53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls. A prospective study.

      1 , , ,
      JAMA

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Falls are a major threat to the health of older persons. We evaluated potential risk factors for falls in 325 community-dwelling persons aged 60 years or older who had fallen during the previous year, then followed up weekly for 1 year to ascertain nonsyncopal falls and their consequences. Risk factors for having a single fall were few and relatively weak, but multiple falls were more predictable. In multivariate analyses, we found increased odds of two or more falls for persons who had difficulty standing up from a chair, difficulty performing a tandem walk, arthritis, Parkinson's disease, three or more falls during the previous year, and a fall with injury during the previous year, and for whites. The proportion of subjects with two or more falls per year increased from 0.10 for those with none or one of these risk factors to 0.69 for those with four or more risk factors. Among older persons with a history of a recent fall, the risk of multiple nonsyncopal falls can be predicted from a few simple questions and examinations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          JAMA
          JAMA
          0098-7484
          0098-7484
          May 12 1989
          : 261
          : 18
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Clinical Epidemiology Program, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
          Article
          10.1001/jama.1989.03420180087036
          2709546
          57c4c4e4-d55d-4a63-a6b0-38ea334e4e8c
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article