0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of comparing enhanced acceptance and commitment therapy plus (+) added to usual aftercare versus usual aftercare only, in patients living with or beyond cancer: SUrvivors’ Rehabilitation Evaluation after CANcer (SURECAN) trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract 

          Background

          Two million people in the UK are living with or beyond cancer and a third of them report poor quality of life (QoL) due to problems such as fatigue, fear of cancer recurrence, and concerns about returning to work. We aimed to develop and evaluate an intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), suited to address the concerns of cancer survivors and in improving their QoL. We also recognise the importance of exercise and vocational activity on QoL and therefore will integrate options for physical activity and return to work/vocational support, thus ACT Plus (+).

          Methods

          We will conduct a multi-centre, pragmatic, theory driven, randomised controlled trial. We will assess whether ACT+ including usual aftercare (intervention) is more effective and cost-effective than usual aftercare alone (control). The primary outcome is QoL of participants living with or beyond cancer measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General scale (FACT-G) at 52 weeks. We will recruit 344 participants identified from secondary care sites who have completed hospital-based treatment for cancer with curative intent, with low QoL (determined by the FACT-G) and randomise with an allocation ratio of 1:1 to the intervention or control. The intervention (ACT+) will be delivered by NHS Talking Therapies, specialist services, and cancer charities. The intervention consists of up to eight sessions at weekly or fortnightly intervals using different modalities of delivery to suit individual needs, i.e. face-to-face sessions, over the phone or skype.

          Discussion

          To date, there have been no robust trials reporting both clinical and cost-effectiveness of an ACT based intervention for people with low QoL after curative cancer treatment in the UK. We will provide high quality evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding ACT+ to usual aftercare provided by the NHS. If shown to be effective and cost-effective then commissioners, providers and cancer charities will know how to improve QoL in cancer survivors and their families.

          Trial registration

          ISRCTN: ISRCTN67900293. Registered on 09 December 2019.

          All items from the World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set for this protocol can be found in Additional file 2 Table S1.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-024-08062-4.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

          A self-assessment scale has been developed and found to be a reliable instrument for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of an hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depressive subscales are also valid measures of severity of the emotional disorder. It is suggested that the introduction of the scales into general hospital practice would facilitate the large task of detection and management of emotional disorder in patients under investigation and treatment in medical and surgical departments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

            Purpose This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure. Methods EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions. Results Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states. Conclusions A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance.

              The present research describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a second version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II), which assesses the construct referred to as, variously, acceptance, experiential avoidance, and psychological inflexibility. Results from 2,816 participants across six samples indicate the satisfactory structure, reliability, and validity of this measure. For example, the mean alpha coefficient is .84 (.78-.88), and the 3- and 12-month test-retest reliability is .81 and .79, respectively. Results indicate that AAQ-II scores concurrently, longitudinally, and incrementally predict a range of outcomes, from mental health to work absence rates, that are consistent with its underlying theory. The AAQ-II also demonstrates appropriate discriminant validity. The AAQ-II appears to measure the same concept as the AAQ-I (r=.97) but with better psychometric consistency. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Imran.Khan@qmul.ac.uk
                s.j.c.taylor@qmul.ac.uk
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                2 April 2024
                2 April 2024
                2024
                : 25
                : 228
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Barts and the London Centre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, ( https://ror.org/026zzn846) London, UK
                [2 ]Barts and the London Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, ( https://ror.org/026zzn846) London, UK
                [3 ]Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, ( https://ror.org/00bmj0a71) London, UK
                [4 ]Dept. Allied Health Professionals, Sheffield Hallam University, ( https://ror.org/019wt1929) Sheffield, UK
                [5 ]Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, ( https://ror.org/026zzn846) London, UK
                [6 ]Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Wadham College, University of Oxford, ( https://ror.org/052gg0110) Oxford, UK
                [7 ]The Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, ( https://ror.org/05krs5044) Sheffield, UK
                [8 ]School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, ( https://ror.org/04ycpbx82) New Cavendish St, London, UK
                [9 ]The Barts and the London Unit for Psychological Medicine, Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, ( https://ror.org/026zzn846) London, UK
                [10 ]Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, ( https://ror.org/01ryk1543) Southampton, UK
                [11 ]Independent Cancer Patient’s Voice (ICPV), 17 Woodbridge Street, London, UK
                [12 ]University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ( https://ror.org/042fqyp44) London, UK
                [13 ]Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, DeCrespigny Park, ( https://ror.org/0220mzb33) London, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7410
                Article
                8062
                10.1186/s13063-024-08062-4
                10985882
                5b1d34aa-6506-493e-a8c6-ac1ed0eb5d20
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 12 December 2023
                : 18 March 2024
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Medicine
                acceptance and commitment therapy,cancer survivor,quality of life,pragmatic trial
                Medicine
                acceptance and commitment therapy, cancer survivor, quality of life, pragmatic trial

                Comments

                Comment on this article