8 ]GRID grid.22072.35, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7697, Department of Pediatrics, , University of Calgary, ; 28 Oki Drive NW, Calgary, T3B 6A8 Canada
                [9 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Department of Pediatrics, , University of Alberta, ; 10230 111 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5G 0B7 Canada
                [10 ]GRID grid.1003.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, University of Queensland, Child Health Research Centre, ; Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
                [11 ]GRID grid.267455.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9596, Department of Psychology, , University of Windsor, ; 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4 Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7609-3819
                Article
                6110
                10.1186/s12913-021-06110-2
                7863464
                33546684
                5711bb98-f8a7-4588-ac2a-9c997f7cc80c
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 14 June 2019
                : 21 January 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007582, Alberta Health Services;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009408, Fondation Brain Canada;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Health & Social care
                pediatric concussion,clinical pathway,implementation,emergency care,theoretical domains framework,health outcomes,standardization

                Comments

                Comment on this article