4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Biodegradable Polyurethane Dermal Matrix in Reconstruction of Free Flap Donor Sites: A Pilot Study

      research-article
      , BSc(Hons), MBBS, PhD, FRCS(Plast), FRACS a , b , , BAppSc, MPhys a , , MBBS b , , BBioMedSci, BMBS b , , MBBS, MS, MCh, FRACS b , , AM, BSc(Hons), MBChB, MD, DHlthSc, FRCS(Eng), FRCS(Plast), FRACS a ,
      Eplasty
      Open Science Company, LLC
      biodegradable polyurethane, synthetic dermal matrix, dermal scaffold, free flap donor site, reconstruction

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We have developed a biodegradable temporizing matrix (BTM) capable of supporting secondary split-skin graft-take in animal studies. We report its first long-term implantation and use as a dermal scaffold in humans. This preliminary study assesses its ability to integrate, its ease of delamination, its ability to sustain split-skin graft in complex wounds, the degree of wound contraction, and ultimately the quality of the scar at 1 year postimplantation. Ten patients were recruited, each requiring elective free flap reconstruction. Free flap donor sites created were anterolateral thigh flaps, fibular osseocutaneous flaps, or radial/ulnar forearm (RF/UF) flaps. The BTM was implanted when the flap was detached from its donor site. Dressing changes were performed twice weekly. The time elapsed between implantation and delamination depended on the type of flap and thus the wound bed left. Once integrated, the BTMs were delaminated in theatre, and the surface of the “neodermis” was refreshed by dermabrasion, prior to application of a split-skin graft. The BTM integration occurred in all patients (100% in 6 patients, with 90%, 84%, 76%, and 60% integration in the remainder). Integrated BTM sustained successful graft-take in all patients. Complete take was marred in 2 patients, over areas of BTM that had not integrated and graft application was performed too early. The BTM can be applied into wounds in humans and can integrate, persist in the presence of infection, and sustain split-skin overgrafting, despite the trial group presenting with significant comorbidities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.

          Scar rating scales have the potential to contribute to better evaluation of scar properties in both research and clinical settings. Despite a large number of scars assessment scales being available, there is limited information regarding the clinimetric properties of many of these scales. The purpose of the review was to inform clinical and research practice by determining the quality and appropriateness of existing scales. This review summarises the available evidence for the clinimetric properties of reliability, validity (including responsiveness), interpretability and feasibility of existing scales. Electronic searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library databases from 1990 onwards were used to identify English articles related to burn scar assessment scales. Scales were critically reviewed for clinimetric properties that were reported in, but not necessarily the focus of studies. A total of 29 studies provided data for 18 different scar rating scales. Most scar rating scales assessed vascularity, pliability, height and thickness. Some scales contained additional items such as itch. Only the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) received a high quality rating but only in the area of reliability for total scores and the subscale vascularity. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) received indeterminate ratings for construct validity, reliability and responsiveness. Where evidence was available, all other criteria for the POSAS, VSS and the remaining 17 scales received an indeterminate rating due to methodological issues, or a low quality rating. Poorly defined hypotheses limited the ability to give a high quality rating to data pertaining to construct validity, responsiveness and interpretability. No scale had empirical testing of content validity and no scale was of sufficient quality to consider criterion validity. The POSAS, with high quality reliability but indeterminate validity, was considered to be superior in performance based on existing evidence. The VSS had the most thorough review of clnimetrics although available data received indeterminate quality ratings. On the basis of the evidence, the use of total scores has not been supported, nor has the measurement of pigmentation using a categorical scale. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outcome after burns: an observational study on burn scar maturation and predictors for severe scarring.

            Long-term outcome of burn scars as well as the relation with clinically relevant parameters has not been studied quantitatively. Therefore, we conducted a detailed analysis on the clinical changes of burn scars in a longitudinal setup. In addition, we focused on the differences in scar quality in relation to the depth, etiology of the burn wound and age of the patient. Burn scars of 474 patients were subjected to a scar assessment protocol 3, 6, and 12 months postburn. Three different age groups were defined (≤5, 5-18, and ≥18 years). The observer part of the patient and observer scar assessment scale revealed a significant (p   0.230) have no significant influence on scar quality when corrected for sex, total body surface area burned, time, and age or etiology, respectively.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Radial forearm flap donor-site complications and morbidity: a prospective study.

              One-hundred patients undergoing radial forearm flap reconstruction in the head and neck over a 2-year period were followed prospectively to assess complications and morbidity associated with the radial flap donor site. Eighty-six patients were available follow-up at 3 months and 74 at 1 year (49 fasciocutaneous, 25 composite). Partial loss of the donor-site skin graft occurred in 14 patients (16 percent), with exposure of tendons in 11 patients (13 percent). Delay in healing of the split-thickness skin graft at the donor site occurred in 19 patients (22 percent). Fracture of the radius occurred in 6 of 35 patients with composite flaps (17 percent). Superficial radial nerve sensation was reduced in 24 patients (32 percent) at 1 year. Ten patients (14 percent) reported cold intolerance, and 21 patients (28 percent) complained of poor aesthetic result. Function of the donor arm was restricted in 8 patients (16 percent) in the fasciocutaneous group, in 7 patients (36 percent) in the composite group without fracture, and in all patients who had a fracture of the radius following harvesting of composite flaps. Detailed measurements of forearm circumference, grip strength, pinch strength, and wrist movements showed greater reduction in these parameters in patients reporting restricted function compared with those reporting normal function. It is concluded that there is a low incidence of long-term morbidity associated with fasciocutaneous flaps and a higher incidence with composite flaps. Fracture of the radius results in reduced function in all cases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eplasty
                Eplasty
                ePlasty
                Eplasty
                Open Science Company, LLC
                1937-5719
                2015
                24 April 2015
                : 15
                : e13
                Affiliations
                [1] aAdult Burn Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [2] bDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                Author notes
                Article
                13
                4412164
                25987938
                5a945636-114b-483f-9c33-27ad82b2a957
                Copyright © 2015 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Journal Article

                Surgery
                biodegradable polyurethane,synthetic dermal matrix,dermal scaffold,free flap donor site,reconstruction

                Comments

                Comment on this article