1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maximising comfort: how do patients describe the care that matters? A two-stage qualitative descriptive study to develop a quality improvement framework for comfort-related care in inpatient settings

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To develop a multidimensional framework representing patients’ perspectives on comfort to guide practice and quality initiatives aimed at improving patients’ experiences of care.

          Design

          Two-stage qualitative descriptive study design. Findings from a previously published synthesis of 62 studies (stage 1) informed data collection and analysis of 25 semistructured interviews (stage 2) exploring patients’ perspectives of comfort in an acute care setting.

          Setting

          Cardiac surgical unit in New Zealand.

          Participants

          Culturally diverse patients in hospital undergoing heart surgery.

          Main outcomes

          A definition of comfort. The Comfort ALways Matters (CALM) framework describing factors influencing comfort.

          Results

          Comfort is transient and multidimensional and, as defined by patients, incorporates more than the absence of pain. Factors influencing comfort were synthesised into 10 themes within four inter-related layers: patients’ personal (often private) strategies; the unique role of family; staff actions and behaviours; and factors within the clinical environment.

          Conclusions

          These findings provide new insights into what comfort means to patients, the care required to promote their comfort and the reasons for which doing so is important. We have developed a definition of comfort and the CALM framework, which can be used by healthcare leaders and clinicians to guide practice and quality initiatives aimed at maximising comfort and minimising distress. These findings appear applicable to a range of inpatient populations. A focus on comfort by individuals is crucial, but leadership will be essential for driving the changes needed to reduce unwarranted variability in care that affects comfort.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          "Data were saturated . . . ".

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient dignity in an acute hospital setting: a case study.

            Nurses have a professional duty to respect patients' dignity. There is a dearth of research about patients' dignity in acute hospital settings. The study investigated the meaning of patient dignity, threats to patients' dignity, and how patient dignity can be promoted, in acute hospital settings. A qualitative, triangulated single case study design (one acute hospital), with embedded cases (one ward and its staff, and 24 patients). The study was based on a 22-bedded surgical ward in an acute hospital in England. Twenty-four patients, aged 34-92 years were purposively selected. There were 15 men and 9 women of varied socio-economic backgrounds. They could all communicate verbally and speak English. Twelve patients, who had stayed in the ward at least 2 days, were interviewed following discharge. The other 12 patients were observed and interviewed on the ward. The ward-based staff (26 registered nurses and healthcare assistants) were observed in practice. 13 were interviewed following observation. Six senior nurses were purposively selected for interviews. The data were collected during 2005. The Local Research Ethics Committee gave approval. Unstructured interviews using topic guides were conducted with the 24 patients, 13 ward-based staff and 6 senior nurses. Twelve 4-h episodes of participant observation were conducted. The data were analysed thematically using the framework approach. Patient dignity comprised feelings (feeling comfortable, in control and valued), physical presentation and behaviour. The environment, staff behaviour and patient factors impacted on patient dignity. Lack of environmental privacy threatened dignity. A conducive physical environment, dignity-promoting culture and other patients' support promoted dignity. Staff being curt, authoritarian and breaching privacy threatened dignity. Staff promoted dignity by providing privacy and interactions which made patients feel comfortable, in control and valued. Patients' impaired health and older age rendered them vulnerable to a loss of dignity. Patients promoted their own dignity through their attitudes (rationalisation, use of humour, acceptance), developing relationships with staff and retaining ability and control. Patients are vulnerable to loss of dignity in hospital. Staff behaviour and the hospital environment can influence whether patients' dignity is lost or upheld.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Patient satisfaction with hospital care and nurses in England: an observational study

              Objectives To inform healthcare workforce policy decisions by showing how patient perceptions of hospital care are associated with confidence in nurses and doctors, nurse staffing levels and hospital work environments. Design Cross-sectional surveys of 66 348 hospital patients and 2963 inpatient nurses. Setting Patients surveyed were discharged in 2010 from 161 National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England. Inpatient nurses were surveyed in 2010 in a sample of 46 hospitals in 31 of the same 161 trusts. Participants The 2010 NHS Survey of Inpatients obtained information from 50% of all patients discharged between June and August. The 2010 RN4CAST England Nurse Survey gathered information from inpatient medical and surgical nurses. Main outcome measures Patient ratings of their hospital care, their confidence in nurses and doctors and other indicators of their satisfaction. Missed nursing care was treated as both an outcome measure and explanatory factor. Results Patients’ perceptions of care are significantly eroded by lack of confidence in either nurses or doctors, and by increases in missed nursing care. The average number of types of missed care was negatively related to six of the eight outcomes—ORs ranged from 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.90) for excellent care ratings to 0.86 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.95) for medications completely explained—positively associated with higher patient-to-nurse ratios (b=0.15, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.19), and negatively associated with better work environments (b=−0.26, 95% CI −0.48 to −0.04). Conclusions Patients’ perceptions of hospital care are strongly associated with missed nursing care, which in turn is related to poor professional nurse (RN) staffing and poor hospital work environments. Improving RN staffing in NHS hospitals holds promise for enhancing patient satisfaction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                18 May 2020
                : 10
                : 5
                : e033336
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences , The University of Auckland , Auckland, New Zealand
                [2 ]departmentCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research – Epworth HealthCare Partnership, School of Nursing and Midwifery , Deakin University , Burwood, Victoria, Australia
                [3 ]departmentFaculty of Medical & Health Sciences , The University of Auckland , Auckland, New Zealand
                [4 ]Auckland City Hospital , Auckland, New Zealand
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Cynthia Wensley; c.wensley@ 123456auckland.ac.nz
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-7514
                Article
                bmjopen-2019-033336
                10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033336
                7239554
                32430447
                5838ecb8-407e-42f0-8c90-f084d7f8201f
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 31 July 2019
                : 17 February 2020
                : 24 February 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Postgraduate Award and a Deakin University Postgraduate Research Scholarship;
                Award ID: None Provided
                Categories
                Qualitative Research
                1506
                1725
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                comfort,patient experience,quality in health care,qualitative research,person and family centred care,compassion

                Comments

                Comment on this article