5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Development of a mobile responsive online learning module on Psychosocial and mental health issues related to COVID 19

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The direct and indirect mental health and psychosocial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are pervasive and could affect mental health now and in the time to come (Holmes et al., 2020). There is a need for building the capacity of trained health providers who can identify and provide suitable interventions for mental health issues arising out of this pandemic in their community. In the current scenario of physical distancing, restriction on movements, and urgency to disseminate the accurate and appropriate information (Tandon, 2020), NIMHANS Digital Academy developed an online learning program on mental health and psychological issues in COVID 19, intended for counselors. This one week or ten hours module consisted of two hours of NIMHANS tele-ECHO multipoint video-conference sessions (Mehrotra et al., 2018) followed by eight hours of self-paced e-learning. There were five phases in the development of this online learning program. During the planning phase, the focus was on course content. A group of experts reviewed both national, international literature, websites, and guidelines (Department of Psychiatry, 2020, IASC, 2020; MOHFW, 2020). Two subject experts and five potential participants reviewed the content and provided feedback to the team. Meantime, the team members discussed each person's role in the lesson design, copyright, multimedia materials, timeline, and technological help. In the development phase, the content, as well as the instructional design, were finalized. There were four sub-modules, i.e., a. psychosocial impact on a general and specific population, b. home and hospital quarantine/isolation, c. identification and management of mental health issues and d. psychological first aid and vulnerable groups like migrant populations. An assignment was required to be completed after each sub-module. Participants with a cumulative score of 80% or more received an e-certificate. The course co-ordinators underwent a 4-6 hour training in e-learning. Moodle (Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment), an open-source software, was customized and utilized as learning management system for current training (Brandl, 2005). In our previous experience, a majority of participants used mobile phones to access learning content and to complete the mandatory assignments (Mehrotra et al., 2018). This learning platform, i.e., elearn.vknnimhans.in is a mobile friendly with an android app. We followed the revised Bloom's taxonomy, i.e., remembering, understanding, applying and analyzing, evaluating, and creating (Krathwohl and Anderson, 2009) for development of this module. During the production phase, the contents i.e. presentations, videos, audio clips and assignments (multiple choice questions, match the following and short essays) were integrated into the platform. Some of the essential topics like quarantine, assessment were developed in both Hindi and English, keeping in mind the participants’ language preferences. In the implementation phase, emails were sent to all enrolled participants regarding the steps to navigate the elearn.vknnimhans.in, use the forum for peer-led discussion and chat with course instructors, as well as co-participants. They also received a video recording on instructions to log in through the mobile phone. The course instructors joined every day, responded to the chat messages/emails, encouraged the peer-led discussions in the forum, tracked participant progress and evaluated the essay type responses. The technical team guided the technology-related issues. In the last phase, i.e., Evaluation, everyone was requested to complete a semi-structured feedback form. The following table summarizes the activities over the three weeks of the online learning. Activities Numbers of participants Expression of Interest 1100 Participated in Live NIMHANS tele-ECHO session and invited to join e-learning module 550 Filled up a brief pre-evaluation prior to join 359 Enrolled in elearn.vknnimhans.in 315 Engagement - Completed - Initiated but not Completed - Never opened 249 43 23 Scored 80% or more received e-certificate 217 Completed post-evaluation 259 As indicated in the table, seventy-nine percent of participants completed the module. This completion rate is higher in comparison to the rates reported about MOOCs (massive open online Courses). Traditionally MOOCs have reported completion rates of less than 10%. (Chamberlin and Parish, 2011). In this blended learning model, the face to face interaction took place using live tele-ECHO session. Studies have shown a blended model having better retention and learning than pure e-learning (Gambari et al., 2018). It will be speculative to comment on the high completion rate in the current e-learning without a parallel-arm. Nevertheless, the potential reasons might be the use of blended learning, the relevance of the content in the present scenario, and associated certificate of completion from the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS). NIMHANS is a premier institute under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare for patient care and academic pursuit in the sphere of mental health and neurosciences. Time constraint and internet connectivity were the most frequent reasons reported for being not able to complete (13.6%) or not opening at all (7.3%). The COVID 19 pandemic is already changing many aspects of our lives, and one of them is the process of knowledge acquisition and diffusion. There is thus potential to expand this ubiquitous, learner-centered, mobile-based e-learning in various other areas of mental health, not only during this pandemic, but beyond it. Financial Disclosure None Declaration of Competing Interest None

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science

          Summary The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a profound effect on all aspects of society, including mental health and physical health. We explore the psychological, social, and neuroscientific effects of COVID-19 and set out the immediate priorities and longer-term strategies for mental health science research. These priorities were informed by surveys of the public and an expert panel convened by the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the mental health research charity, MQ: Transforming Mental Health, in the first weeks of the pandemic in the UK in March, 2020. We urge UK research funding agencies to work with researchers, people with lived experience, and others to establish a high level coordination group to ensure that these research priorities are addressed, and to allow new ones to be identified over time. The need to maintain high-quality research standards is imperative. International collaboration and a global perspective will be beneficial. An immediate priority is collecting high-quality data on the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic across the whole population and vulnerable groups, and on brain function, cognition, and mental health of patients with COVID-19. There is an urgent need for research to address how mental health consequences for vulnerable groups can be mitigated under pandemic conditions, and on the impact of repeated media consumption and health messaging around COVID-19. Discovery, evaluation, and refinement of mechanistically driven interventions to address the psychological, social, and neuroscientific aspects of the pandemic are required. Rising to this challenge will require integration across disciplines and sectors, and should be done together with people with lived experience. New funding will be required to meet these priorities, and it can be efficiently leveraged by the UK's world-leading infrastructure. This Position Paper provides a strategy that may be both adapted for, and integrated with, research efforts in other countries.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The COVID-19 Pandemic Personal Reflections on Editorial Responsibility

            I have just returned from a 1-week academic/journal-related visit to Qatar and am informed by my medical school Dean that I will have to quarantine myself for 2 weeks before I can return to work because “I may be bringing back COVID-19 contagion”. As I am somewhat familiar with COVID-19 happenings, I am confused (and somewhat annoyed) by this directive. Although COVID-19 has affected people in half the countries around the world and the vast majority of those affected are in Asia, Qatar has just a single reported case and this individual was airlifted from Iran and has been quarantined since arrival into Qatar. It is true that over 90 percent of the confirmed cases are in Asia (China, South Korea and Iran) and Italy is reporting a dramatic increase in the number of those affected with a lockdown being declared in Northern Italy earlier today, but my travels did not take me to any of those places- I went directly from the USA to Qatar and back. After providing this explanation and noting the absence of any COVID-19 relevant symptoms, I am allowed to return to work immediately without any restrictions. Even though COVID-19 has no direct impact on me other than causing mild consternation, it gets me thinking about how this pandemic (I am not quite sure why the World Health Organization has not labelled it as one yet) will affect people and if there is any useful role that I (as the Editor-in-Chief of the Asian Journal of Psychiatry) can and should perform. I start by thinking about what just happened to me. Fear and incomplete information likely contributed to a lack of understanding that, in turn, contributed to the initial determination that I should not return to work. The fear was understandable- this is a new virus that appears to be highly contagious and deadly, we have no immunity against this virus, and while experiences in South Korea and Taiwan provide some encouragement initial trends in Italy are disturbing. Once I provided clear information about where in Asia I had travelled and that this was not where there was high COVID-19 contagion, the initial decision was immediately reversed. Accurate information leading to clear understanding was the key to enabling appropriate decision-making. Do I have any ability and responsibility as a Journal editor to enable provision of accurate COVID-19 information that is both relevant and timely? First, I ask if this fits the mission/scope of the Journal (Tandon and Keshavan, 2019; Tandon, 2020)- “a vehicle for exchange of relevant information and dissemination of knowledge and understanding across the countries of Asia and to and from the rest of the world” by addressing the following two questions: (i) Is COVID-19 relevant to psychiatry and is Psychiatry relevant to COVID-19? My instinctive answer is “of course, it is” since any international medical crisis should be of relevance to psychiatry because of both the impact of the medical condition itself on people (directly on affected persons and indirectly on their family and friends) as also the effects of society’s response (e.g., quarantine, lock-down, etc.) on mental health. As I discuss this opinion with my medical colleagues (including some psychiatrists), their immediate response is in the negative- COVID-19 is a respiratory infection/disease requiring the attention of pulmonologists, intensive care specialists, infectious disease specialists, and epidemiologists, not psychiatrists. When I discuss the mental health effects of any epidemic on the general population with specific reference to COVID-19 (Wang et al., 2020), and specific mental health challenges faced by the above healthcare professionals (Chen et al., 2020), they promptly change their opinion (some reluctantly!) and acknowledge an important place for Psychiatry. (ii) Is there any unique Asia-specific and Asian country-specific information or understanding that is worth sharing? The answer to this question is an obvious “Yes”. COVID-19 began in Asia, different Asian countries took different approaches to anticipating and managing this challenge, results vary across these Asian countries, and as other Asian countries and those around the world confront their COVID-19 challenge, there may be much to learn from the experiences of various Asian countries (particularly China with Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, and Iran). Second, there are unique circumstances across Asia that constrain what is possible such as conflict (Brennan et al., 2020), refugee crises, and political/economic realities. Having answered the first question in the affirmative, the second question I ask myself is “What information should I help disseminate, how should I seek contributions providing such useful material, and how should I review such submissions rapidly, yet fairly and effectively, so that the Journal can make relevant information available to the field in a timely manner. At this time, we had received ten submissions related to COVID-19; after an expeditious review, we accepted four for publication while finding the other six unsuitable. We published a case report in the previous issue (Goyal et al., 2020) and now publish the other three reports in the current issue (Banerjee, 2020; Bhat et al., 2020; Yao et al., 2020). I have asked Dr. Desai to compile a basic primer on must-know facts about COVID-19 for psychiatrists, which will hopefully be published in the next issue of the Journal. I have also sent out a specific request for COVID-19 mental health relevant publications focused on Asia and plan to review any such submissions expeditiously and prioritize publication of accepted articles. I hope you will find this collection of value Although COVID-19 has already caused a significant amount of devastation, we appear to be in the early stages of responding to this epidemic- it should accurately be called a pandemic as it spans across the globe. As East Asia (China, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore) appears to have weathered the initial storm, Europe appears to be the current epicenter with North America likely to be next. It is unclear as to how many cycles of COVID-19 each country may encounter. While COVID-19 presents a healthcare crisis, the economic paralysis that nations will experience because of current and future anticipated shutdowns/lockdowns and mandatory quarantines will likely be even more catastrophic. Even as there is a critical need for the world to collectively engage with the virus SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 disease it causes, there is a discernible lack of leadership at a global level. Unfortunately, there is little global coordination thus far and nations appear to have adopted a solitary (forget about other countries; violent competition for scarce resources such as personal protective equipment and ventilators; blaming and at times abusing each other; etc.) and incoherent (too little, too late; mixed messaging; etc.) response to the challenge. There is much that we can do to support each other. There is much that we can learn from each other. I hope the Journal can play a small role in helping this happen.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              MOOCs: Massive Open Online Courses or Massive and Often Obtuse Courses?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Asian J Psychiatr
                Asian J Psychiatr
                Asian Journal of Psychiatry
                Published by Elsevier B.V.
                1876-2018
                1876-2026
                18 June 2020
                18 June 2020
                : 102248
                Affiliations
                [0005]NIMHANS Digital Academy, Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), 29, Bangalore, India
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. chand@ 123456nimhans.ac.in
                Article
                S1876-2018(20)30360-9 102248
                10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102248
                7301106
                5d5832de-cd2f-4037-a360-7b4480baf5c6
                © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 15 June 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article