0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Comparison of Complete and Incomplete Suppression of Pituitary-Gonadal Activity in Girls with Central Precocious Puberty: Influence on Growth and Predicted Final Height

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The question as to whether treatment with short-acting or with slow-release gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists has different effects on growth and bone maturation when treating girls with central precocious puberty has not yet been studied. In a meta-analysis, we compared 21 naive girls with central precocious puberty who were treated with buserelin with 22 naive girls with central precocious puberty who received Decapeptyl in depot form. Treatment lasted for at least 18 months. At the start of therapy, chronological age, bone age, growth velocity and pubertal stage in the two groups were very similar. During the first 6 months of treatment, significantly more phases of incomplete suppression of pituitary-gonadal activity occurred in the buserelin group. As a result, growth velocity and bone maturation (Δ bone age/Δ chronological age) remained significantly higher than in the Decapeptyl Depot group (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01, respectively). In contrast to the Decapeptyl Depot group, the height standard deviation score (SDS) for bone age in the buserelin group did not change significantly in the first 6 months of treatment, and the predicted adult height decreased. Between the 6th and 18th months of therapy, the development of growth rate, Δ bone age/Δ chronological age, height SDS for bone age and predicted adult height in both groups became almost identical. However, the rate of growth and bone maturation in the buserelin group remained faster than in the Decapeptyl group, though not significantly so. The mean predicted adult height had risen significantly after 18 months in the Decapeptyl Depot group but not in the group treated with buserelin. Treatment with the slow-release GnRH agonist Decapeptyl Depot is more effective for children with central precocious puberty than therapy with the short-acting agonist buserelin, not only with regard to long-term compliance but also for auxological reasons, since Decapeptyl Depot suppresses gonadotropins and oestradiol faster and more completely at least during the first 6 months of treatment.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          HRE
          Horm Res Paediatr
          10.1159/issn.1663-2818
          Hormone Research in Paediatrics
          S. Karger AG
          1663-2818
          1663-2826
          1993
          1993
          03 December 2008
          : 39
          : 3-4
          : 111-117
          Affiliations
          Children’s Hospitals, Universities of aKiel, FRG, bLeiden, cAmsterdam, dRotterdam, The Netherlands
          Article
          182709 Horm Res 1993;39:111–117
          10.1159/000182709
          8262471
          © 1993 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 7
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article