0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      When Would a State Crack Down on Fake News? Explaining Variation in the Governance of Fake News in Asia-Pacific

      1
      Political Studies Review
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article sets out to explain national variation in the governance of fake news; it asks, under what conditions would governments pursue securitization in order to address the threat of fake news? Through a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 24 countries in Asia-Pacific, this article explores multicausal explanations behind why some countries have moved to securitize fake news—framing it as an existential threat and justifying the passing of laws that curtail civil liberties—while others do not. The analysis yields two main findings. First, although prevailing political arguments emphasize the threat of fake news to society and national security as justification for the securitization of fake news, this condition is neither necessary nor sufficient in causally accounting for the decision to crackdown on fake news. Conversely, crackdowns on fake news occur more frequently in countries less affected by fake news. Second, the analysis provides a set of two distinct, theoretically and empirically relevant causal pathways explaining the decision to crack down on fake news; the first pathway shows how non-democratic states without media freedom and which are relatively less affected by fake news instrumentalize the issue to restrict freedom of speech further; the second pathway shows how non-democratic states experiencing economic growth and political turbulence with proximate elections attempt to restrict freedom of speech. The findings suggest that implementations of broad legislation may not be an optimal approach, given that they appear to be more motivated by political circumstances than by the objective resolution of the problem.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Defining “Fake News”

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Political Studies Review
                Political Studies Review
                SAGE Publications
                1478-9299
                1478-9302
                August 2022
                May 27 2021
                August 2022
                : 20
                : 3
                : 390-409
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
                Article
                10.1177/14789299211013984
                5d605203-ea0c-431f-807c-e7ee25b310ee
                © 2022

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article