7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Creating a Defined Process to Improve the Timeliness of Serious Safety Event Determination and Root Cause Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Introduction:

          Serious Safety Events (SSEs) are defined as events in which there is a deviation from clinically accepted performance standards, causation, and significant patient harm or death. Given the nature of SSEs, it is important that the processes for declaration of SSEs, the performance of a root cause analysis (RCA), and action plan formation occur quickly, such that the window for potential recurrence of similar events is as small as possible. This manuscript describes a process put in place to improve the timeliness of SSE determination and RCA conduction and evaluates the effect of the process change on these parameters.

          Methods:

          A causal analysis was performed of the baseline process to determine factors contributing to long process times. A new process was created and implemented both for the SSE determination process and the RCA completion process. We calculated the mean time for the pre-implementation phase (April 2016–December 2017) and the post-implementation phase (March 2018–January 2019) for both SSE determination and RCA completion. We evaluated differences with a two-sided t test assuming unequal variances.

          Results:

          Comparing pre- versus post- implementation phases, the mean time for SSE determination for events that met the SSE criteria decreased from 38.4 to 4.8 days ( P < 0.0001), determination for events that did not meet the SSE criteria decreased from 38.4 to 3.8 days ( P < 0.0001), and RCA completion time dropped from 118.0 to 26.2 days ( P < 0.0001).

          Conclusions:

          A targeted intervention can significantly reduce SSE determination and RCA conduction times.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comprehensive patient safety program can significantly reduce preventable harm, associated costs, and hospital mortality.

          To evaluate the effectiveness of a hospital-wide initiative to improve patient safety by implementing high-reliability practices as part of a quality improvement (QI) program aimed at reducing all preventable harm. A hospital wide quasi-experimental time series QI initiative using high-reliability concepts, microsystem-based multidisciplinary teams, and QI science tools to reduce hospital acquired harm was implemented. Extensive error prevention training was provided for all employees. Change concepts were enacted using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement. Compliance with change packages was measured. Between 2010 and 2012, the serious safety event rate decreased from 1.15 events to 0.19 event per 10 000 adjusted hospital-days, an 83.3% reduction (P < .001). Preventable harm events decreased by 53%, from a quarterly peak of 150 in the first quarter of 2010 to 71 in the fourth quarter of 2012 (P < .01). Observed hospital mortality decreased from 1.0% to 0.75% (P < .001), although severity-adjusted expected mortality actually increased slightly, and estimated harm-related hospital costs decreased by 22.0%. Hospital-wide safety climate scores increased significantly. Substantial reductions in serious safety event rate, preventable harm, hospital mortality, and cost were seen after implementation of our multifaceted approach. Measurable improvements in the safety culture were noted as well. Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Children’s Hospitals’ Solutions for Patient Safety Collaborative Impact on Hospital-Acquired Harm

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Veterans Affairs root cause analysis system in action.

              The patient safety program in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began in 1998, when the National Center for Patient Safety (NCPS) was established to lead the effort on a day-to-day basis. NCPS provides the structure, training, and tools, and VA facilities provide front-line expertise, feedback about the process, and root cause analysis (RCA) of adverse events and close calls. Facility patient safety managers determine the disposition of adverse events and close calls occurring at their facilities. They use a safety assessment code (SAC) to prioritize the actual and potential severity and frequency of an event. BEFORE-AND-AFTER STUDY: Before the new RCA system was implemented in 2000, the VA used another adverse event reporting system, focused review (FR). A comparison of the two processes indicates that the RCA process has shifted analyses of adverse events toward a human factors engineering approach-entailing a search for system vulnerabilities rather than human errors and other less actionable root causes. Two case examples--on hazards in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) room and on a cardiac pacemaker malfunction--illustrate how the RCA system works in actual operation. The cases illustrate that broadly applicable, high-impact actions can result from a thorough RCA process. NCPS monitors the quality and completeness of RCAs through the immediate review and feedback process. Still to be investigated is the effectiveness of RCA actions addressing the hypothesized root causes and contributing factors of the close calls and adverse events.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pediatr Qual Saf
                Pediatr Qual Saf
                PQS
                Pediatric Quality & Safety
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                2472-0054
                Sep-Oct 2019
                07 August 2019
                : 4
                : 5
                : e200
                Affiliations
                From the [* ]Center for Pediatric and Maternal Value, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital – Stanford, Stanford Children’s Health
                []Stanford University, School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Address: Lane F. Donnelly, MD, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Children’s Health, The Barn, 700 Welch Rd. Suite 125 (Room #104), Palo Alto, CA 94304, PH: 650-497-0722, Email: lane.donnelly@ 123456stanford.edu
                Article
                00001
                10.1097/pq9.0000000000000200
                6831051
                5b64012e-f2b8-4800-a7d7-3e5e1724358b
                Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 1 March 2019
                : 4 July 2019
                Categories
                Individual QI projects from single institutions
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article