31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prostate Cancer and Neuroendocrine Differentiation: More Neuronal, Less Endocrine?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) marks a structural and functional feature of certain cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa), whereby the malignant tissue contains a significant proportion of cells displaying neuronal, endocrine, or mixed features. NED cells produce, and can secrete, a cocktail of mediators commonly encountered in the nervous system, which may stimulate and coordinate cancer growth. In PCa, NED appears during advanced stages, subsequent to treatment, and accompanies treatment resistance and poor prognosis. However, the term “neuroendocrine” in this context is intrinsically vague. This article seeks to provide a framework on which a unified view of NED might emerge. First, we review the mutually beneficial interplay between PCa and neural structures, mainly supported by cell biology experiments and neurological conditions. Next, we address the correlations between PCa and neural functions, as described in the literature. Based upon the integration of clinical and basic observations, we suggest that it is legitimate to seek for true neural differentiation, or neuromimicry, in cancer progression, most notably in PCa cells exhibiting what is commonly described as NED.

          Related collections

          Most cited references179

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis?

            Regional anesthesia is known to prevent or attenuate the surgical stress response; therefore, inhibiting surgical stress by paravertebral anesthesia might attenuate perioperative factors that enhance tumor growth and spread. The authors hypothesized that breast cancer patients undergoing surgery with paravertebral anesthesia and analgesia combined with general anesthesia have a lower incidence of cancer recurrence or metastases than patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia and patient-controlled morphine analgesia. In this retrospective study, the authors examined the medical records of 129 consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy and axillary clearance for breast cancer between September 2001 and December 2002. Fifty patients had surgery with paravertebral anesthesia and analgesia combined with general anesthesia, and 79 patients had general anesthesia combined with postoperative morphine analgesia. The follow-up time was 32 +/- 5 months (mean +/- SD). There were no significant differences in patients or surgical details, tumor presentation, or prognostic factors. Recurrence- and metastasis-free survival was 94% (95% confidence interval, 87-100%) and 82% (74-91%) at 24 months and 94% (87-100%) and 77% (68-87%) at 36 months in the paravertebral and general anesthesia patients, respectively (P = 0.012). This retrospective analysis suggests that paravertebral anesthesia and analgesia for breast cancer surgery reduces the risk of recurrence or metastasis during the initial years of follow-up. Prospective trials evaluating the effects of regional analgesia and morphine sparing on cancer recurrence seem warranted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Identification of drugs including a dopamine receptor antagonist that selectively target cancer stem cells.

              Selective targeting of cancer stem cells (CSCs) offers promise for a new generation of therapeutics. However, assays for both human CSCs and normal stem cells that are amenable to robust biological screens are limited. Using a discovery platform that reveals differences between neoplastic and normal human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC), we identify small molecules from libraries of known compounds that induce differentiation to overcome neoplastic self-renewal. Surprisingly, thioridazine, an antipsychotic drug, selectively targets the neoplastic cells, and impairs human somatic CSCs capable of in vivo leukemic disease initiation while having no effect on normal blood SCs. The drug antagonizes dopamine receptors that are expressed on CSCs and on breast cancer cells as well. These results suggest that dopamine receptors may serve as a biomarker for diverse malignancies, demonstrate the utility of using neoplastic hPSCs for identifying CSC-targeting drugs, and provide support for the use of differentiation as a therapeutic strategy. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/183044
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/796
                URI : http://frontiersin.org/people/u/199599
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                03 March 2015
                2015
                : 5
                : 37
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of BioSciences, Rice University , Houston, TX, USA
                [2] 2Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University , Houston, TX, USA
                [3] 3Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv, Israel
                [4] 4Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv, Israel
                [5] 5Department of Bioengineering, Rice University , Houston, TX, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mercedes Salido, University of Cadiz, Spain

                Reviewed by: Takeshi Yuasa, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Japan; Ping Mu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA

                *Correspondence: Mary C. Farach-Carson, Department of BioSciences, Rice University, 6100 Main Street MS 140, Houston, TX 77005, USA e-mail: farachca@ 123456rice.edu

                This article was submitted to Genitourinary Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology.

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2015.00037
                4347593
                25785244
                595cfdee-8a49-425d-bec4-6e4dffb287dc
                Copyright © 2015 Grigore, Ben-Jacob and Farach-Carson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 December 2014
                : 03 February 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Equations: 2, References: 201, Pages: 19, Words: 18617
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences
                Award ID: NIH/NCI PO1 CA98912
                Categories
                Oncology
                Hypothesis and Theory

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                prostate cancer,neuroendocrine differentiation,neural differentiation,interleukin-6,chromogranin a

                Comments

                Comment on this article