6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Developing a framework for investigating citizen science through a combination of web analytics and social science methods—The CS Track perspective

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over the past decade, Citizen Science (CS) has shown great potential to transform the power of the crowd into knowledge of societal value. Many projects and initiatives have produced high quality scientific results by mobilizing peoples' interest in science to volunteer for the public good. Few studies have attempted to map citizen science as a field, and assess its impact on science, society and ways to sustain its future practice. To better understand CS activities and characteristics, CS Track employs an analytics and analysis framework for monitoring the citizen science landscape. Within this framework, CS Track collates and processes information from project websites, platforms and social media and generates insights on key issues of concern to the CS community, such as participation patterns or impact on science learning. In this paper, we present the operationalization of the CS Track framework and its three-level analysis approach (micro-meso-macro) for applying analytics techniques to external data sources. We present three case studies investigating the CS landscape using these analytical levels and discuss the strengths and limitations of combining web-analytics with quantitative and qualitative research methods. This framework aims to complement existing methods for evaluating CS, address gaps in current observations of the citizen science landscape and integrate findings from multiple studies and methodologies. Through this work, CS Track intends to contribute to the creation of a measurement and evaluation scheme for CS and improve our understanding about the potential of analytics for the evaluation of CS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

          We introduce a new language representation model called BERT, which stands for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers. Unlike recent language representation models, BERT is designed to pre-train deep bidirectional representations from unlabeled text by jointly conditioning on both left and right context in all layers. As a result, the pre-trained BERT model can be fine-tuned with just one additional output layer to create state-of-the-art models for a wide range of tasks, such as question answering and language inference, without substantial task-specific architecture modifications. BERT is conceptually simple and empirically powerful. It obtains new state-of-the-art results on eleven natural language processing tasks, including pushing the GLUE score to 80.5% (7.7% point absolute improvement), MultiNLI accuracy to 86.7% (4.6% absolute improvement), SQuAD v1.1 question answering Test F1 to 93.2 (1.5 point absolute improvement) and SQuAD v2.0 Test F1 to 83.1 (5.1 point absolute improvement).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              What Is Citizen Science? – A Scientometric Meta-Analysis

              Context The concept of citizen science (CS) is currently referred to by many actors inside and outside science and research. Several descriptions of this purportedly new approach of science are often heard in connection with large datasets and the possibilities of mobilizing crowds outside science to assists with observations and classifications. However, other accounts refer to CS as a way of democratizing science, aiding concerned communities in creating data to influence policy and as a way of promoting political decision processes involving environment and health. Objective In this study we analyse two datasets (N = 1935, N = 633) retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) with the aim of giving a scientometric description of what the concept of CS entails. We account for its development over time, and what strands of research that has adopted CS and give an assessment of what scientific output has been achieved in CS-related projects. To attain this, scientometric methods have been combined with qualitative approaches to render more precise search terms. Results Results indicate that there are three main focal points of CS. The largest is composed of research on biology, conservation and ecology, and utilizes CS mainly as a methodology of collecting and classifying data. A second strand of research has emerged through geographic information research, where citizens participate in the collection of geographic data. Thirdly, there is a line of research relating to the social sciences and epidemiology, which studies and facilitates public participation in relation to environmental issues and health. In terms of scientific output, the largest body of articles are to be found in biology and conservation research. In absolute numbers, the amount of publications generated by CS is low (N = 1935), but over the past decade a new and very productive line of CS based on digital platforms has emerged for the collection and classification of data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Res Metr Anal
                Front Res Metr Anal
                Front. Res. Metr. Anal.
                Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2504-0537
                05 October 2022
                2022
                : 7
                : 988544
                Affiliations
                [1] 1MOFET Institute - Research Center , Tel-Aviv, Israel
                [2] 2The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv, Israel
                [3] 3Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Informática , Madrid, Spain
                [4] 4RIAS - Rhein-Ruhr-Institut für angewandte Systeminnovation e.V. , Duisburg, Germany
                [5] 5ATiT , Leuven, Belgium
                Author notes

                Edited by: Gabriella Punziano, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

                Reviewed by: Noemi Crescentini, University of Naples Federico II, Italy; Carson Leung, University of Manitoba, Canada

                *Correspondence: Reuma De-Groot reuma.de-groot@ 123456mail.huji.ac.il

                This article was submitted to Research Methods, a section of the journal Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics

                Article
                10.3389/frma.2022.988544
                9581138
                5876e01e-e60f-491d-abf6-f014942b0592
                Copyright © 2022 De-Groot, Golumbic, Martínez Martínez, Hoppe and Reynolds.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 07 July 2022
                : 17 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 27, Pages: 7, Words: 4655
                Categories
                Research Metrics and Analytics
                Perspective

                web-based analytics,social science analysis,citizen science,social networks analysis,content analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article