23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The descriptive epidemiology of accelerometer-measured physical activity in older adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Objectively measured physical activity between older individuals and between populations has been poorly described. We aimed to describe and compare the variation in accelerometry data in older UK (EPIC-Norfolk) and American (NHANES) adults.

          Methods

          Physical activity was measured by uniaxial accelerometry in 4,052 UK (49–91 years) and 3459 US older adults (49–85 years). We summarized physical activity as volume (average counts/minute), its underlying intensity distribution, and as time spent <100counts/minute, ≥809counts/minute and ≥2020counts/minute both for total activity and that undertaken in ≥10-min bouts.

          Results

          In EPIC-Norfolk 65 % of wear-time was spent at <100 counts/minute and 20 % spent in the range 100–500 counts/minute. Only 4.1 % of this cohort accumulated more than 30 min/day of activity above 2020 counts/minute in 10-min bouts. If a cut-point of >809 counts/minute is used 18.7 % of people reached the 30 min/day threshold. By comparison, 2.5 % and 9.5 % of American older adults accumulated activity at these levels, respectively.

          Conclusion

          As assessed by objectively measured physical activity, the majority of older adults in this UK study did not meet current activity guidelines. Older adults in the UK were more active overall, but also spent more time being sedentary than US adults.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0316-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.

          To date, no study has objectively measured physical activity levels among U.S. adults according to the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAGA). The purpose of this study was to assess self-reported and objectively measured physical activity among U.S. adults according to the PAGA. Using data from the NHANES 2005-2006, the PAGA were assessed using three physical activity calculations: moderate plus vigorous physical activity ≥150 minutes/week (MVPA); moderate plus two instances of vigorous physical activity ≥150 minutes/week (M2VPA); and time spent above 3 METs ≥500 MET-minutes/week (METPA). Self-reported physical activity included leisure, transportation, and household activities. Objective activity was measured using Actigraph accelerometers that were worn for 7 consecutive days. Analyses were conducted in 2009-2010. U.S. adults reported 324.5 ± 18.6 minutes/week (M ± SE) of moderate physical activity and 73.6 ± 3.9 minutes/week of vigorous physical activity, although accelerometry estimates were 45.1 ± 4.6 minutes/week of moderate physical activity and 18.6 ± 6.6 minutes/week of vigorous physical activity. The proportion of adults meeting the PAGA according to M2VPA was 62.0% for self-report and 9.6% for accelerometry. According to the NHANES 2005-2006, fewer than 10% of U.S. adults met the PAGA according to accelerometry. However, physical activity estimates vary substantially depending on whether self-reported or measured via accelerometer. Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Physical activity patterns assessed by accelerometry in older people.

            Research into daily physical activity (PA) patterns of older adults (>or=70 years) has primarily relied on self-report. This study used accelerometry, an objective measure of minute-by-minute movement, to assess PA volume and intensity performed by older adults recruited to the Better Ageing project. Results were used to estimate the degree to which current health recommendations for PA were met. Participants [91 older females (OF) aged 76.0 +/- 4.0 years (mean +/- SD), 70 older males (OM) 76.3 +/- 3.9 years, 23 young females (YF) 26.8 +/- 4.1 years and 22 young males (YM) 27.0 +/- 4.2 years] wore an MTI actigraph model 7164 recording activity in 1-min epochs for 7 days. Only those with at least 5 days, and 10 h of actigraph data per day, were included in the analysis, using Caloric.Bas (CSA Inc. 1999) software and a tailored Microsoft Access 2000 macro. Mean counts min(-1) day(-1) were 37% lower for older adults than for young adults [OF 236.1 +/- 84.4 vs. YF 370.0 +/- 81.1 counts min(-1) day(-1) t(114) = -6.86, P < 0.001; OM 255.1 +/- 103.0 vs. YM 404.3 +/- 134.0 ct min(-1) day(-1), t(91) = -5.55, P < 0.001]. Older adults were more restricted in activity intensity range performing significantly fewer minutes of moderate to vigorous (MV) PA day(-1) than young adults [OF 16.7 +/- 12.2 vs. YF 38.4 +/- 18.4 MVPA min day(-1), t(114) = -6.90, P < 0.001; OM 23.8 +/- 20.0 vs. YM 40.4 +/- 19.2 MVPA min day(-1), t(91) = -3.47, P = 0.001]. Nearly half of older adults did not perform any sustained 10-min MVPA bouts (OF 48.4% vs. YF 13.0%, chi2 = 8.10, P = 0.004; OM 44.3% vs. YM 4.5%, chi2 = 9.97, P = 0.002), and none met current PA recommendations for health. This study is the first to provide objective data on a large sample of adults aged 70 years and over and indicates low levels of daily movement that are likely to be inadequate for optimal health benefit.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in active, healthy older adults.

              Despite widespread use of accelerometers to objectively monitor physical activity among adults and youth, little attention has been given to older populations. The purpose of this study was to define an accelerometer-count cut point for a group of older adults and to then assess the group's physical activity for 7 days. Participants (N = 38, age 69.7 +/- 3.5 yr) completed a laboratory-based calibration with an Actigraph 7164 accelerometer. The cut point defining moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was 1,041 counts/min. On average, participants obtained 68 min of MVPA per day, although more than 65% of this occurred as sporadic activity. Longer bouts of activity occurred in the morning (6 a.m. to 12 p.m.) more frequently than other times of the day. Almost 14 hr/day were spent in light-intensity activity. This study demonstrates the rich information that accelerometers provide about older adult activity patterns-information that might further our understanding of the relationship between physical activity and healthy aging.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                katrin.berkemeyer@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
                katrien.wijndaele@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
                tom.white@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
                andrew.cooper@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
                robert.luben@srl.cam.ac.uk
                kate.westgate@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
                simon.griffin@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
                kk101@medschl.cam.ac.uk
                nick.wareham@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
                + 44 1223 769116 , soren.brage@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
                Journal
                Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
                Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
                The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
                BioMed Central (London )
                1479-5868
                7 January 2016
                7 January 2016
                2016
                : 13
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [ ]MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ UK
                [ ]Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN UK
                [ ]Department of Gerontology, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ UK
                Article
                316
                10.1186/s12966-015-0316-z
                4704380
                26739758
                5e5c2f52-d5e9-43dc-b719-9b676a595100
                © Berkemeyer et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 26 August 2015
                : 4 December 2015
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265, Medical Research Council (GB);
                Award ID: G9502233
                Award ID: G0401527
                Award ID: MC_UU_12015/3
                Award ID: MC_UU_12015/4
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289, Cancer Research UK (GB);
                Award ID: C864/A8257
                Funded by: Research into Ageing
                Award ID: 262
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274, British Heart Foundation (GB);
                Award ID: FS/12/58/29709
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                accelerometry,activity intensity distribution,older adults,guidelines
                Nutrition & Dietetics
                accelerometry, activity intensity distribution, older adults, guidelines

                Comments

                Comment on this article