0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stickler Syndrome: Airway Complications in a Case Series of 502 Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Patients with Stickler syndrome often require emergency surgery and are often anesthetized in nonspecialist units, typically for retinal detachment repair. Despite the occurrence of cleft palate and Pierre-Robin sequence, there is little published literature on airway complications. Our aim was to describe anesthetic practice and complications in a nonselected series of Stickler syndrome cases. To our knowledge, this is the largest such series in the published literature.

          METHODS:

          We retrospectively identified patients with genetically confirmed Stickler syndrome who had undergone general anesthesia in a major teaching hospital, seeking to identify factors that predicted patients who would require more than 1 attempt to correctly site an endotracheal tube (ETT) or supraglottic airway device (SAD). Patient demographics, associated factors, and anesthetic complications were collected. Descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression modeling were performed.

          RESULTS:

          Five hundred and two

          anesthetic events were analyzed. Three hundred ninety-five (92.7%) type 1 Stickler and 63 (96.9%) type 2 Stickler patients could be managed with a single attempt of passing an ETT or SAD. Advanced airway techniques were required on 4 occasions, and we report no major complications. On logistic regression, modeling receding mandible ( P = .0004) and history of cleft palate ( P = .0004) were significantly associated with the need for more than 1 attempt at airway manipulation.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          The majority of Stickler patients can be anesthetized safely with standard management. If patients have a receding mandible or history of cleft, an experienced anesthetist familiar with Stickler syndrome should manage the patient. We recommend that patients identified to have a difficult airway wear an alert bracelet.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation.

          Tracheal extubation is a high-risk phase of anaesthesia. The majority of problems that occur during extubation and emergence are of a minor nature, but a small and significant number may result in injury or death. The need for a strategy incorporating extubation is mentioned in several international airway management guidelines, but the subject is not discussed in detail, and the emphasis has been on extubation of the patient with a difficult airway. The Difficult Airway Society has developed guidelines for the safe management of tracheal extubation in adult peri-operative practice. The guidelines discuss the problems arising during extubation and recovery and promote a strategic, stepwise approach to extubation. They emphasise the importance of planning and preparation, and include practical techniques for use in clinical practice and recommendations for post-extubation care. Anaesthesia © 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments.

            The Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society (NAP4) was designed to identify and study serious airway complications occurring during anaesthesia, in intensive care unit (ICU) and the emergency department (ED). Reports of major complications of airway management (death, brain damage, emergency surgical airway, unanticipated ICU admission, prolonged ICU stay) were collected from all National Health Service hospitals over a period of 1 yr. An expert panel reviewed inclusion criteria, outcome, and airway management. A total of 184 events met inclusion criteria: 36 in ICU and 15 in the ED. In ICU, 61% of events led to death or persistent neurological injury, and 31% in the ED. Airway events in ICU and the ED were more likely than those during anaesthesia to occur out-of-hours, be managed by doctors with less anaesthetic experience and lead to permanent harm. Failure to use capnography contributed to 74% of cases of death or persistent neurological injury. At least one in four major airway events in a hospital are likely to occur in ICU or the ED. The outcome of these events is particularly adverse. Analysis of the cases has identified repeated gaps in care that include: poor identification of at-risk patients, poor or incomplete planning, inadequate provision of skilled staff and equipment to manage these events successfully, delayed recognition of events, and failed rescue due to lack of or failure of interpretation of capnography. The project findings suggest avoidable deaths due to airway complications occur in ICU and the ED.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists' prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: a cohort study of 188 064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database.

              Both the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the UK NAP4 project recommend that an unspecified pre-operative airway assessment be made. However, the choice of assessment is ultimately at the discretion of the individual anaesthesiologist. We retrieved a cohort of 188 064 cases from the Danish Anaesthesia Database, and investigated the diagnostic accuracy of the anaesthesiologists' predictions of difficult tracheal intubation and difficult mask ventilation. Of 3391 difficult intubations, 3154 (93%) were unanticipated. When difficult intubation was anticipated, 229 of 929 (25%) had an actual difficult intubation. Likewise, difficult mask ventilation was unanticipated in 808 of 857 (94%) cases, and when anticipated (218 cases), difficult mask ventilation actually occurred in 49 (22%) cases. We present a previously unpublished estimate of the accuracy of anaesthesiologists' prediction of airway management difficulties in daily routine practice. Prediction of airway difficulties remains a challenging task, and our results underline the importance of being constantly prepared for unexpected difficulties.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Anesth Analg
                Anesth Analg
                ANE
                Anesthesia and Analgesia
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkin (Hagerstown, MD )
                0003-2999
                1526-7598
                16 December 2019
                January 2021
                : 132
                : 1
                : 202-209
                Affiliations
                From the [* ]Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                []University Division of Anesthesia, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                []Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [§ ]Department of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal Service, BOX 41, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                []Department of Ophthalmology, Stickler Syndrome Diagnostic Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                []Division of Emergency and Perioperative Care, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Martin P. Snead, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Stickler Syndrome Diagnostic Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom. Address email to mps34@ 123456cam.ac.uk .
                Article
                00028
                10.1213/ANE.0000000000004582
                7717475
                31856005
                573751b7-5125-4c87-93b3-e3d3752f2d34
                Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Anesthesia Research Society.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 November 2019
                Categories
                Original Research Articles
                Original Clinical Research Report
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                Comments

                Comment on this article