19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most of the tissue used for penetrating keratoplasty is issued through eye banks that store the corneoscleral button either in hypothermic storage at 2–6°C or in organ culture at 31–37°C.

          These two preservation techniques differ in technical aspects, tissue evaluation possibilities, storage time and microbiological safety. Hypothermic storage is simple and requires little expensive equipment. In general a pre-storage evaluation of the endothelium is performed by specular microscopy and storage time is usually around 7–10 days. Organ culture is a relatively complicated technique requiring more expertise and well-equipped facilities. Evaluation of the endothelium is not only performed before storage, but is routinely performed after storage through the use of light microscopy. With organ culture the allowed storage period is longer, up to four weeks. The vulnerability of organ culture to microbial contamination can be turned into an advantage because it allows the detection of residual micro-organisms on the cornea before surgery. Both preservation techniques seem to result in similar graft survival.

          The method of choice for preservation of the donor cornea is dictated by a number of factors mentioned in this review and this helps to explain the geographical differences in the use of the different techniques.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The incidence of fungal keratitis and endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty.

            To determine the incidence of postkeratoplasty fungal endophthalmitis and keratitis at the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary. To determine whether there is a relationship between culture-positive corneoscleral donor material and postoperative infection. The microbiologic records of corneoscleral donor rims submitted for culture following penetrating keratoplasty at the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary between January 1998 and January 2003 were reviewed. The incidence of rim cultures positive for fungi was tabulated. Clinical outcome measures were recorded for each patient receiving corneal donor tissue. Of 2466 donor corneoscleral rims cultured during the study period, 344 were positive for microbial growth (13%). Of those rims with positive cultures, 28 (8.6%) were positive for fungus. All fungi cultured were Candida species. Four of the 28 recipient eyes (14%) who received contaminated donor material went on to develop postkeratoplasty fungal infections. There were no cases of fungal infection in any postkeratoplasty patients in the absence of contaminated donor rims during the study period. Overall, there was a 0.16% incidence of fungal infection (4/2466) following penetrating keratoplasty. There were 18 positive donor rims identified in the first 4 years of the study, but there were 10 cases in the last 10 months of the study. The overall incidence of fungal infection following penetrating keratoplasty is low, but all cases in our study were associated with positive rim cultures. Whether prophylactic antifungal therapy would be of any benefit in the presence of a positive corneoscleral rim culture has not yet been determined.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Predicting Endothelial Cell Loss and Long-Term Corneal Graft Survival

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +32-9-2405226 , +32-9-2403838 , Ilse.Claerhout@UGent.be
                Journal
                Int Ophthalmol
                International Ophthalmology
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0165-5701
                1573-2630
                16 May 2007
                June 2008
                : 28
                : 3
                : 155-163
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cornea Bank Amsterdam, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 47, 1105 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Tissuebank, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
                [3 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
                Article
                9086
                10.1007/s10792-007-9086-1
                2359829
                17505780
                5ee1a299-2c8a-4792-b05c-15f89933e195
                © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
                History
                : 8 February 2007
                : 28 March 2007
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                organ culture,hypothermic storage,eye banking
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                organ culture, hypothermic storage, eye banking

                Comments

                Comment on this article