25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Unwashed Doctors

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, My career in the US Navy was a good one. I was an epidemiologist for many years, chasing disease and pestilence around the globe. I even became well versed in biological and chemical warfare (BCW) countermeasures. When I left active duty, I became a chemical action officer at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland and there I developed an even healthier respect for what societies could do to each other and what could happen even by accident. My days associated with BCW led me to become very respectful of bugs and drugs (microbes and intoxicants). Eventually, I became an anesthesiologist and intensivist, and I still have a keen interest in bugs and drugs. In fact, it is sort of my business to know them intimately. My workspace is the high-stress environment of the intensive care unit (as it is for many other physicians, nurses, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, etc.). Thus, my colleagues and I have exposures on a regular basis to low velocity missiles (sharp objects), inhaled toxins (aerosolized ribavirin), loud noises, and alarms that frequently scream, “This is not a drill, this is not a drill.” And, of course, we are exposed to biological weapons such as blood, saliva, sneezes, vomit, urine, feces, and cerebral spinal fluid, which all may contain nasty viruses and spectacularly effective bacteria of near-bio-warfare equivalence. In Navy BCW drills, Navy Medical Officers learn to don gas masks and Mission Oriented Protective Posture (MOPP) gear in rapid fashion. For in no way were we going to allow ourselves to be placed in peril or be injured, thereby putting at risk those around us who counted on our particular skills, simply because we did not know how to properly take preventive measures, or countermeasures. In view of such experiences I, and my colleagues of like mind, are saddened as we walk through the institutions of higher medical education around the country, and find that grown men and women who call themselves “Doctor” cannot even take the time to wash their hands in the civilian equivalent of a BCW environment. I see hand washing being ignored far, far too often. My US Navy junior enlisted personnel performed better than America's “most educated”. Sarcasm aside, this is a travesty in regard to patient safety. I do not care how many papers you have published, or how many patients or dollars you draw to the hospital, you are on notice, sir or madam, that your behavior is no longer to be tolerated. Fines and suspension may face you in the days ahead.[1] Thomas Jefferson once said, “In matters of style, swim with the current, in matters of principle stand like a rock!” This applies especially to today's situation regarding hand washing. Many of us have children, and we certainly do not want our children to acquire bad habits. We look askance at people who smoke in front of their children, we cringe when parents shout or yell or misbehave in front of children in public generally, or at sporting events in particular. If we were so concerned about role modeling for our children, why would we not wash our hands in front of our medical students or residents?[2] Remember see one, do one, teach one? Do not think for a moment that it does not apply here, and that an attending physician is not an important role model.[3 4] What is truly embarrassing is that patients‘ families now notice it, and comment on it frequently. A culture of safety is being emphasized throughout the nation. We have gone through check lists, crew resource management, hand-offs, electronic medical records, team-building, etc., but what kind of arrogance prevents us from washing our hands when we enter a patient's room, and what halts colleagues and other health workers from pointing it out to the offenders? I have no good answer. Hand washing is one of the bedrocks of patient safety. It is a simple and effective counter-measure in a potentially hostile environment. The lack of hand washing puts our patients in harm's way. As Moliere said, “It is not only what we do, but also what we do not do, for which we are accountable.”

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Balancing "no blame" with accountability in patient safety.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hand contamination of anesthesia providers is an important risk factor for intraoperative bacterial transmission.

            We have recently shown that intraoperative bacterial transmission to patient IV stopcock sets is associated with increased patient mortality. In this study, we hypothesized that bacterial contamination of anesthesia provider hands before patient contact is a risk factor for direct intraoperative bacterial transmission. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is a tertiary care and level 1 trauma center with 400 inpatient beds and 28 operating suites. The first and second operative cases in each of 92 operating rooms were randomly selected for analysis. Eighty-two paired samples were analyzed. Ten pairs of cases were excluded because of broken or missing sampling protocol and lost samples. We identified cases of intraoperative bacterial transmission to the patient IV stopcock set and the anesthesia environment (adjustable pressure-limiting valve and agent dial) in each operating room pair by using a previously validated protocol. We then used biotype analysis to compare these transmitted organisms to those organisms isolated from the hands of anesthesia providers obtained before the start of each case. Provider-origin transmission was defined as potential pathogens isolated in the patient stopcock set or environment that had an identical biotype to the same organism isolated from hands of providers. We also assessed the efficacy of the current intraoperative cleaning protocol by evaluating isolated potential pathogens identified at the start of case 2. Poor intraoperative cleaning was defined as 1 or more potential pathogens found in the anesthesia environment at the start of case 2 that were not there at the beginning of case 1. We collected clinical and epidemiological data on all the cases to identify risk factors for contamination. One hundred sixty-four cases (82 case pairs) were studied. We identified intraoperative bacterial transmission to the IV stopcock set in 11.5 % (19/164) of cases, 47% (9/19) of which were of provider origin. We identified intraoperative bacterial transmission to the anesthesia environment in 89% (146/164) of cases, 12% (17/146) of which were of provider origin. The number of rooms that an attending anesthesiologist supervised simultaneously, the age of the patient, and patient discharge from the operating room to an intensive care unit were independent predictors of bacterial transmission events not directly linked to providers. The contaminated hands of anesthesia providers serve as a significant source of patient environmental and stopcock set contamination in the operating room. Additional sources of intraoperative bacterial transmission, including postoperative environmental cleaning practices, should be further studied.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Inverse correlation between level of professional education and rate of handwashing compliance in a teaching hospital.

              To evaluate educational level as a contributing factor in handwashing compliance. Observation of hand washing opportunities was performed for approximately 12 weeks before an announced Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) visit and for approximately 10 weeks after the visit. Trained observers recorded the date, time, and location of the observation; the type of healthcare worker or hospital employee observed; and the type of hand hygiene opportunity observed. University of Toledo Medical Center, a 319-bed teaching hospital. A total of 2,373 observations were performed. The rate of hand washing compliance among nurses was 91.3% overall. Medical attending physicians had the lowest observed rate of compliance (72.4%; P<.001). Nurses showed statistically significant improvement in their rate of hand hygiene compliance after the JCAHO visit (P = .001), but no improvement was seen for attending physicians (P = .117). The compliance rate in the surgical intensive care unit was more than 90%, greater than that in other hospital units (P = .001). Statistically, the compliance rate was better during the first part of the week (Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday) than during the latter part of the week (Thursday and Friday) (P = .002), and the compliance rate was better during the 3 PM-11 PM shift, compared with the 7 AM-3 PM shift (P<.001). When evaluated by logistic regression analysis, non-physician healthcare worker status and observation after the JCAHO accreditation visit were associated with an increased rate of hand hygiene compliance. An inverse correlation existed between the level of professional educational and the rate of compliance. Future research initiatives may need to address the different motivating factors for hand hygiene among nurses and physicians to increase compliance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci
                IJCIIS
                International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science
                Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd (India )
                2229-5151
                2231-5004
                Jan-Jun 2011
                : 1
                : 1
                : 87-88
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Room No. 431, Doan Hall, 410 West 10 th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Thomas J. Papadimos, Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Room No. 431, Doan Hall, 410 West 10 th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. E-mail: thomas.papadimos@ 123456osumc.edu
                Article
                IJCIIS-1-87
                10.4103/2229-5151.79291
                3209987
                22096780
                5b7457de-499e-44c5-8ec5-96f9af175e56
                Copyright: © International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article