8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessing COVID-19 Health Literacy (CoHL) and its relationships with sociodemographic features, locus of control and compliance with social distancing rules during the first lockdown in France

      research-article
      , ,
      Health Education Research
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Health literacy (HL) is critical to find, understand and use health information for adopting appropriate health behavior, especially during a pandemic crisis in which people can be exposed to an overwhelming amount of information from different media. To this end, we conducted an online study to first validate the measure of COronaVIrus Disease appeared in 2019 (COVID-19) health literacy (CoHL) and then investigated its relationships with locus of control (LoC), news information search and the adoption of protective behaviors (PBs) during the first lockdown in France. We first showed the good structural and psychometric qualities of the CoHL scale on a 3-dimensional structure: the Critical dimension, the Extraction/Communicative and the Application/Communicative dimension. We then found that CoHL was associated with the adoption of PBs suggesting that people with higher CoHL tended to adopt more PBs during the first lockdown, regardless of their LoC. However, people with low CoHL would be more likely to adopt PBs if they believe that they may get COVID-19 due to the behavior and health conditions of others (high external LoC). The study has implications for the design of public health campaigns for people with inadequate HL and with a different LoC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

          Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models

            Background Health literacy concerns the knowledge and competences of persons to meet the complex demands of health in modern society. Although its importance is increasingly recognised, there is no consensus about the definition of health literacy or about its conceptual dimensions, which limits the possibilities for measurement and comparison. The aim of the study is to review definitions and models on health literacy to develop an integrated definition and conceptual model capturing the most comprehensive evidence-based dimensions of health literacy. Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify definitions and conceptual frameworks of health literacy. A content analysis of the definitions and conceptual frameworks was carried out to identify the central dimensions of health literacy and develop an integrated model. Results The review resulted in 17 definitions of health literacy and 12 conceptual models. Based on the content analysis, an integrative conceptual model was developed containing 12 dimensions referring to the knowledge, motivation and competencies of accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health-related information within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion setting, respectively. Conclusions Based upon this review, a model is proposed integrating medical and public health views of health literacy. The model can serve as a basis for developing health literacy enhancing interventions and provide a conceptual basis for the development and validation of measurement tools, capturing the different dimensions of health literacy within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Health Educ Res
                Health Educ Res
                healed
                Health Education Research
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0268-1153
                1465-3648
                June 2022
                17 May 2022
                17 May 2022
                : 37
                : 3
                : 143-154
                Affiliations
                departmentDépartement Transport Santé Sécurité (TS2), Campus Méditerranée, Laboratoire Mécanismes d’Accidents (LMA), Université Gustave Eiffel (ex-IFSTTAR), 304, Chemin de la croix blanche , Salon-de-Provence 13300, France
                departmentSchool of Information Sciences (MC 387), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 614 E Daniel St (#5139), Champaign, IL 61820, USA
                departmentUFR de Psychologie, Département de Psychologie Cognitive et Ergonomie, Laboratoire Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie (CLLE, UT2J & CNRS), Université Toulouse Jean Jaurés (UT2J), Maison de la recherche, 5 allées Antonio Machado, Toulouse, F-31058 Cedex 9 , France
                Author notes
                *Correspondence to: C. Rodon. E-mail: carole.rodon@ 123456hotmail.fr
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8368-2486
                Article
                cyac009
                10.1093/her/cyac009
                9384039
                35581167
                5f2f891a-21b7-484f-a533-bf10184a5068
                © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

                This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                : 12 July 2021
                : 05 March 2022
                : 10 May 2022
                : 05 April 2022
                : 17 May 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Original Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00860
                Editor's Choice

                Education
                Education

                Comments

                Comment on this article