0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mapping mammography in Arkansas: Locating areas with poor spatial access to breast cancer screening using optimization models and geographic information systems

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3
      Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
      Cambridge University Press
      Breast cancer, mammography, screening, GIS, accessibility, rural health

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          Arkansans have some of the worst breast cancer mortality to incidence ratios in the United States (5th for Blacks, 4th for Whites, 7th overall). Screening mammography allows for early detection and significant reductions in mortality, yet not all women have access to these life-saving services. Utilization in Arkansas is well below the national average, and the number of FDA-approved screening facilities has decreased by 38% since 2001. Spatial accessibility plays an important role in whether women receive screenings.

          Methods:

          We use constrained optimization models within a geographic information system (GIS) to probabilistically allocate women to nearby screening facilities, accounting for facility capacity and patient travel time. We examine accessibility results by rurality derived from rural–urban commuting area (RUCA) codes.

          Results:

          Under most models, screening capacity is insufficient to meet theoretical demand given travel constraints. Approximately 80% of Arkansan women live within 30 minutes of a screening facility, most of which are located in urban and suburban areas. The majority of unallocated demand was in Small towns and Rural areas.

          Conclusions:

          Geographic disparities in screening mammography accessibility exist across Arkansas, but women living in Rural areas have particularly poor spatial access. Mobile mammography clinics can remove patient travel time constraints to help meet rural demand. More broadly, optimization models and GIS can be applied to many studies of healthcare accessibility in rural populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state

          In this article, the American Cancer Society provides an overview of female breast cancer statistics in the United States, including data on incidence, mortality, survival, and screening. Approximately 252,710 new cases of invasive breast cancer and 40,610 breast cancer deaths are expected to occur among US women in 2017. From 2005 to 2014, overall breast cancer incidence rates increased among Asian/Pacific Islander (1.7% per year), non-Hispanic black (NHB) (0.4% per year), and Hispanic (0.3% per year) women but were stable in non-Hispanic white (NHW) and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The increasing trends were driven by increases in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, which increased among all racial/ethnic groups, whereas rates of hormone receptor-negative breast cancers decreased. From 1989 to 2015, breast cancer death rates decreased by 39%, which translates to 322,600 averted breast cancer deaths in the United States. During 2006 to 2015, death rates decreased in all racial/ethnic groups, including AI/ANs. However, NHB women continued to have higher breast cancer death rates than NHW women, with rates 39% higher (mortality rate ratio [MRR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.43) in NHB women in 2015, although the disparity has ceased to widen since 2011. By state, excess death rates in black women ranged from 20% in Nevada (MRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.42) to 66% in Louisiana (MRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.54, 1.79). Notably, breast cancer death rates were not significantly different in NHB and NHW women in 7 states, perhaps reflecting an elimination of disparities and/or a lack of statistical power. Improving access to care for all populations could eliminate the racial disparity in breast cancer mortality and accelerate the reduction in deaths from this malignancy nationwide. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:439-448. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction.

            Access is an important concept in health policy and health services research, yet it is one which has not been defined or employed precisely. To some authors "access" refers to entry into or use of the health care system, while to others it characterizes factors influencing entry or use. The purpose of this article is to propose a taxonomic definition of "access." Access is presented here as a general concept that summarizes a set of more specific dimensions describing the fit between the patient and the health care system. The specific dimensions are availability, accessibility, accommodation, affordability and acceptability. Using interview data on patient satisfaction, the discriminant validity of these dimensions is investigated. Results provide strong support for the view that differentiation does exist among the five areas and that the measures do relate to the phenomena with which they are identified.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges

              Primary care is recognized as the most important form of healthcare for maintaining population health because it is relatively inexpensive, can be more easily delivered than specialty and inpatient care, and if properly distributed it is most effective in preventing disease progression on a large scale. Recent advances in the field of health geography have greatly improved our understanding of the role played by geographic distribution of health services in population health maintenance. However, most of this knowledge has accrued for hospital and specialty services and services in rural areas. Much less is known about the effect of distance to and supply of primary care on primary care utilization, particularly in the U.S. For several reasons the shortage of information is particularly acute for urban areas, where the majority of people live. First, explicit definitions and conceptualizations of healthcare access have not been widely used to guide research. An additional barrier to progress has been an overwhelming concern about affordability of care, which has garnered the majority of attention and research resources. Also, the most popular measures of spatial accessibility to care – travel impedance to nearest provider and supply level within bordered areas – lose validity in congested urban areas. Better measures are needed. Fortunately, some advances are occurring on the methodological front. These can improve our knowledge of all types of healthcare geography in all settings, including primary care in urban areas. This paper explains basic concepts and measurements of access, provides some historical background, outlines the major questions concerning geographic accessibility of primary care, describes recent developments in GIS and spatial analysis, and presents examples of promising work.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Transl Sci
                J Clin Transl Sci
                CTS
                Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                2059-8661
                October 2020
                24 March 2020
                : 4
                : 5
                : 437-442
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR, USA
                [2 ]Department of Epidemiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR, USA
                [3 ]Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR, USA
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: S. G. Young, PhD, 4301 W. Markham St. #820, Little Rock, AR, USA. Tel.: +1 501 526 6606. Email: SGYoung@ 123456uams.edu
                [†]

                Current address: Allergy and Immunology Division, Arkansas Children’s Research Institute, Little Rock, AR, USA.

                [‡]

                Current address: Associated Radiologists, LTD, St. Bernards Healthcare System, Jonesboro, AR, USA.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0054-0627
                Article
                S205986612000028X
                10.1017/cts.2020.28
                7681135
                33244433
                57209ffa-57e6-4cc6-b99b-489db9073898
                © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 November 2019
                : 26 February 2020
                : 13 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 37, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Methods and Technology

                breast cancer,mammography,screening,gis,accessibility,rural health

                Comments

                Comment on this article