Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in the United States. Part 1: Introduction to 2006-2008

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Glyphosate-resistant (GR) crop technology has dramatically impacted agriculture. The adoption of GR systems in canola, maize, cotton, soybean and sugar beets has been widespread in the United States. However, weed scientists are concerned that growers' current herbicide programs and weed management tactics will affect their sustainability and effectiveness. Without proper management, the potential for weed populations to express a high degree of resistance to glyphosate will adversely impact the utility of glyphosate. In 2005, weed scientists from six universities initiated a long-term research study to assess the sustainability of GR technology. This paper introduces five other articles in this series. Over 150 fields of at least 10 ha were selected to participate in a long-term field-scale study, and each field was split in half. On one-half the grower continued using the current weed management program; on the other half the grower used academic-recommended herbicide resistance best management practices. Field data were collected in 2006-2008 to determine the impact of the two weed management programs on weed populations, diversity, seedbank, crop yields and economic returns. This long-term study will provide invaluable data for determining the sustainability and profitability of diversified weed management programs designed to lower the risk of evolving weed resistance to glyphosate.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Comparison of Methods for Estimating Seed Numbers in the Soil

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Glyphosate-resistant crops: history, status and future.

              M Dill (2005)
              The commercial launch of glyphosate-resistant soybeans in 1996 signaled the beginning of a new era in weed management in row crops. Today, over 80% of the soybeans grown in the USA are glyphosate resistant. Since that time, many crops have been transformed that have allowed crop applications of many classes of herbicide chemistries. Crops currently under production include maize, soybean, cotton and canola. Transformation technology and selection methods have improved and the rate of development as well as the breadth of crops being considered as commercial targets has increased. On the basis of recent adoption rates by growers around the world, it appears that glyphosate-resistant crops will continue to grow in number and in hectares planted. However, global public acceptance of biotechnology-derived products will continue to impact the rate of adoption of this and other new innovations derived from transformation technology. Copyright 2005 Society of Chemical Industry
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pest Management Science
                Pest. Manag. Sci.
                Wiley
                1526498X
                July 2011
                July 2011
                March 29 2011
                : 67
                : 7
                : 741-746
                Article
                10.1002/ps.2160
                21674750
                5f158b21-6bf0-4b6e-b898-b85f575fecdf
                © 2011

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article