9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound‐Guided Iliohypogastric/Ilioinguinal Nerve Block Combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Retrospective Cohort Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks (LFCNB) and iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve blocks (IHINB) on postoperative pain and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA).

          Methods

          In this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing THA via the DAA between January 2019 and November 2019 were stratified into two groups based on their date of admission. Sixty‐seven patients received LFCNB and IHINB along with periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) (nerve block group), and 75 patients received PIA alone (control group). The outcomes included postoperative morphine consumption, postoperative pain assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the QoR‐15 score, and functional recovery measured as quadriceps strength, time to first straight leg rise, daily ambulation distance, and duration of hospitalization. The Oxford hip score and the UCLA activity level rating were assessed at 1 and 3 months after surgery. In addition, postoperative complications were recorded. Patients were also compared based on the type of incision used during surgery (traditional longitudinal or “bikini” incision).

          Results

          Patients in the nerve block group showed significantly lower postoperative morphine consumption, lower resting VAS scores within 12 h postoperatively, lower VAS scores during motion within 24 h postoperatively, and better QoR‐15 scores on postoperative day 1. These patients also showed significantly better functional recovery during hospitalization. At 1‐month and 3‐month outpatient follow up, the two groups showed no significant differences in Oxford hip score or UCLA activity level rating. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications. Similar results were observed when patients were stratified by type of incision, except that the duration of hospitalization was similar.

          Conclusion

          Compared to PIA alone, a combination of LFCNB and IHINB along with PIA can improve early pain relief, reduce morphine consumption, and accelerate functional recovery, without increasing complications after THA via the DAA.

          Abstract

          The location of the iliohypogastric nerve (IHN), the ilioinguinal nerve (IIN), and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) (A). Schematic diagram of the location of the nerve block (B). The upper block is the iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block (IHINB) and the lower block is the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCNB). The blue box shows the position of the ultrasonic transducer and the symbol x shows the needle insertion point. ASIS, anterior superior iliac spine. Schematic diagram of the IHINB (A). The high‐frequency linear‐array ultrasonic transducer was placed perpendicular to the inguinal ligament, with the lower end of the transducer at the ASIS and the upper end facing the umbilicus. The needle was inserted under the transducer from lateral to medial side in‐plane. Schematic diagram of the LFCNB (B). The transducer was placed on the inguinal ligament, with the upper end above the ASIS and the lower end pointing to the pubic symphysis. Then the transducer was moved along the inguinal ligament slowly inward and downward until the LFCN was detected. The needle was inserted from lateral to medial side in‐plane.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.

            Quality of recovery (QoR) after anesthesia is an important measure of the early postoperative health status of patients. The aim was to develop a short-form postoperative QoR score, and test its validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical acceptability and feasibility. Based on extensive clinical and research experience with the 40-item QoR-40, the strongest psychometrically performing items from each of the five dimensions of the QoR-40 were selected to create a short-form version, the QoR-15. This was then evaluated in 127 adult patients after general anesthesia and surgery. There was good convergent validity between the QoR-15 and a global QoR visual analog scale (r = 0.68, P < 0.0005). Construct validity was supported by a negative correlation with duration of surgery (r = -0.49, P < 0.0005), time spent in the postanesthesia care unit (r = -0.41, P < 0.0005), and duration of hospital stay (r = -0.53, P < 0.0005). There was also excellent internal consistency (0.85), split-half reliability (0.78), and test-retest reliability (ri = 0.99), all P < 0.0005. Responsiveness was excellent with an effect size of 1.35 and a standardized response mean of 1.04. The mean ± SD time to complete the QoR-15 was 2.4 ± 0.8 min. The QoR-15 provides a valid, extensive, and yet efficient evaluation of postoperative QoR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

              Outcome evaluations of lower extremity joint reconstructions should include an assessment of patient activity. In vivo wear assessments of total joint prostheses should be based on a measure of use, not time in situ or a proxy such as age or gender; however, clinicians lack a simple method to reliably assess the activity of patients with joint replacement. The modern pedometer can be a satisfactory means of quantifying the use of lower extremity joints. The pedometer, however, requires special effort on the part of the physician or evaluator and the patient. Therefore, we compared the quantitative assessment of walking activity of 100 total joint replacement patients, as measured with a pedometer, to the UCLA activity score and a simple visual analog scale that can easily be employed during a routine office evaluation. Both the UCLA activity rating (P = .002) and the visual analog scale rating of the investigator (P = .00001) had a strong correlation with the average steps per day as recorded by the pedometer. There was, however, up to a 15-fold difference in the average steps per day for individual patients with the same UCLA score. The visual analog scale as rated by the patients of their own activity did not have as strong a correlation with the pedometer data (P = .08) as did patient age (P = .049). For practical reasons, the pedometer is probably best reserved for the evaluation of extreme cases of activity (or inactivity). This study indicates that both the UCLA activity rating and the investigator visual analog scale are valid for routine activity assessment in a clinical setting. Adjustments of the UCLA activity score for the frequency and intensity of activity, as can be done with the investigator visual analog scale, increase the accuracy of the activity rating.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kangpengd@163.com
                Journal
                Orthop Surg
                Orthop Surg
                10.1111/(ISSN)1757-7861
                OS
                Orthopaedic Surgery
                John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd (Melbourne )
                1757-7853
                1757-7861
                31 March 2021
                May 2021
                : 13
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/os.v13.3 )
                : 920-931
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu China
                [ 2 ] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Karamay Municipal People's Hospital Karamay China
                [ 3 ] Department of General Surgery Yongchuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Yongchuan China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address for correspondence Pengde Kang, PhD, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China 610041 Tel: +862885422426; Fax: +86 28 85423438; Email: kangpengd@ 123456163.com

                [†]

                These two authors contributed equally to this work and should be regarded as first co‐authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3710-0796
                Article
                OS12795
                10.1111/os.12795
                8126898
                33788407
                57bcc44b-027e-4867-998d-19eb8be7e713
                © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 07 July 2020
                : 26 May 2020
                : 04 August 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 3, Pages: 12, Words: 7240
                Funding
                Funded by: Sichuan University West China Hospital
                Award ID: 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence
                Categories
                Clinical Article
                Clinical Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:17.05.2021

                direct anterior approach,enhanced recovery,pain,peripheral nerve blocks,total hip arthroplasty

                Comments

                Comment on this article