0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Propensity score weighting for causal subgroup analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A common goal in comparative effectiveness research is to estimate treatment effects on prespecified subpopulations of patients. Though widely used in medical research, causal inference methods for such subgroup analysis (SGA) remain underdeveloped, particularly in observational studies. In this article, we develop a suite of analytical methods and visualization tools for causal SGA. First, we introduce the estimand of subgroup weighted average treatment effect and provide the corresponding propensity score weighting estimator. We show that balancing covariates within a subgroup bounds the bias of the estimator of subgroup causal effects. Second, we propose to use the overlap weighting (OW) method to achieve exact balance within subgroups. We further propose a method that combines OW and LASSO, to balance the bias‐variance tradeoff in SGA. Finally, we design a new diagnostic graph—the Connect‐S plot—for visualizing the subgroup covariate balance. Extensive simulation studies are presented to compare the proposed method with several existing methods. We apply the proposed methods to the patient‐centered results for uterine fibroids (COMPARE‐UF) registry data to evaluate alternative management options for uterine fibroids for relief of symptoms and quality of life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies

              The propensity score is defined as a subject's probability of treatment selection, conditional on observed baseline covariates. Weighting subjects by the inverse probability of treatment received creates a synthetic sample in which treatment assignment is independent of measured baseline covariates. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score allows one to obtain unbiased estimates of average treatment effects. However, these estimates are only valid if there are no residual systematic differences in observed baseline characteristics between treated and control subjects in the sample weighted by the estimated inverse probability of treatment. We report on a systematic literature review, in which we found that the use of IPTW has increased rapidly in recent years, but that in the most recent year, a majority of studies did not formally examine whether weighting balanced measured covariates between treatment groups. We then proceed to describe a suite of quantitative and qualitative methods that allow one to assess whether measured baseline covariates are balanced between treatment groups in the weighted sample. The quantitative methods use the weighted standardized difference to compare means, prevalences, higher‐order moments, and interactions. The qualitative methods employ graphical methods to compare the distribution of continuous baseline covariates between treated and control subjects in the weighted sample. Finally, we illustrate the application of these methods in an empirical case study. We propose a formal set of balance diagnostics that contribute towards an evolving concept of ‘best practice’ when using IPTW to estimate causal treatment effects using observational data. © 2015 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                laine.thomas@duke.edu
                Journal
                Stat Med
                Stat Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258
                SIM
                Statistics in Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0277-6715
                1097-0258
                12 May 2021
                30 August 2021
                : 40
                : 19 ( doiID: 10.1002/sim.v40.19 )
                : 4294-4309
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA
                [ 2 ] Berry Consultants Austin Texas USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Statistics University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
                [ 4 ] Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Statistical Science Duke University Durham North Carolina USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence Laine Thomas, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

                Email: laine.thomas@ 123456duke.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2895-532X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-2245
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0390-3673
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5340-8742
                Article
                SIM9029
                10.1002/sim.9029
                8360075
                33982316
                571fc933-b200-46f7-94c1-8dba4473b937
                © 2021 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 20 March 2021
                : 12 October 2020
                : 25 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 16, Words: 7733
                Funding
                Funded by: Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute , doi 10.13039/100006093;
                Award ID: ME‐2018C2‐13289
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                30 August 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.5 mode:remove_FC converted:12.08.2021

                Biostatistics
                balancing weights,causal inference,covariate balance,effect modification,interaction,overlap weights,propensity score,subgroup analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article