2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The landscape of biomedical research funding in Brazil: a current overview

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Objective:

          The objective of this narrative review is to discuss the current state of research funding in Brazil.

          Materials and Methods:

          This study is based on the most recent edition of the course Funding for Research and Innovation in the University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine which was a three-day course with 12 hours of instruction. The course brought together leading experts in the field to comprehensively discuss the current state of research funding in Brazil. Each speaker provided a presentation on a specific topic related to research funding. After the workshop, speakers assembled relevant topics in this manuscript.

          Results:

          collaborative research is critical for securing research funding. It optimizes proposal competitiveness, amplifies societal impact, and manages risks effectively. As such, fostering and supporting these collaborations is paramount for both researchers and funding agencies. To maintain the highest integrity in research, investigators involved in these collaborations must disclose any relationships that could potentially influence the outcomes or interpretation of their projects.

          Conclusions:

          In Brazil, the mainstay of research funding stems from public entities, with agencies such as CNPq, CAPES, and state bodies like FAPESP, FAPERJ, FAPEMIG and others at the forefront. Concurrently, industry funding offers viable pathways, especially through industry-sponsored studies, investigator-led projects, and collaborative initiatives. The Brazilian funding landscape is further enriched by innovative platforms, including crowdfunding and the contributions of institutions like the Serrapilheira Institute. Internationally, esteemed organizations such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation stand out as potential funders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Industry sponsorship and research outcome.

          Clinical research affecting how doctors practice medicine is increasingly sponsored by companies that make drugs and medical devices. Previous systematic reviews have found that pharmaceutical-industry sponsored studies are more often favorable to the sponsor's product compared with studies with other sources of sponsorship. A similar association between sponsorship and outcomes have been found for device studies, but the body of evidence is not as strong as for sponsorship of drug studies. This review is an update of a previous Cochrane review and includes empirical studies on the association between sponsorship and research outcome.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Matthew effect in science funding

            Why do scientists with similar backgrounds and abilities often end up achieving very different degrees of success? A classic explanation is that academic achievement exhibits a “Matthew effect”: Early successes increase future success chances. We analyze data from a large academic funding program that present a unique opportunity to quantify the Matthew effect and identify generative mechanisms. Our results show that winners just above the funding threshold accumulate more than twice as much funding during the subsequent eight years as nonwinners with near-identical review scores that fall just below the threshold. This effect is partly caused by nonwinners ceasing to compete for other funding opportunities, revealing a “participation” mechanism driving the Matthew effect. A classic thesis is that scientific achievement exhibits a “Matthew effect”: Scientists who have previously been successful are more likely to succeed again, producing increasing distinction. We investigate to what extent the Matthew effect drives the allocation of research funds. To this end, we assembled a dataset containing all review scores and funding decisions of grant proposals submitted by recent PhDs in a €2 billion granting program. Analyses of review scores reveal that early funding success introduces a growing rift, with winners just above the funding threshold accumulating more than twice as much research funding (€180,000) during the following eight years as nonwinners just below it. We find no evidence that winners’ improved funding chances in subsequent competitions are due to achievements enabled by the preceding grant, which suggests that early funding itself is an asset for acquiring later funding. Surprisingly, however, the emergent funding gap is partly created by applicants, who, after failing to win one grant, apply for another grant less often.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons.

              Medical research is a prerequisite of clinical advances, while health service research supports improved delivery, access, and cost. Few previous analyses have compared the United States with other developed countries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int Braz J Urol
                Int Braz J Urol
                ibju
                International Brazilian Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
                Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
                1677-5538
                1677-6119
                18 March 2024
                Mar-Apr 2024
                : 50
                : 2
                : 209-222
                Affiliations
                [1 ] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina orgdiv2Departamento de Urologia São Paulo SP Brasil originalDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
                [2 ] orgnameUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana orgdiv1Departamento de Cirurgia Feira de Santana BA Brasil originalDepartamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana - UEFS, Feira de Santana, BA, Brasil;
                [3 ] orgnamePontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brasil originalPontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUC RS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil;
                [4 ] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Faculdade de Medicina orgdiv2Unidade de Apoio à Pesquisa e Inovação São Paulo SP Brasil originalUnidade de Apoio à Pesquisa e Inovação, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
                [5 ] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Faculdade de Medicina orgdiv2Departamento de Patologia São Paulo SP Brasil originalDepartamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
                [6 ] orgnameFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Hospital das Clínicas orgdiv2Instituto do Coração São Paulo SP Brasil originalInstituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
                [7 ] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Escola de Enfermagem São Paulo SP Brasil originalEscola de Enfermagem da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
                [8 ] orgnameInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino São Paulo SP Brasil originalInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
                [9 ] orgnameUniversidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro orgdiv1Unidade de Pesquisa Urogenital Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil originalUnidade de Pesquisa Urogenital – Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
                Author notes
                Correspondence address: Cristiano Mendes Gomes, MD Divisão de Clinica Urológica Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina USP Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 – 710F São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brasil Fax: +55 113064-7013 E-mail: crismgomes@ 123456uol.com.br

                CONFLICT OF INTEREST

                None declared.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8486-4003
                Article
                S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9905
                10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9905
                10953608
                38386791
                5c6e6e8a-fc2e-4224-88b3-8dc89be51b09

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 December 2023
                : 02 January 2024
                : 31 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 66, Pages: 14
                Categories
                Original Article

                biomedical research,economics,financing, government,brazil

                Comments

                Comment on this article