Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy.

Grove, William M.; Meehl, Paul E.

doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy.

Author(s): William M. Grove , Paul E. Meehl

Publication date Created: 1996

Publication date (Print): 1996

Journal: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Title: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Abbreviated Title: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)

ISSN (Print): 1076-8971

Publication date Created: 1996

Publication date (Print): 1996

Volume: 2

Issue: 2

Pages: 293-323

Article

DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293

SO-VID: 5af2832b-17c8-4601-a3cb-603b26030c50

History

Data availability:

Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy.

Read this article at

Related collections

Core Readings in Statistical Mediation Analysis

Author and article information

Journal

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 1,224

Cited by 163