2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of medically generated electromagnetic interference from medical devices on cardiac implantable electronic devices: A review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) become more prevalent, it is important to acknowledge potential electromagnetic interference (EMI) from other sources, such as internal and external electronic devices and procedures and its effect on these devices. EMI from other sources can potentially inhibit pacing and trigger shocks in permanent pacemakers (PPM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), respectively. This review analyzes potential EMI amongst CIED and left ventricular assist device, deep brain stimulators, spinal cord stimulators, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators, and throughout an array of procedures, such as endoscopy, bronchoscopy, and procedures involving electrocautery. Although there is evidence to support EMI from internal and external devices and during procedures, there is a lack of large multicenter studies, and, as a result, current management guidelines are based primarily on expert opinion and anecdotal experience. We aim to provide a general overview of PPM/ICD function, review documented EMI effect on these devices, and acknowledge current management of CIED interference.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          16-year trends in the infection burden for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the United States 1993 to 2008.

          We analyzed the infection burden associated with the implantation of cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices (CIEDs) in the United States for the years 1993 to 2008. Recent data suggest that the rate of infection following CIED implantation may be increasing. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) discharge records were queried between 1993 and 2008 using the 9th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM). CIED infection was defined as either: 1) ICD-9 code for device-related infection (996.61) and any CIED procedure or removal code; or 2) CIED procedure code along with systemic infection. Patient health profile was evaluated by coding for renal failure, heart failure, respiratory failure, and diabetes mellitus. The infection burden and patient health profile were calculated for each year, and linear regression was used to test for changes over time. During the study period (1993 to 2008), the incidence of CIED infection was 1.61%. The annual rate of infections remained constant until 2004, when a marked increase was observed, which coincided with an increase in the incidence of major comorbidities. This was associated with a marked increase in mortality and in-hospital financial charges. The infection burden associated with CIED implantation is increasing over time and is associated with prolonged hospital stays and high financial costs. Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ACCF/HRS/AHA/ASE/HFSA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2013 appropriate use criteria for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, Heart Rhythm Society, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Failure Society of America, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Cardiol
                WJC
                World Journal of Cardiology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1949-8462
                26 August 2022
                26 August 2022
                : 14
                : 8
                : 446-453
                Affiliations
                Department of Cardiology, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30912, United States. wabarmore@ 123456augusta.edu
                Department of Internal Medicine, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30912, United States
                Department of Internal Medicine, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30912, United States
                Medical College of Georgia, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, United States
                Department of Cardiology, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA 30912, United States
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Barmore W, Patel H, Voong C, and Tarallo C contributed equally to this work; Barmore W and Patel H designed the review article; Barmore W, Patel H, Voong C, and Tarallo C performed the research; Barmore W, Patel H, Voong C, Tarallo C, and Calkins Jr JB wrote the manuscript; all authors have read and approve the final manuscript.

                Supported by the Gordon Chason Miller MD Cardiology Education Endowment Fund in the Medical College of Georgia Foundation.

                Corresponding author: Walker Barmore, MD, Doctor, Department of Cardiology, Augusta University Medical Center, 1120 15 th Street, Augusta, GA 30912, United States. wabarmore@ 123456augusta.edu

                Article
                jWJC.v14.i8.pg446
                10.4330/wjc.v14.i8.446
                9453256
                57c5b70c-110d-49a0-a073-b4021908f90d
                ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                -Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 26 April 2022
                : 15 June 2022
                : 15 August 2022
                Categories
                Minireviews

                electromagnetic interference,pacemaker,implantable cardioverter defibrillator,permanent pacemakers,cardiac implantable electronic devices,left ventricular assist device,endoscopy,bronchoscopy,electrocautery,capsule endoscopy,transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators unit,spinal cord stimulator

                Comments

                Comment on this article