6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      TPExtreme randomized trial: Quality of Life (QoL) and survival according to second-line treatments in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          6507

          Background: TPExtreme trial comparing EXTREME regimen to the taxane-based TPEx confirmed the encouraging survival results of the TPEx regimen, despite lack of significant overall survival (OS) increase, with a significantly lower toxicity than the EXTREME regimen. Herein, the QoL and exploratory analyses of survival according to 2 nd line treatments focusing on immunotherapy (IO) are presented. Methods: Randomized (1:1), open-label trial. Main inclusion criteria were R/M HNSCC not suitable for loco-regional treatment, age 18-70 years, PS < 2, creatinin clearance > 60ml/min, prior cisplatin < 300 mg/m². 539 pts were enrolled over a period of 37 months (mo). QoL was evaluated with QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline, week(W)12, W18, W26 and analyzed by linear mixed model. The primary QoL endpoint was the Global Health Status score. 2 nd line treatments were collected for 501 (93%) patients (pts), 256 in the EXTREME arm and 245 in the TPEx arm. Results: The percentage of QLQ-C30 questionnaires filled at baseline, W12, W18 and W26 were similar in the 2 arms, 89%, 52%, 43%, and 39% in the EXTREME arm and 91%, 59%, 40%, and 37% in the TPEx arm, respectively.. Higher scores of Global Health Status (p = 0.02), physical functioning (p = 0.009) and role functioning (p = 0.013) and lower scores of appetite loss (p = 0.041) were observed in the TPEx arm than in the EXTREME arm. No significant difference was observed for the other scores. In 2 nd line treatment, 120 (47%) pts in the EXTREME arm and 109 (44%) in the TPEx arm received chemotherapy +/- cetuximab (CT); 41 (16%) pts in the EXTREME arm and 41 (17%) in the TPEx arm received IO, mainly anti-PD-1/PD-L1. 79% and 85% of these 2 nd line treatments were given after progression in EXTREME and TPEx arms respectively. Median OS (95%CI) since randomization was 17.6 (15.2 – 19.5) mo with CT and 19.4 (13.4 – 22.3) mo with IO in the EXTREME arm vs 14.9 (13.0 – 16.3) and 21.9 (15.9 – 35.0) mo in the TPEx arm (interaction test p = 0.077) respectively. Median OS since start of 2 nd line was 9.3 mo with CT and 8.3 mo with IO in the EXTREME arm, and 7.1 and 11.6 mo respectively in the TPEx arm. Conclusions: An improvement in the QoL of patients was observed in the TPEx arm compared to that of the EXTREME arm. Exploratory analysis showed that the taxane-based TPEx regimen followed by IO in 2 nd line could provide interesting median OS for pts who need CT in 1 st line, with less toxicity than EXTREME. This sequential treatment deserves to be compared to a strategy that starts with Platinum+5FU+pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT02268695 .

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          May 20 2020
          May 20 2020
          : 38
          : 15_suppl
          : 6507
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Centre Antoine Lacassagne, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France;
          [2 ]Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology, Lyon, France;
          [3 ]Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain;
          [4 ]Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France;
          [5 ]Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France;
          [6 ]Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France;
          [7 ]Radiotherapie, Centre G Le Conquerant, Le Havre, France;
          [8 ]Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Site Paul Papin, Angers, France;
          [9 ]Centre Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France;
          [10 ]Hôpital Prive du Confluent S.A.S, Nantes, France;
          [11 ]Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France;
          [12 ]Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest–René Gauducheau, Nantes, France;
          [13 ]Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France;
          [14 ]CH de Lorient, Lorient, France;
          [15 ]Service de Biostatistique Et d’Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France;
          [16 ]GORTEC, Tours, France;
          [17 ]Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany;
          [18 ]Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.6507
          619c5286-80c1-4964-ba14-c86ea96950c2
          © 2020
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article