33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A structured course in laboratory animal science for postgraduates: Is it a necessity?

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, Animal experiments (AE) are an important element in the training of postgraduates in pharmacology and other disciplines. Use of animals in various basic medical science programs for education and experimental research has been largely criticized on the grounds of animal rights, poor ethical consideration, and inability to follow guidelines laid down by various agencies for maintaining and handling laboratory animals. It may not be true in all instances but is a subject of serious concern. The utilization of AE in biomedical research demands a certain level of knowledge and manual dexterity in the scientists conducting the research. There is a wide diversity in the postgraduate curricula with respect to animal experimental knowledge and skills in the different medical colleges of India. Despite several postgraduate institutes in the country having a well-defined curriculum for AE, the “actual” curriculum followed is a trace of what is actually defined. Hence, the required level of expertise is often not obtained by the students. Moreover, the problems are compounded by the difficulty in attaining animals and strict regulations limiting their use.[1] As such, several attempts have been made to eliminate animals from the laboratory scene. However, they shall always remain an integral part of medical research for providing useful biological information as the intact animal usually provides a suitable model to study the complex interactive processes in the human body, which can be extrapolated and translated to human advantage. If we expect proper utilization of laboratory animals in research, we need to address the issue at a very basic level, i.e., during postgraduate training when the candidate is first exposed to these experiments to develop appropriate skills in the area of expertise. However, most candidates are naive to the basic requirements of animal experiments. We need to familiarize and sensitize the young scientists to respect animal life and appreciate their contribution in development of medical science. Appropriately designed AE with a strong statistical underpinning and with ideal conditions of animal care, which lessen stress or pain, often generate more reliable results.[2] The absence of reporting of ethics and complete statistical aspects in animal experimental research in certain medical journals in India[3] indicate that most of our scientists are unaware of these pertinent facts or don't consider it of any importance while reporting. The ethical and scientific validity of the research, especially animal based, ought to be seriously considered. If this is ignored at this initial stage, it may become critical and the root cause for the criticism of standards and guidelines followed subsequently. The implementation of the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) in biomedical research and medical education has been globally accepted. However, in India only a few organizations such as Mahatma Gandhi-Doerenkamp Center for Alternatives to Use of Animals in Life Science Education, I-CARE, People for Animals, PETA India, JIPMER (Pondicherry) and InterNICHE are actively involved in propagating the use of alternatives to AE.[4] This leads to the assumption that most of our postgraduate students are under-exposed to the concept of 3Rs, which needs to be addressed. In view of the aforesaid, we advocate a pre-entry course in Laboratory Animal Science (LAS) for all postgraduate programs utilizing animals for biomedical research. This will sensitize the researchers regarding the ethical issues as well as handling of animals. The objectives of this course will be to develop greater insight, confidence, competency, and responsibility in the students in their approach towards the use of animals for scientific purpose. We envision this course to be of basic level describing the fundamental aspects of LAS. Additional training for specialized surgery, special techniques on different species can be obtained through inter-institutional collaboration with experienced researchers. This course will hopefully inculcate an attitude of respect towards laboratory animals in the young scientists and train them to design AE based on highest possible scientific and ethical standards keeping in line with the 3Rs concept. The main desiderata of the curriculum for this course can include the biology and husbandry of laboratory animals; microbiology and disease; health hazards and safe practices in the animal house; efficient experimental design, conduct and appropriate statistical analysis; anesthesia, analgesia and experimental procedures; alternatives to animal use and principles of the 3Rs; ethics of the use of animals or animal tissues in research; legislation; analysis of scientific literature dealing with animal studies.[5] We suggest that the premier institutions of the country (with the technical know-how and the required infrastructure) should conduct this LAS course for a duration of 2-3 weeks depending on the availability of resources and teaching faculty. A combination of didactic lectures and practical hands-on sessions would be ideal. All the experimental procedures must be ethically performed as per recommended guidelines. Practical sessions can be conducted in the following progressive manner: Video viewing sessions on handling, restraining animals humanely and different techniques for sampling/administration of drugs Step wise demonstrations and practice on plastic dummies Demonstrations of the techniques on live animals Replication of the techniques by the students under supervision. The attendees must be introduced to national regulations regarding use of laboratory animals by organizations such as Indian National Science Academy (INSA); Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). International guidelines for reporting of research using animals (ARRIVE guidelines) should also be known. The faculty conducting this course should involve not only pharmacologists, but also experts from veterinary and biomedical sciences and organizations involved in preclinical studies. A student handbook providing all course details and resources for reference is recommended. As assessment drives learning, all attendees must undergo a summative examination on completion of the course. The anticipated outcomes of this LAS course are: Enhanced knowledge and technical skill in AE Superior quality of the scientific output with reduced variance in research results Better understanding of the 3Rs concept and awareness of the current alternatives Implementation of the 3Rs in the designing future research Reduction in animal use Ethical considerations during the conduct of AE Sharing of expertise and resources among institutions Opportunities to interact with organizations and experts advocating 3Rs Fulfilment of international training requirements for scientists intending to do biomedical research involving animals. We are conscious of the fact that there may be practical difficulties in initiating this course, which may be financial, technical, or related to logistics. However, we call upon the premier government and private institutions to be trendsetters in this direction. Although a course is being offered by National Centre for Laboratory Animal Sciences on an adhoc basis, not much progress has been done on this aspect in the country despite the recommendations by INSA and CPCSEA. In most of the European countries, courses based on the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) guidelines are mandatory for scientists intending to do biomedical research involving animals.[5] Participants of these courses have given good feedback with more than 98% of the students regarding the course as indispensable for all scientists using animals in biomedical research as a means to increase knowledge, develop technical skills, and also to raise awareness to ethical aspects of the use of animal models of research.[6] We propose that these guidelines can be utilized in the framing of curriculum of the advocated LAS course. With the increasing number of private colleges offering Postgraduate courses it is mandatory that regulations be clarified about the ethical use of animals in training. Just as the training in research methodology is imperative for postgraduates, similarly we deem it essential that they be fully trained in LAS. As the new Medical Council of India (MCI) law has made research publications mandatory for promotions, this course will go a long way in generating superior quality animal research publications. A curb on improper use of laboratory animals is currently the need of the hour in our postgraduate programs. Thus, a well structured LAS course, which educates and trains the researchers, will show the way forward. We recommend that this course be made mandatory for all postgraduate students pursuing degree in basic and allied health sciences. This will equip them with the knowledge and skills to plan their AE in the most efficient manner with minimum harm to laboratory animals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Replacement, reduction and refinement.

          In 1959, William Russell and Rex Burch published "The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique". They proposed that if animals were to be used in experiments, every effort should be made to Replace them with non-sentient alternatives, to Reduce to a minimum the number of animals used, and to Refine experiments which used animals so that they caused the minimum pain and distress. These guiding principles, the "3 Rs" of animal research, were initially given little attention. Gradually, however, they have become established as essential considerations when animals are used in research. They have influenced new legislation aimed at controlling the use of experimental animals, and in the United Kingdom they have become formally incorporated into the Animal (Scientific) Procedures Act. The three principles, of Replacement, Reduction and Refinement, have also proven to be an area of common ground for research workers who use animals, and those who oppose their use. Scientists, who accept the need to use animals in some experiments, would also agree that it would be preferable not to use animals. If animals were to be used, as few as possible should be used and they should experience a minimum of pain or distress. Many of those who oppose animal experimentation, would also agree that until animal experimentation is stopped, Russell and Burch's 3Rs provide a means to improve animal welfare. It has also been recognised that adoption of the 3Rs can improve the quality of science. Appropriately designed experiments that minimise variation, provide standardised optimum conditions of animals care and minimise unnecessary stress or pain, often yield better more reliable data. Despite the progress made as a result of attention to these principles, several major problems have been identified. When replacing animals with alternative methods, it has often proven difficult to formally validate the alternative. This has proven a particular problem in regulatory toxicology, especially when combined with the labyrinthine processes of the various regulatory authorities. The principle of Reduction would appear less contentious, but its application has highlighted the difficulties of providing appropriate expert statistical advice, especially in academic research facilities. In some instances, concern to implement Reduction strategies can result in the use of too few animals, which leads to inconclusive results, and wasteful experiments. It is in the area of Refinement, however, that major problems have arisen. Much of our judgement of what represents Refinement is based on little more than common sense. We make assumptions about animals and their feelings that often have little scientific basis. In many instances we may be correct, but these assumptions may become incorporated into institutional or national policies, without any attempt to verify them. To give an example - it is reasonable to assume that animals will experience pain after a surgical procedure, so pain-relieving drugs should be given to prevent this. We have some idea of the appropriate dose of analgesics for most animals, but effective pain relief requires that dose given is adjusted to meet the requirements of the individual animal. Requiring every animal to have the same dose of the same drug after any surgical procedure is not the best way of dealing with post-operative pain. Discussion of these problems should not detract from the very significant progress that has been made in the 40 or so years since Russell and Burch set out their guiding principles. What is needed now is greater academic focus on this area, not only to work on new methods of implementing the 3Rs, but also to disseminate current "Best Practice", and to revise this advice as further progress is made.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            FELASA recommendations on the education and training of persons working with laboratory animals: categories A and C. Reports of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations Working Group on Education accepted by the FELASA Board of Management.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Reporting of method of animal sacrifice in articles published in Indian journals

              Sir, Since long time, a constant demand is made for following of stringent ethical criteria for animal experimental studies. National and international journals publishing the animal studies instruct their authors to report various ethical parameters in manuscripts sent for publication.[1 2] In a recent survey done for animal studies done in US and UK, it was observed that various components of the studies are not reported adequately in the published articles.[3] On the basis of this survey, a guideline is formulated for reporting of animal studies. This guideline is called ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) guideline.[4] This guideline is based on CONSORT (consolidated standards of reporting trials) statement for reporting of clinical trials.[5] In the “ethical statement section” it is mentioned that in the manuscript of animal studies, ethical parameters like permission from Institutional ethics committee, license and information regarding various national and international ethical guidelines regarding the use and care of animal should be mentioned. According to this guideline, method of euthanasia should also be mentioned in the manuscript. In an article published in British Journal of Pharmacology it is mentioned that though this guideline is given for in vivo animal experiments it may also applicable for the in vitro experiments done on isolated tissues of animals.[6] In the same, article authors emphasize the importance of detailed reporting of method of euthanasia to see if there is any influence of this on obtained data or not. Various studies highlighted the impact of different euthanasia methods on various experimental outcomes. In a recent study done by Al-Mousawi et al., it was observed that different method of euthanasia in rodent model of severe burn injury influence the levels of various types of inflammatory mediators.[7] According to CPCSEA (Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals) guideline approved method of euthanasia should be used for sacrificing the animals and choice of euthanasia should depend on type of study and species of animals.[8] This guideline also mentions some unacceptable method of euthanasia for any animal or species.[8] It is been observed that studies regarding the reporting of ethics in animal studies are very less and there is hardly any data available for the animal studies published in Indian Journals. So this study was designed with the primary aim of appraising animal studies published in two Indian Pharmacology Journals for reporting of whether the information regarding method of sacrifice is mentioned in the manuscripts or not? And if it is mentioned whether the method of sacrifice is acceptable according to CPCSEA or not? Secondary aim of this study was to compare this observation (reporting of method of sacrifice of animal) with some international journal. Indian Journal of Pharmacology (IJP) and Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology are well-known indexed pharmacology journals published in India, chosen for the study. For International comparison British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) was selected. All the original animal studies published in IJP, IJPP between 2002 to the latest issue of 2010 were downloaded manually from the website of journals (www.ijp-online.com, www.ijpp.com). Original animal studies published in BJP from 2002 to September 2009 were downloaded from journals website (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291476-5381). In the case of BJP, articles published after September 2009 were not available for open access. In the case of IJPP articles published since 2002 were available on website. Therefore, to maintain uniformity for all the journals, all the articles which were published in or after 2002 were downloaded. Only original animal studies were considered for the study. Short communications, research letters, letter to editors were not taken into account. Out of all the original animal studies downloaded, 50 animal studies were selected randomly (by computer generated random numbers) each from IJP and IJPP and 100 animal studies were randomly selected from the BJP by the first author (JK). For the equal comparison, animal studies only related to pharmacology were downloaded from the IJPP. Each author (JK, PY, NDK) evaluated the animal studies. The method of sacrifice, if mentioned was noted in the predesigned proforma. Discrepancies were solved by consensus. It was observed that in 57 articles in Indian Journals (IJP, IJPP) it was mentioned that animal was sacrificed. Out of these 57, exact method of sacrifice was mentioned in 35 (61.4%, 95% CI: 48.4%-72.9%) articles. In the case of BJP, in 72 articles it was mentioned that animals were sacrificed. Out of these 72, method of sacrifice was mentioned in 32 (44.4%, 95% CI: 33.5%-55.9%) articles. On the statistical comparison with the help of chi-square test this difference in reporting of exact method of sacrifice between Indian and International Journal was found to be insignificant (P = 0.057) [Table 1]. Methods of sacrifice reported in both groups are mentioned in Table 2. On the basis of CPCSEA guidelines, only two methods were found to be ethically unacceptable (stunning, cutting of jugular vein). Table 1 Reporting of method of sacrifice Table 2 Method of sacrifice and frequency On the basis of this study, it can be said that reporting of method of killing of animal is deficient in not only in Indian Pharmacology Journals but also in International Journals. Measures should be taken to improve the reporting of exact method of sacrifice. In the case of isolated tissue experiments, response of tissue is not only influenced by the type of anesthesia (as euthanasia), but also by timing of sacrificing of animal. So, this information must be included in the study.[6] Editor should demand from authors regarding information related to method of euthanasia during the initial review of manuscripts. Instruction of authors section of journals publishing animal studies should be revised to incorporate the information regarding method of sacrifice. It is also a duty of peer reviewer to see whether the sufficient information related to ethical parameters including method of sacrifice is mentioned in the article or not? On the basis of this study we support the use of some structured guideline like ARRIVE guideline for reporting of animal studies so that all the components can be reported adequately. We also like to appeal editors of various biomedical journals involved in publishing animal studies to include ARRIVE guideline in the “Instruction to author section.” This study has few limitations. Findings are based on only three pharmacology journals so more journals, not only from pharmacology but also from other specialties publishing animal studies could have been included. Other limitation is only those articles which mentioned the sacrifice of animals were included. We believe there is a underreporting of this statement especially in animal studies related with isolated tissue experiments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Pharmacol Pharmacother
                J Pharmacol Pharmacother
                JPP
                Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0976-500X
                0976-5018
                Jan-Mar 2013
                : 4
                : 1
                : 67-68
                Affiliations
                [1] Department of Pharmacology, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Syed Ilyas Shehnaz, Department of Pharmacology, Gulf Medical University, P.O.Box: 4184, Ajman, United Arab Emirates. E-mail: shehnazilyas@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                JPP-4-67
                10.4103/0976-500X.107689
                3643349
                23662030
                6179781f-8dc7-4109-ac89-9c6265c0744d
                Copyright: © Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Correspondence

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article