32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prediction model and prognostic index to estimate clinically relevant pelvic organ prolapse in a general female population

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction and hypothesis

          Estimation on prevalence and distribution of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) signs in a general female population is difficult. We therefore developed and validated a prediction model and prognostic instrument.

          Methods

          Questionnaires were sent to a general female population (45–85 years). A random sample underwent vaginal examination for POP (POPQ). A prediction model was developed using multivariate analysis and validated in a subgroup of participants.

          Results

          Positive questionnaire-response rate was 46.8% (1,397 of 2,979). From the questionnaire group, 649 women were vaginally examined (46.5%). Prevalence of clinically relevant POP was 21%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly higher odds ratios on the report of vaginal bulging, parity ≥2 and a mother with POP. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed areas under the curve of 0.672 and 0.640.

          Conclusions

          The prevalence of POP at or beyond the hymen could be estimated in a general female population using our prediction model with 17 questions and our POP score chart with eight questions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Missing data: our view of the state of the art.

          Statistical procedures for missing data have vastly improved, yet misconception and unsound practice still abound. The authors frame the missing-data problem, review methods, offer advice, and raise issues that remain unresolved. They clear up common misunderstandings regarding the missing at random (MAR) concept. They summarize the evidence against older procedures and, with few exceptions, discourage their use. They present, in both technical and practical language, 2 general approaches that come highly recommended: maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian multiple imputation (MI). Newer developments are discussed, including some for dealing with missing data that are not MAR. Although not yet in the mainstream, these procedures may eventually extend the ML and MI methods that currently represent the state of the art.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

            This article presents a standard system of terminology recently approved by the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons for the description of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. An objective site-specific system for describing, quantitating, and staging pelvic support in women is included. It has been developed to enhance both clinical and academic communication regarding individual patients and populations of patients. Clinicians and researchers caring for women with pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction are encouraged to learn and use the system.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

              To identify methods to increase response to postal questionnaires. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of any method to influence response to postal questionnaires. 292 randomised controlled trials including 258 315 participants INTERVENTION REVIEWED: 75 strategies for influencing response to postal questionnaires. The proportion of completed or partially completed questionnaires returned. The odds of response were more than doubled when a monetary incentive was used (odds ratio 2.02; 95% confidence interval 1.79 to 2.27) and almost doubled when incentives were not conditional on response (1.71; 1.29 to 2.26). Response was more likely when short questionnaires were used (1.86; 1.55 to 2.24). Personalised questionnaires and letters increased response (1.16; 1.06 to 1.28), as did the use of coloured ink (1.39; 1.16 to 1.67). The odds of response were more than doubled when the questionnaires were sent by recorded delivery (2.21; 1.51 to 3.25) and increased when stamped return envelopes were used (1.26; 1.13 to 1.41) and questionnaires were sent by first class post (1.12; 1.02 to 1.23). Contacting participants before sending questionnaires increased response (1.54; 1.24 to 1.92), as did follow up contact (1.44; 1.22 to 1.70) and providing non-respondents with a second copy of the questionnaire (1.41; 1.02 to 1.94). Questionnaires designed to be of more interest to participants were more likely to be returned (2.44; 1.99 to 3.01), but questionnaires containing questions of a sensitive nature were less likely to be returned (0.92; 0.87 to 0.98). Questionnaires originating from universities were more likely to be returned than were questionnaires from other sources, such as commercial organisations (1.31; 1.11 to 1.54). Health researchers using postal questionnaires can improve the quality of their research by using the strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-33-4560737 , +31-33-4511769 , m.slieker@somt.nl
                Journal
                Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct
                International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
                Springer-Verlag (London )
                0937-3462
                1433-3023
                15 May 2009
                September 2009
                : 20
                : 9
                : 1013-1021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Cobra Research Institute, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Department Paediatrics/Paediatric Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [7 ]Department Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [8 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology/Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [9 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [10 ]Softwareweg 5, 3821 BN Amersfoort, The Netherlands
                Article
                903
                10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0
                2721134
                19444367
                5f9c637d-5909-46fc-bd59-ca98058a3496
                © The Author(s) 2009
                History
                : 30 December 2008
                : 22 April 2009
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The International Urogynecological Association 2009

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                popq,prevalence,vaginal bulging,prediction model,pelvic organ prolapse
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                popq, prevalence, vaginal bulging, prediction model, pelvic organ prolapse

                Comments

                Comment on this article