2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lateral clavicle fracture-plating options and considerations

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Clavicle fractures are among the most prevalent types of fractures with numerous treatment strategies that have evolved over time. In the realm of lateral-third clavicle fracture management, several surgical methods are available, with plate and screw constructs being one of the most frequently employed options. Within this construct, numerous choices exist for fixing the fracture. This editorial provides an overview of the common plate options utilized in the management of distal third clavicle fractures underscoring the critical considerations and approaches that guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate fixation techniques, considering the complex landscape of clavicle fractures and their challenging management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The incidence of fractures of the clavicle.

          The age- and gender-specific incidences were calculated in 2035 cases of fracture of the clavicle. The fractures were classified in three groups according to the Allman system. Each group was further divided into undisplaced and displaced fracture subgroups, with an extra subgroup of comminuted midclavicular fractures in Group I. Seventy-six percent of the fractures were classified as Allman Group I. The median age in this group was 13 years. There were significant differences in age- and gender-specific incidence between the undisplaced, displaced, and comminuted fracture subgroups. Twenty-one percent were classified as Allman Group II. The median age of the patients was 47 years, and there was no difference in age between the undisplaced and displaced fracture subgroups. Three percent were classified as Allman Group III, and the median age of the patients in this group was 59 years. All three groups were characterized by a significant preponderance of men, and there was a significant increase in the incidence of clavicular fracture, both overall and sports-related, between 1952 and 1987.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group.

            Fractures of the clavicle were reported to represent 2.6% of all fractures with an overall incidence of 64 per 100,000 per year (1987, Malmö, Sweden). Midshaft fractures account for approximately 69% to 81% of all clavicle fractures. Treatment options for acute midshaft clavicle fractures include nonoperative treatment (mostly sling or figure-of-eight bandage), open reduction and internal fixation with plates, and closed or open reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary pins, wires, or a nail. Most surgeons prefer nonoperative treatment of nondisplaced midshaft clavicle fractures. However, the optimal treatment option for isolated acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures remains controversial. This study was designed to systematically summarize and compare results of different treatment options (nonoperative, operative extramedullary fixation, and operative intramedullary fixation) in the management of midshaft clavicle fractures, specifically for displaced fractures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture.

              Nonunion is a rare complication of a fracture of the clavicle, but its occurrence can compromise shoulder function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for nonunion in a cohort of patients who were treated nonoperatively after a clavicular fracture. Over a fifty-one-month period, we performed a prospective, observational cohort study of a consecutive series of 868 patients (638 men and 230 women with a median age of 29.5 years; interquartile range, 19.25 to 46.75 years) with a radiographically confirmed fracture of the clavicle, which was treated nonoperatively. Eight patients were excluded from the study, as they received immediate surgery. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks after the injury. There were 581 fractures in the diaphysis, 263 fractures in the lateral fifth of the clavicle, and twenty-four fractures in the medial fifth. On survivorship analysis, the overall prevalence of nonunion at twenty-four weeks after the fracture was 6.2%, with 8.3% of the medial end fractures, 4.5% of the diaphyseal fractures, and 11.5% of the lateral end fractures remaining ununited. Following a diaphyseal fracture, the risk of nonunion was significantly increased by advancing age, female gender, displacement of the fracture, and the presence of comminution (p < 0.05 for all). On multivariate analysis, all of these factors remained independently predictive of nonunion, and, in the final model, the risk of nonunion was increased by lack of cortical apposition (relative risk = 0.43; 95% confidence interval = 0.34 to 0.54), female gender (relative risk = 0.70; 95% confidence interval = 0.55 to 0.89), the presence of comminution (relative risk = 0.69; 95% confidence interval = 0.52 to 0.91), and advancing age (relative risk = 0.99; 95% confidence interval = 0.99 to 1.00). Following a lateral end fracture, the risk of nonunion was significantly increased only by advancing age and displacement of the fracture (p < 0.05 for both). On multivariate analysis, both of these factors remained independently predictive of nonunion (p < 0.05), and, in the final model, the risk of nonunion was increased by a lack of cortical apposition (relative risk = 0.38; 95% confidence interval = 0.25 to 0.57) and advancing age (relative risk = 0.98; 95% confidence interval = 0.97 to 0.99). Nonunion at twenty-four weeks after a clavicular fracture is an uncommon occurrence, although the prevalence is higher than previously reported. There are subgroups of individuals who appear to be predisposed to the development of this complication, either from intrinsic factors, such as age or gender, or from the type of injury sustained. The predictive models that we developed may be used clinically to counsel patients about the risk for the development of this complication immediately after the injury.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Clin Cases
                WJCC
                World Journal of Clinical Cases
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                2307-8960
                26 February 2024
                26 February 2024
                : 12
                : 6
                : 1039-1044
                Affiliations
                Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore 641045, Tamil Nadu, India
                Department of Biotechnology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore 641021, Tamil Nadu, India
                Department of Orthopaedics, Government Karur Medical College, Karur 639004, Tamil Nadu, India. drsathishmuthu@ 123456gmail.com
                Department of Orthopaedics, Government Thiruvallur Medical College, Thiruvallur 631203, Tamil Nadu, India
                Department of Orthopaedics, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai 600010, Tamil Nadu, India
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Muthu S performed the conceptualization, data curation, data analysis, manuscript writing, and revision of the manuscript; Annamalai S performed the data analysis, manuscript writing, and revision of the manuscript; Kandasamy V performed data analysis, manuscript writing, and revision of the manuscript.

                Corresponding author: Sathish Muthu, DNB, MS, Assistant Professor, Research Associate, Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Group, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore 641045, Tamil Nadu, India. drsathishmuthu@ 123456gmail.com

                Article
                jWJCC.v12.i6.pg1039 89074
                10.12998/wjcc.v12.i6.1039
                10921304
                38464924
                615ff750-3364-42d7-bc6d-95da3a0c7b05
                ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 19 October 2023
                : 21 December 2023
                : 12 January 2024
                Categories
                Editorial

                clavicle fracture,surgical management,distal clavicle plating,superior plating,anterior plating

                Comments

                Comment on this article