7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiparametric MRI model with dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted imaging enables breast cancer diagnosis with high accuracy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The MRI Breast Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) lexicon recommends that a breast MRI protocol contain T 2‐weighted and dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI sequences. The addition of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) significantly improves diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to clarify which descriptors from DCE‐MRI, DWI, and T 2‐weighted imaging are most strongly associated with a breast cancer diagnosis.

          Purpose/Hypothesis

          To develop a multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) model for breast cancer diagnosis incorporating American College of Radiology (ACR) BI‐RADS recommended descriptors for breast MRI with DCE, T 2‐weighted imaging, and DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping.

          Study Type

          Retrospective.

          Subjects

          In all, 188 patients (mean 51.6 years) with 210 breast tumors (136 malignant and 74 benign) who underwent mpMRI from December 2010 to September 2014.

          Field Strength/Sequence

          IR inversion recovert DCE‐MRI dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging VIBE Volume‐Interpolated‐Breathhold‐Examination FLASH turbo fast‐low‐angle‐shot TWIST Time‐resolved angiography with stochastic Trajectories.

          Assessment

          Two radiologists in consensus and another radiologist independently evaluated the mpMRI data. Characteristics for mass ( n = 182) and nonmass ( n = 28) lesions were recorded on DCE and T 2‐weighted imaging according to BI‐RADS, as well as DWI descriptors. Two separate models were analyzed, using DCE‐MRI BI‐RADS descriptors, T 2‐weighted imagines, and ADCmean as either a continuous or binary form using a previously published ADC cutoff value of ≤1.25 × 10 −3 mm 2/sec for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Histopathology was the standard of reference.

          Statistical Tests

          χ 2 test, Fisher's exact test, Kruskal–Wallis test, Pearson correlation coefficient, multivariate logistic regression analysis, Hosmer–Lemeshow test of goodness‐of‐fit, receiver operating characteristics analysis.

          Results

          In Model 1, ADCmean ( P = 0.0031), mass margins with DCE ( P = 0.0016), and delayed enhancement with DCE ( P = 0.0016) were significantly and independently associated with breast cancer diagnosis; Model 2 identified ADCmean ( P = 0.0031), mass margins with DCE ( P = 0.0012), initial enhancement ( P = 0.0422), and delayed enhancement with DCE ( P = 0.0065) to be significantly independently associated with breast cancer diagnosis. T 2‐weighted imaging variables were not included in the final models.

          Data Conclusion

          mpMRI with DCE‐MRI and DWI with ADC mapping enables accurate breast cancer diagnosis. A model using quantitative and qualitative descriptors from DCE‐MRI and DWI identifies breast cancer with a high diagnostic accuracy. T 2‐weighted imaging does not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis.

          Level of Evidence: 3

          Technical Efficacy: Stage 2

          J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:864–874.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging

          The aim of breast MRI is to obtain a reliable evaluation of any lesion within the breast. It is currently always used as an adjunct to the standard diagnostic procedures of the breast, i.e., clinical examination, mammography and ultrasound. Whereas the sensitivity of breast MRI is usually very high, specificity—as in all breast imaging modalities—depends on many factors such as reader expertise, use of adequate techniques and composition of the patient cohorts. Since breast MRI will always yield MR-only visible questionable lesions that require an MR-guided intervention for clarification, MRI should only be offered by institutions that can also offer a MRI-guided breast biopsy or that are in close contact with a site that can perform this type of biopsy for them. Radiologists involved in breast imaging should ensure that they have a thorough knowledge of the MRI techniques that are necessary for breast imaging, that they know how to evaluate a breast MRI using the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon, and most important, when to perform breast MRI. This manuscript provides guidelines on the current best practice for the use of breast MRI, and the methods to be used, from the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information

            Abstract This paper summarizes information about breast MRI to be provided to women and referring physicians. After listing contraindications, procedure details are described, stressing the need for correct scheduling and not moving during the examination. The structured report including BI-RADS® categories and further actions after a breast MRI examination are discussed. Breast MRI is a very sensitive modality, significantly improving screening in high-risk women. It also has a role in clinical diagnosis, problem solving, and staging, impacting on patient management. However, it is not a perfect test, and occasionally breast cancers can be missed. Therefore, clinical and other imaging findings (from mammography/ultrasound) should also be considered. Conversely, MRI may detect lesions not visible on other imaging modalities turning out to be benign (false positives). These risks should be discussed with women before a breast MRI is requested/performed. Because breast MRI drawbacks depend upon the indication for the examination, basic information for the most important breast MRI indications is presented. Seventeen notes and five frequently asked questions formulated for use as direct communication to women are provided. The text was reviewed by Europa Donna–The European Breast Cancer Coalition to ensure that it can be easily understood by women undergoing MRI. Key Points • Information on breast MRI concerns advantages/disadvantages and preparation to the examination • Claustrophobia, implantable devices, allergic predisposition, and renal function should be checked • Before menopause, scheduling on day 7–14 of the cycle is preferred • During the examination, it is highly important that the patient keeps still • Availability of prior examinations improves accuracy of breast MRI interpretation Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3807-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI.

              We investigated whether an abbreviated protocol (AP), consisting of only one pre- and one postcontrast acquisition and their derived images (first postcontrast subtracted [FAST] and maximum-intensity projection [MIP] images), was suitable for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                thomas.helbich@meduniwien.ac.at
                Journal
                J Magn Reson Imaging
                J Magn Reson Imaging
                10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2586
                JMRI
                Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1053-1807
                1522-2586
                30 October 2018
                March 2019
                : 49
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/jmri.v49.3 )
                : 864-874
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology Breast Imaging Service NY New York USA
                [ 2 ] Medical University of Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image‐guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging Vienna Austria
                [ 3 ] University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Frankfurt Germany
                [ 4 ] Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging University of Messina Messina Italy
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Address reprint requests to: T.H.H., Medical University of Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image‐guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Vienna, Austria. E‐mail: thomas.helbich@ 123456meduniwien.ac.at
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5614-2660
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8090-3696
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2722-7331
                Article
                JMRI26285
                10.1002/jmri.26285
                6375760
                30375702
                5d6d0c04-9097-42c5-aae8-e42b2c0ded42
                © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 14 May 2018
                : 19 July 2018
                : 23 July 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 5, Pages: 18, Words: 6369
                Funding
                Funded by: Austrian Nationalbank ‘Jubiläumsfond’
                Award ID: 16219
                Award ID: 15082
                Funded by: 2020 – Research and Innovation Framework Programme PHC‐11‐2015
                Award ID: 667211‐2
                Funded by: Novomed Austria
                Funded by: Medicor Austria
                Funded by: Guerbet France
                Funded by: NIH/NCI Cancer Center
                Award ID: P30 CA008748
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Breast
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jmri26285
                March 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.2.1 mode:remove_FC converted:15.05.2019

                Radiology & Imaging
                breast cancer,dynamic contrast‐enhanced mri,diffusion‐weighted imaging,t2‐weighted imaging,bi‐rads

                Comments

                Comment on this article